Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories
Headlines
Election Coverage
Calendar
TV Schedule
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
For Teachers
Resources
Feedback

PERSPECTIVES:
Senate Confirmation Hearings on Samuel Alito
January 13, 2006    Episode no. 920
Read stories by week: 
Go
BOB ABERNETHY, anchor: This week, as Senate Judiciary Committee members questioned Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, religion was a frequent concern. Alito would replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who was often the deciding vote on contentious religious cases such as government displays of the Ten Commandments. Alito would also become the fifth Catholic on the current court, but, he told Illinois Democratic Senator Richard Durbin, his personal religious beliefs would not conflict with his duty to uphold the Constitution.

Photo of SAMUEL ALITO at Senate confirmation hearing Judge SAMUEL ALITO: My obligation as a judge is to interpret and apply the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and not my personal religious beliefs or any special moral beliefs that I have.

ABERNETHY: Analysis now of Judge Alito's testimony and his prospects for confirmation from Tim O'Brien, legal analyst for Fox News and a visiting professor of law at Nova Southeastern University. He joins us from Davie, Florida.

Tim, welcome. How did Judge Alito come down on the issues most important to the religious communities?

TIM O'BRIEN (Contributing Correspondent): He seems to follow the Supreme Court's lead scrupulously. A lot of people think he might be more sensitive to religious interests than Justice O'Connor. He has ruled that cities may have Nativity scenes at Christmastime in some contexts; that children can't be discriminated against in school if they want to express religious points of view; that Muslim police officers are entitled to wear beards, if that's part of their religious practice. Pretty much consistent with the Supreme Court -- and that's all we can say.

ABERNETHY: And how about abortion?

Mr. O'BRIEN: On abortion, Democrats tried to pin him down and have him say that Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land. Of course, so many questions about it indicated that it's not the settled law of the land. He went about as far as he could go, saying that precedent does count when it's been reaffirmed many times by the Supreme Court -- it's even stronger that there is a right to privacy in the Constitution.

Continue to top of next colum
Watch This Report
Requires Real Player or Windows Media Player
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
ABERNETHY: So do you expect him to be confirmed?

Mr. O'BRIEN: I do think he'll be confirmed. I think there will be some saber-rattling on the Senate floor. Democrats are very unhappy with some of his positions. It could be a party-line vote, but the Republicans have the votes.

ABERNETHY: And, Tim, let's assume he is confirmed. How much difference and in what ways is that going to make on the court itself?

Photo of TIM O'BRIEN Mr. O'BRIEN: I think it could make a significant difference in a number of areas, especially given that he would be replacing the swing Justice Sandra O'Connor. On abortion, Roe v. Wade is not about to be overruled, but his vote could strengthen the authority of the states to regulate abortion. And also, he seems to favor greater deference to the White House -- more presidential power, especially in the areas of national defense and foreign affairs.

ABERNETHY: Tim O'Brien, many thanks.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP