Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Profile
Web Exclusive
Survey

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

COMMENTARY:
Leo Ribuffo on Religion and Ronald Reagan
June 11, 2004    Episode no. 741
Read This Week's November 7, 2008
Go
Read the comments of historian Leo Ribuffo on Ronald Reagan and religion:

Photo of Leo Ribuffo It should not be surprising, given the prevailing American mores of his era, his background as the child of a mixed Protestant/Roman Catholic marriage, and his years amid the flexible mores of Hollywood, that Ronald Reagan was a religious eclectic. As the writer Frances FitzGerald once observed, Ronald Reagan "believed in everything." At various points in his life he expressed interest in premillennial dispensationalist Bible prophecy, Bah'ai, and the Shroud of Turin. Americans sensed this and found silly Walter Mondale's charge in 1984 that Reagan was in the grip of fundamentalists and would let Jerry Falwell name the Supreme Court as openings occurred. (In my one contact with a presidential campaign, I tried to convince the Mondale people that this was not only stupid but also would fail because it was so obviously stupid.)

One could also easily place Reagan in the tradition of presidential civil religion (though the Christian right claims him as uniquely theirs, as they claim, with similar inappropriateness, presidents back to George Washington). Indeed, we could put side by side religious quotations from Ronald Reagan and FDR, and it would not be possible to tell who said what. Several hundred scholars, at minimum, could make these points, though most journalists remain ignorant (sometimes willfully so) of them.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
What's the good news? The media understanding of Ronald Reagan's religion is marginally less dopey than the media's presentation of George W. Bush (same eclectic and civil religion tradition, but less curious about matters of faith). And I'll bet anyone $100 that Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson will be nowhere near Reagan's funeral service.

-- Leo P. Ribuffo is the Society of the Cincinnati George Washington Distinguished Professor in the history department at George Washington University.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP