Academy Award-winning actor Sir Anthony Hopkins, who stars in “The Rite” and “Thor,” describes the origins of his acting career.
In a preview of tonight’s State of the Union address, Former Senator Bill Bradley explains how the unemployment rate impacts President Obama’s chances for re-election. Bradley suggests that President Obama would increase his chances of re-election if he guaranteed the unemployment rate will be at 7 percent the summer of 2012. Tavis pushes Bradley on whether unemployment will get anywhere near 7 percent by the presidential campaign season.
Watch the clip below, and view the full conversation here.
The first time that I went to a taping of Tavis Smiley was after getting back from lunch with my WNET team, and I saw Nas. As I glanced behind me, here was the “Illmatic” — as Tavis would greet him later — nonchalantly talking on the phone, without sunglasses. This was my cue to go on set.
(Watch Tavis’ conversation with Nas and Damian Marley.)
As I discovered, it’s the little details that make the show’s behind-the-scenes interesting: Nas and Damian Marley sitting silently watching the monitor and bobbing their heads to the beat, entranced by their song “As We Enter” as if they were hearing it for the first time. Venus Williams effortlessly elegant, changing into a pair of low-heeled ballerina pumps and covering her arms with a cropped, slightly military-style jacket as she sits down.
(Watch Tavis’ conversation with Venus Williams.)
But the thrill of being behind the scenes is witnessing the object of the interview unravel live as Tavis engages in a question/answer type of dialogue with different personalities. Witnessing it live is an experience very similar to the viewer’s, but with the added tension of the build-up to the interview.
What makes Tavis a great public broadcasting talent is his ability to be a catalyst for an in-depth exploration of a subject matter that is often disregarded for a more superficial and consensual approach. A prime example is when Tavis goes straight to the matter with his interview of Nas and Damian Marley introducing the “Distant Relatives” project as “an African heritage exploration.”
Just like he implies in one of his questions to Nas, it’s not a topic that the general public or regular hip-hop audience is particularly interested in. A couple of years earlier when he interviewed Nas on the controversy that surrounded his solo album, Tavis was probably the only interviewer to pronounce the “N” word when he explained to the audience “what Nas had originally intended to call the CD.”
Again, by calling a spade a spade, he enables the conversation to go beyond its more controversial aspect and settle in a more progressive realm.
Tavis’ approach is hermeneutic, like when he goes back and forth from Nas to Damian, keeping the audience and the interviewees on their toes, establishing a rhythm to the talk.
This approach was obvious with photojournalist Stanley Greene. I was curious to see how Tavis would translate into words the work of a cultural agent who produces a visual universe. Two impressions emerged from the interview. The first is that this was a great exercise of improvisation. After the last-minute briefing from his production team, it became clear that he’d made up his mind to focus on Greene’s work in New Orleans instead of his overall work.
My second impression is that he’d found and grabbed an angle that he just went at. To make the interview more visually appealing he focused on the material side of the photographer’s work: the traveling exhibition van, the objectified vision of the New Orleans disaster.
(Watch Tavis’ conversation with Stanley Greene.)
Again, I admired this ability to make the unseen visible. In this case I thought the material angle he chose was a good way to anchor the viewer’s attention, while at the same time bringing up the Katrina disaster that culminates with the airing of his own Tavis Smiley Reports episode “New Orleans: Been in the Storm Too Long.”
The interview with Oliver Stone was great to watch, as the attention was on the documentary South of the Border, arguably a subject with not too much headline appeal, instead of the eagerly awaited sequel to Wall Street. As a non-U.S. citizen, I thought it was a fascinating way to bring up U.S. foreign policy as the film itself was less in focus than what was discussed in the film. For Oliver Stone, it was a great platform to voice some of his opinions.
(Watch Tavis’ conversation with Oliver Stone.)
Again, Tavis’ approach to Oliver Stone was to ask him why the subject of Latin American politics was so important to talk about: “What are we are not being told?” The importance isn’t so much the biased — or unbiased — approach by Stone (Tavis alludes to it later when he says he enjoys controversy), but the talking about it. It just throws in a completely different perspective: “Six of these countries have gotten together with democratically elected presidents who are from the people, who came up from the roots, many of them poor.”
Finally, one of my greatest delights is to witness the interaction between Tavis and the production crew. From the recording booth to the set, they are like a family, where everyone knows their place, the atmosphere is always relaxed in between the takes, and once the recording starts, all the energies, including those of listeners like me, focus on the talk. On set, it isn’t rare to see Tavis bring up one of the crew members in the conversation and even, in some cases, in the shot — like when John Mellencamp was surprised by a producer with a cake. The Tavis Smiley show is especially the result of a great team effort.
Marguerite de Bourgoing moved from London to Los Angeles to complete a master’s in communication at University of Southern California. She is in the midst of producing her first documentary via LAStereo.TV, the multimedia hip-hop Web site she founded.
In a recent opinion piece in The New York Times, Ron Chernow, biographer and author of Washington: A Life, takes on the Tea Party’s attempts at identifying with the nation’s founders.
Chernow states in the opinion piece, “…any movement that regularly summons the ghosts of the founders as a like-minded group of theorists ends up promoting an uncomfortably one-sided reading of history.”
After the interview with Chernow about his new book, which aired Tuesday, October 12, Tavis continued the conversation by asking Chernow to address the topic of the opinion piece. That two-minute Web-exclusive conversation is available below.
You might be surprised at what the biographer reveals in the Web-exclusive — not about the Tea Party, but about the founders.
If you missed the broadcast, click here to watch the video of to watch Tavis’ full conversation with Chernow, and check out our Web-exclusive below.
“America is hemorrhaging talent. We can no longer waste the skills and dreams of countless young men and boys of color.”
That truth was echoed throughout a two-day national town hall in Los Angeles to address the health disparities facing boys and young men of color across California and the nation.
Researchers and community leaders at the town hall looked at how communities either foster or limit the life chances that young people have. Communities can give you access to resources like transportation, good schools, parks, health services and jobs. But communities can also expose young people to stressors — like crime, environmental hazards, unemployment and inadequate housing.
While these issues touch every part of our communities, they are particularly tough for boys and young men. This is because the bad policies and practices that institutionalize disadvantage, disproportionately affect boys and young men of color.
In particular, America’s growing preoccupation with crime has toughened schoolhouse policies to what might have been labeled “boyish” mischief in the past. Making a mistake is often more costly for boys.
Rather than making our schools better places to learn, boys and young men of color are more likely to do worse. Studies have linked suspensions to an increased likelihood that a young man of color will drop out, which means that he will find it harder to get a job, be more likely to be connected to crime and prison and less likely to be connected to community.
Of course, we want our children to grow up with a strong sense of responsibility to themselves, their families and their communities. But we must also take responsibility to protect them from harm and provide them with an open door to opportunity.
The first step is to recognize that place — homes, schools and neighborhoods — matters. The second is to change the policies and practices that shape place.
To do this, The California Endowment in partnership with PolicyLink is supporting work in three communities — Oakland, Fresno and Los Angeles — to build the leadership needed to overcome challenges facing boys and young men of color.
We will measure our success at achieving four big goals, which we see as the strongest indicators of a healthy community. These include ensuring that everyone has a healthy home (or usual source of care), reducing childhood obesity, reducing youth violence and improving school attendance.
Doing so will have positive implications for California and the nation.
The good news that emerged from the town hall is that we know how to keep a child in school; we know how to help a young man become a productive community member.
Getting there will not only require new policies, but new politics — particularly the courage to declare that America cannot afford to ignore the challenges facing young men of color. From workload to tax revenues to gross domestic product, the future of the nation depends on the very people who are often least prepared by their current conditions to shoulder the burden.
We know what we need to do. If we take action now and do it right, we can help not just young men and boys of color but all of us. Let’s invest in them — and let’s invest in ourselves.
Robert Phillips is the Director of Health and Human Services for The California Endowment. As director of the Health and Human Services program, Phillips leads the foundation’s efforts to develop initiatives to reduce barriers to efficient, effective functioning health systems that promote the health of low-income communities and communities of color.
Angela Glover Blackwell, Chief Executive Officer of PolicyLink, founded the organization in 1999 and continues to drive its mission of advancing economic and social equity. Under Blackwell’s leadership, PolicyLink has become a leading voice in the movement to use public policy to improve access and opportunity for all low-income people and communities of color, particularly in the areas of health, housing, transportation, education and infrastructure.
I didn’t expect to get this disease. Although my mother was diagnosed
with breast cancer in her thirties, I felt that I had mitigated my risk
by following the general guidelines for risk reduction. Babies before
thirty, check. Breastfeeding, check. Organic food, check.
But it happened, and at the age of 31, with my two
small children in my arms, I found myself standing in a shower with my
hand against my breast, listening to the alarm bells sounding in my head.
I knew something was not right, and sure enough, after a multitude of tests and the weary looks and invasive pokes
of many doctors, I was diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer.
When I was given the diagnosis of triple negative, I was confused and
(For more on this topic, check out Tavis’ conversation with Susan G. Komen for the Cure CEO Nancy Brinker.)
Never having heard of this type of breast cancer, my husband and I resorted to Google. A great idea when
you are doing research; not the best idea when you have the diagnosis
yourself. The first article my husband came across was about the high
rate of triple negative breast cancer in African-American women; the next article was about the aggressive nature
of the disease and the rate of recurrence and death among
I was horrified. Being a young African-American
woman, I was devastated to read these studies and find myself perfectly profiled. In those first few weeks following my
diagnosis, I felt like I was living in a tunnel, the world around me
darkened and the only way out was through a foreboding space with but a
glimmer of light at the end to lead me on.
But stumbling through the dark, I called upon the strength of my mother
and the strength of my people, and I reached out and asked for help; and
help arrived in droves. I told my doctors that I knew I could use my
connections and personal experience to aid other young women in their fight against triple negative breast
cancer. From those conversations and out of the darkness that had
encircled me, two flowers began to bloom, and I was strengthened by the
conviction that I would use my experience as a young woman of color battling the disease to reach out and provide
support and encouragement to others.
Exactly one year has passed since
my initial diagnosis, and now that the storm has died down, I can
reflect on my experience, and I feel a sense of calm. The flowers that bloomed out of the darkness are two women, who
happen to have the most lovely and symbolic last name I can imagine:
Lori and Carole Flowers. Lori and Carole lost their sister and daughter
Sheryl to triple negative breast cancer.
Together, Lori, Carole and I founded Triple Step for the Cure in memory
of Sheryl and my mother Pamela and in honor of all the women who have
battled this disease and those that continue the fight.
Triple Step for
the Cure is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Our mission is to raise awareness of triple negative
breast cancer, to support ongoing research into the disease and to
provide emotional and financial support to women diagnosed with the
disease. We also strive to empower women at risk in underserved communities to be proactive about their health to ensure
Too many women feel alienated from the healthcare
system and from caring for themselves. We are advocates for these women,
and we are working to bring to the forefront the importance of overall wellness in underserved communities.
Flowers, was a woman whom I unfortunately never had the chance to meet.
But, I know that she has taken root and is blooming in my life. And my
mother is here too. With their strength, we carry on our mission at Triple Step for the Cure.
Louisa Gloger is a 32-year-old survivor of triple negative breast
cancer. Inspired to fight the disease on a larger scale, she co-founded
Triple Step for the Cure.
Bedbugs are having a moment right now. Every day, it seems, brings another story about these hard-to-kill vermin infesting yet another, increasingly incredible place. Movie theaters, retail chains, office buildings. What’s next?
And, while experts agree that bedbugs are becoming a serious problem in this country, very little reportage on the phenomenon does more than instill panic in those of us with even a passing squeamishness about insect infestation.
This story, however, is different. Check out this interview with pest control expert Michael Potter, where he spoke to the bedbug menace in even-handed, informative terms. It’s required listening for anyone (like myself) with any concerns at all about coming into contact with bedbugs. After hearing the segment, you’ll probably still be concerned, but, more importantly, you’ll be informed. And probably a little less freaked out next time you check into a hotel.
Senior writer for Salon.com Rebecca Traister, whose first book Big Girls Don’t Cry traces the pivotal campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in the 2008 presidential election cycle, talked to Tavis about how the political landscape has changed for women in America in the past two years.
But in a second conversation that continued beyond the show and is available only on the Web (see below), Traister explains why, in the upcoming midterm elections, big Democratic losses would mean net losses for women in Congress.
“This could be the first time since the 1970s that the total number of women in congress actually decreases, which is very scary, and we need to pay attention to that,” Traister says.
Check out the clip here and share your comments below.
On August 31st, when President Obama announced the end of Operation Iraqi Freedom — the U.S. combat mission in Iraq — he was marking the end of a 7-year war that had taken the lives of more than 4,400 troops and cost U.S. taxpayers $750 billion.
While Iraq is still plagued with insurgent attacks, sectarian violence and political turmoil, most of the 144,000 U.S. troops that were in Iraq when Obama took office had already been withdrawn by the time he delivered his remarks from the Oval Office in August. 50,000 will remain to “advise and assist” Iraqi security forces until the end of 2011.
With reports that more than 35,000 Iraq vets have been seriously wounded during service and that a third of troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are reporting symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression or traumatic brain injury, we are left to wonder, what are the real stories of the service personnel returning from Iraq?
So, we want to hear from you. To share your story and be a part of our “Iraq: Faces of the Returning Troops” project, please e-mail the following to firstname.lastname@example.org:
1. A photo of yourself. *
4. City and State of residence
6. Dates of Deployment
7. Have you had any war injuries or needed medical treatment? If so, what has been your experience with treatment?
8. What have been the biggest challenges since you left Iraq?
9. Have you received adequate support?
10. What would you like your fellow Americans to know about life after serving in Iraq?
*By submitting your photo, you are granting us permission to use it on PBS.org and saying that you have the rights to do so. We can give credit if you supply us with the name of the person who took it. Please send as large a file as possible.
For more on the end of the U.S. combat mission in Iraq, check out Tavis’ recent conversations with London bureau chief for The New York Times John Burns, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist for the Washington Post David Finkel and (Ret.) U.S. Army Gen. Wesley Clark.
Have you ever heard a question that caught you off guard? Really made you pause?
A few years back, three questions rocked my world. They came from different people in the span of a month. The first question: Had you been a German Christian during World War II, would you have taken a stand against Hitler? Question 2: Had you lived in the South during the civil rights conflict, would you have taken a stand against racism? The third question: When your grandchildren discover you lived during a day in which 1.75 billion people were poor and 1 billion were hungry, how will they judge your response?
I didn’t mind the first two questions. They were hypothetical. I’d like to think I would have taken a stand against Hitler and fought against racism. But those days are gone, and those choices were not mine. But the third question has kept me awake at night.
I do live today; so do you. And we are given a choice…an opportunity to make a big difference during a difficult time. What if we did? What if we rocked the world with hope?
That’s one of the reasons I wanted to come out to talk to Tavis recently. Tavis is someone who believes we can all make a difference — whether you are a talk show host or a stay-at-home mom. And my message of outliving your life is a conversation I want to have with as many people as possible.
None of us can help everyone, but all of us can help someone.
Max Lucado is a renowned preacher, award-winning Christian writer and minister at San Antonio’s Oak Hills Church. His latest text is Outlive Your Life: You Were Made to Make a Difference.