|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
Seismic records from a 1984 earthquake show how much stress different parts of a roof may endure. |
||||||||
Another system, under study at Buffalo and elsewhere, is based on a heavy weight inside the building that shifts in order to counteract swaying or twisting motions. When the building moves, pistons shift the position of the mass in the opposite direction. Some active systems are already in use to counteract the swaying of tall buildings caused by wind, which is unnerving to people inside and can even make them seasick. The Sendagaya INTES Building in Tokyo has such a system on its 11th floor, with one mass for counteracting swaying motions and another to resist twisting motions. Reinhorn believes that intelligent buildings are the way of the future in seismic engineering. One important advantage, he says, is the fact that a smart building can adapt to many types of ground motions -- possibly some unanticipated before the event. But, right now, building designers remain hesitant. One major issue is the reliability of the smart braces and the control systems. Should something break down in an actual quake, a building could suddenly become very dumb and very dangerous. For now, engineers will probably continue to build their high-rises and bridges like the stereotype of the football linebacker: not too bright, but really hard to knock over. |
||||||||
Drawing: Courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. |
||||||||
Article: All Stressed Out | Sidebar One: Learning from Earthquakes | Sidebar Two: Quake Prediction | Sidebar Three: Build Smart | ANIMATION |
||||||||