Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Profile
Web Exclusive
Survey

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

INTERVIEW:
Mike McCurry
July 23, 2004    Episode no. 747
Read This Week's November 7, 2008
Go
Read more of Kim Lawton's interview with former Clinton press secretary Mike McCurry about religion and the Democratic Party:

Q: Do the Democrats have a problem with religion?

Photo of Mike McCurry A: They don't have a problem with religion; they just don't know how to dance very well. That's the problem, I think. Many Democrats are not accustomed to speaking of their faith and relating their faith to political action. This is something that's just not part, hasn't been part of the culture of the party. So it's a new vocabulary for many Democrats, and I think that's what we're getting used to.

Q: Is it important that they learn this language?

A: It is because, I think, increasingly, as politics are debates about values and what matters to you, your faith life informs the way in which you approach many issues important in the public domain. And I think communicating that clearly, making it clear that Democrats don't cede any ground at all to the other party when it comes to how religion informs the work we do in politics ... that's a very important part of our debate.

Q: What kinds of things would you like to see Democrats do? How can they learn this language and how can they employ it?

A: Well, I'd like Democrats to not, you know, brazenly do what Republicans sometimes do, which is to lead with a faux religion. I would really like to see Democrats speak genuinely and authentically about how religion and how faith informs the positions we take on so many issues -- social justice issues, how we deal with issues that concern the dispossessed, the poor. How faith informs the way in which we think through and reason about issues related to war and peace. I mean, all of these things -- there's a very rich tradition in which the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates, historically, have had a lot to say. And I think we just need to find that voice again.

Q: Howard Dean got into some trouble earlier in the campaign season when he tried to do this. Why did that not work for him?

A: Well, it didn't quite work for him because he mislocated the Book of Job, but he basically got the idea right. I think it's not natural to pretend that you are more faithful than you are. It's not wise to try to pretend that you are an AME preacher just because you are speaking in front of an audience of black laypeople. It's probably not comfortable to overdo it when it comes to religion, but the tonal quality of this is very important. Most Americans are faithful. Most Americans believe in God. Even if they don't go to church every Sunday, most Americans attend worship. And I think, so do Democrats. Democrats are just like most Americans, and I think we need to communicate that more effectively.

Q: Do you think there is a block of voters out there that may be undecided that could be swayed?

A: I think there are a lot of people who are ambivalent about politics, and many of those people are ambivalent about their own faith. They are not necessarily dogmatic; they're not necessarily fundamentalists. They probably don't consider themselves in the same place as many evangelical, conservative Christians. But at the same time they consider themselves deeply religious, and they think that their religion speaks to issues that are important in contemporary life. And, yes, they are swing voters; yes, they are a very important and probably pretty large group of undecided voters, and Democrats ought to go after them.

Q: Recent polls have suggested that the more often people go to church, the more likely they are to vote Republican. What do you make of that, and what can Democrats do about that?

A: Well, I think that's culturally true. I think if you have professed faith through a born-again experience as a Christian, the odds are you are more likely conservative, you are more likely Republican, you are probably more likely living in one of those red states that are more Southern and more Western. But, you know, at the same time, polls say that people who are struggling with faith, and I think that most of us do -- people who are struggling and ambivalent are very open to hearing discussions of values and religion from all across the political spectrum, including from Democrats. So I don't think there's any reason why Democrats ought to give up on the church and feel like we can only go after a secular vote.

Q: But the secular vote seems to be a base of the Democratic Party. Certain studies show that, just in that way that evangelicals might be a base for Republicans, seculars are a base for Democrats. Is there a danger of alienating that base?

A: I don't think so. I think that obviously there are some people who are just -- a faithful life or a community of faith is just not their bag. They're off playing golf on Sunday morning or doing something else. I think it's very important for Democrats we speak to, for a lot of those voters -- we have to hold them together. But, you know, part of what it means, particularly in the Christian faith, to be evangelical is to open the eyes up of people who maybe are not necessarily churched. And I think there are some real possibilities here. I'm struck by the fact that churches are one of the only places left in America where people of different political persuasions gather under one roof every week and listen to each other and talk to each other. That's very important to preserve. And I think if Democrats can create spaces for healthy dialogue and that happens in and around communities of faith and churches, that's a real opportunity. It's an opportunity to ... get more votes but also an opportunity to make more people aware of the good news that we spread prophetically because that's part of our religious calling.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
Q: What practical advice would you give to the Kerry-Edwards campaign specifically and to Democratic candidates in general?

A: Well, in general, when I've talked to my fellow Democrats on the subject, I say first and foremost, be genuine and be authentic. Don't fake it. Talk about your own experiences growing up, talk about the role religion played in your life. Talk about a favorite Sunday school teacher or someone who made a real impact, or a particular sermon that struck a note, or in your own private moments of devotion a scripture or prayer that's powerful for you, that speaks to you. I don't necessarily say people have to go out and pretend that they're Billy Graham, but I think at the same time they can bring to their discussion of important social issues, political issues, some sense that their faith informs the way they think about things. We get trapped very often saying that there's separation of church and state in America. There is, but there was no separation of faith and politics in the very founders who wrote it in the Constitution. They were deeply religious people, and I think, by and large, many people in the political sphere are more religious than they let the audience know sometimes. So letting your faith shine, and letting that light shine through and not hiding it under a bushel, is a very appropriate thing to do for people who are faithful.

Q: Is that message met with reluctance by some party leadership?

A: I think it's met with discomfort by some party leaders. I think some people are just not comfortable wearing their religion on the sleeve. And particularly, if you are imbued with certain Yankee taciturnity, like a certain candidate we have running for president, it's just not a natural thing to talk about a faith life, even though in the case of Senator Kerry he happens to be a particularly faithful person. But I think that, you know, breaking down that barrier and understanding that's a way in which we communicate some common interest with people that we are trying to reach -- that's a good thing to do, because it binds and heals people and brings people together. It makes those who are faithful and churchgoing people feel like they have something in common with different kinds of folk. And I think that's a good thing we can do in politics.

Q: What are some values, to use a buzzword right now, that Democrats this election season espouse that might have appeal for people of faith?

A: I think there's talk about war and peace issues. First, the way in which we use force and take up arms, which is a very troubling and deeply conflicted thing for those who are in the Christian faith. But talking about wars that are just and how you can appropriately defend yourselves, there's a whole rich vocabulary and moral reasoning that I would think is appropriate and would lend some real substance to the debate about Iraq. So that's one place. Another place is just, if we think prophetically of the Gospels and the Christian tradition and the call of Jesus to minister to those who are poor and dispossessed. If we look at the stories of who Jesus' ministry was aimed at, you know, you can't help but think, "Well, there is really the way in which we Democrats feel like we bring and inform the debate, with our own commitments to the poor and the homeless and the dispossessed." So, you know, those are places where I think we encounter real, live, active faith that would really speak to Americans now, and we ought to talk more about that.

Q: Do you expect religion to play a big role in this election?

A: No, not a big role, but I think that it's very appropriate that the question of faith and how faith informs the actions we take as political leaders -- I think that's a very appropriate subject. I'm glad that it's getting more attention. It's only one dimension of how we examine the personalities and characters of candidates who are running. So I wouldn't want it to supplant other things, but I think it's an important thing. I think we learn something about people as we hear them profess their own faith and talk about what matters to them and talk about their view of how their own spiritual life guides the way in which they think about important, substantive issues. This debate about red state, blue state Americans, the divisions that exist -- I mean, we have too much division in our political life as a country already. And the thing that strikes me about the church and most churches is that they are places where folks of different political viewpoints come together every week. And I think that if we can create a place for dialogue there about important issues, that will be a healing thing in our political system, which is very badly broken right now.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP