Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Profile
Web Exclusive
Survey

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

DISCUSSION:
The Pope and Interfaith Relations
April 8, 2005   
Read This Week's November 7, 2008
Go
Video - Watch this story
Requires Real Player
BOB ABERNETHY, anchor: John Paul certainly led the Catholic Church a long way in interfaith relations, Chester, but there's still a way to go, isn't there?

Dr. CHESTER GILLIS (Theology Professor and Chair, Department of Theology, Georgetown University): Well, there is. I think he did set a great benchmark in this area; remarkable accomplishments with all of the religions, and particularly with Judaism, but also with Islam, as the piece indicated. But even internal to Christianity there are still tensions, of course, between churches, between Protestants and Catholics, and some of those have long theological history, and sometimes there are disciplinary histories, and sometimes it's just a kind of bickering between them. Also, this pope had hoped to reunite Christianity itself in its divisions with the Orthodox position and the Roman Catholic position. He was unsuccessful with that, although he made heroic efforts to that end, but there are a lot of roadblocks for that. So there's still much work to be done, but he has given a vision of what we should be doing. And he's a person who wanted to engage in interreligious dialogue, which I think is largely the future of religions.

ABERNETHY: What do you mean by that - "largely the future of religions"?

Dr. GILLIS: Well, I think that, I think that it will be difficult, increasingly difficult in the 21st century for religions to live independently of one another. The Church is embedded in cultures in which there are many religions together. Take Asian Catholicism and African Catholicism, for example -- not so much Latin American -- and those people live side by side with peoples of other religions. It's important not simply to tolerate one another, but to understand one another. And to understand one another requires a sympathetic dialogue and a consistent dialogue between religions.

ABERNETHY: But look, Colleen, John Paul II believed deeply in the truth of Catholicism. Now, where, where is there in that, where is there room for respecting what other people, other religions feel is their truth?

Photo of COLLEEN CARROLL CAMPBELL COLLEEN CARROLL CAMPBELL (Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center): Well I think that his belief in the "splendor of truth," the title of one of his encyclicals, was not something that impeded his ecumenical efforts, but it was the very reason that they were so successful. He practiced a kind of highest-common-denominator ecumenism which is very different from what we very often see, kind of "I won't talk about my issues, you won't talk about yours." We just hold hands; we kind of ignore the big differences. He completely believed in the gospel of Jesus Christ. He believed that the Catholic Church most fully embodied the fullness of the Christian faith and that that was the way that God intended; but at the same time he could find the common ground and the same moral truths that he believed in Catholic tradition are accessible to everyone through reason -- that dignity of the human person, the sanctity of life.

ABERNETHY: But does that mean that for Protestants, for Jews, for Muslims, that we are sort of second-class citizens?

Ms. CARROLL CAMPBELL: I don't think we got that impression at all from the folks that were interviewed in the piece, and I think it's very important the way he did it. Again, it was based on truth that we could claim as our own and grappling together to come to some understanding of what truth is. Once we say that there is no truth, then it's just your opinion versus mine. I don't think that is charity or compassion. I think it's just a cop-out. And he refused to cop out that way.

ABERNETHY: John-Peter Pham?

Photo of John-Peter Pham and Abernethy Dr. JOHN-PETER PHAM (Professor, James Madison University): I have to respectfully disagree with that comment about -- in many respects, I think to achieve dialogue in this pontificate, certainly the pope is to be applauded for the tremendous strides that have been made in ecumenical and interreligious dialogue. But in certain areas one sees very clearly a pattern of a certain willingness not to engage in difficult issues. The one Islamic representative in this piece that we just saw spoke about all the apologies that were made by John Paul II, but we have yet to hear of anything about the rights of Christians who are driven out of Muslim countries in the Middle East. We really have not yet addressed the question -- and it needs to be addressed in the next pontificate -- about the changing demographic face of Europe. There are some European cities -- I read in one Italian study recently, Rome itself -- where there are more Muslims who attend the mosque on a given weekend than Catholics in churches. So I think there are some issues that were soft-pedaled in the interest of achieving political consensus as well as dialogue consensus, and some of those issues I think will have to be grappled with by the next pontiff.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
ABERNETHY: David, you wanted to get in.

DAVID GIBSON (Author, THE COMING CATHOLIC CHURCH): I just think it's interesting how the pope's record on interfaith and ecumenical relations really pointed up, in a way, what an almost radical kind of papacy his was. We all -- we're always throwing around these terms of how conservative he was or even orthodox, but many of his efforts, his initiatives -- the joint prayer service at Assisi that he held twice, his travels to a mosque, as we saw, to a synagogue -- caused a lot of consternation among some more tradition-minded Catholics and some very powerful cardinals. He really had to lobby and to -- with his, what I call his theology of apology there, in apologizing for the Inquisition, for the Crusades, for injustices against women, the various litanies that he ran down at the millennium. Those things created a lot of opposition on his right flank, and I think most notably, there was his apostolic letter, Ut Unum Sint, "That They May Be One," which was a letter directed, I think, mainly at the Eastern Orthodox, in which he volunteered to rethink, in some ways, the authority of the papal office. That was an extremely controversial step in many ways.

Photo of panel ABERNETHY: Okay, let me just push this question a little bit about the relations, for instance, between Catholicism and Protestants. As a Protestant, I can't take Communion in a Catholic church; does that mean that from the point of view of the Vatican, that I can't be saved unless I become a Catholic? Talk to me; explain this to me.

Dr. GILLIS: Well, there is a document that, actually, David's suggestion about the critics of the pope when he engaged in interreligious dialogue -- those critics could also be consoled by a document called "Dominus Jesus," which reaffirms the centrality of Christ for salvation. And sometimes theologians grapple with that document, trying to figure out what to do with that in [the] context of interreligious dialogue. But the Catholic Church does not hold that Protestants, for example, and others, even from other religions, cannot be saved.

LAWTON: But that document says that they are in a state of "grave deficiency."

Dr. GILLIS: It depends upon what part of the document you look at. The idea of the document -- there was historically the phrase --

ABERNETHY: But, Chester, do I have to become a Catholic in order to be saved?

Photo of CHESTER GILLIS Dr. GILLIS: No. Historically there was a St. Cyprian phrase, "extra ecclesiam nulla salus" -- "outside the Church, no salvation," second century -- [that] was followed by the Church for a long time, until the Second Vatican Council. But since the Second Vatican Council the notion has been that salvation is open to all, but the universal savior is Christ. So the efficacy of salvation is through Christ, but it is available to all humankind, which is a disposition that -- it's not condemning anyone to salvation, but it is, in a sense, for non-Christians, suggesting you are saved by our savior, and that has sometimes caused prickly relationships between religions.

Dr. PHAM: Bob, if I can pick up a little bit, both your comment and David's observation earlier about the radicalness of John Paul's dialogue with other Christians, as well as non-Christians. What's interesting is because the Catholic Church is a unique institution with a singular head, and other religious bodies aren't constructed that way in their own constitutions, what this papacy has found [is] that in order to engage in dialogue with another faith tradition, it has to engage in a broad-based dialogue with various constituencies within that. So perhaps, in a -- over the long term, that method of dialogue with broad constituencies, different and overlapping representative groups, might also filter back into Catholicism's own internal dynamics and internal dialogue.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP