Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Wide Angle human stories. global issues.
search
Home show finder watch online about the series global classroom

intro debate photo essay timeline resources
Soul of India

Debate - Two views of India's modern soul

Halting Communal Violence - What policies would you recommend for ending communal violence in India?

Sunil Khilnani - Professor of political science at Birkbeck College, Univeristy of London Subhash Kak - Professor of computer engineering at Louisianna State University


Dr. Khilnani's Response:
India is a secular democracy and since independence in 1947 the Indian state has been relatively effective in containing communal Violence. The numbers killed in such violence, prior to the current violence in Gujarat, were in the region of around 12,000. This is of course a terrible blot, but one needs to see it in the context of a 50-year period of profound social change and stress within a society of almost 1 billion people. The reason the Indian state can claim this success has much to do with the role and legacy of men like Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister: he was committed to combatting communal violence, and it was that deep personal commitment, even more than specific policies, which help to curb communal violence. Sadly, and very worryingly for the country, the personal commitments of India's current leadership is exactly the opposite. They are happy to use communal divisions to try to garner political support, and to foster violence. The basic architecture of the Indian state and constitution remains secular, but the men who now operate this structure are communal in their ideology and beliefs. This is the cause of much of the tension and strain which India is currently experiencing.

In terms of more immediate policy changes that would help ease communal tension, there are four I would suggest. First, to set aside the issue of the temple at Ayodhya and to make clear to Hindu activists that a temple cannot be built here; second, to subject Mr Modi [chief minister of Gujarat - ed.] and his government to public and legal scrutiny for his and its role in the Gujarat violence; third, to move with greater resolve towards opening a debate with disaffected Kashmiris to try to arrive at a compromise solution on the issue; and fourth, for Muslims in India to begin a debate over the place and content of Muslim civil law within the Indian legal system -- in particular, to recognize that the rights of Muslim women are currently heavily restricted by their subjection to the Sharia, and that a process of gradual reform must begin.



Dr. Kak's Response:
Communal violence often has an economic basis. Therefore, I would recommend redoubled emphasis on economic growth. I'd also recommend major administrative reforms for devolution of power to towns and communities, less bureaucracy, and electoral initiatives so that the citizens have a greater say in how their affairs are run. Many times communal violence is a response to frustrations and helplessness citizens feel in dealings with India's bureaucratic structures.


Dr. Kak's Rebuttal:
I couldn't disagree more with the notion that somehow Nehru's ideas -- however idealistic they might sound -- represent the best way to bring harmony. I don't think the Ayodhya temple or the Kashmir issue are the primary causes of disharmony; at best they are symptoms of a deeper malaise. To give an example from a different place, there is no emotive issue between America and the Arab world, yet September 11, 2001 happened.

The problem with Nehru's ideas is precisely his idealism. His policies were prescriptive: do this, put such and such thing on the table, remove such and such issue, and problems will be solved. But the real world is imperfect. To solve problems is to recognize the messiness of reality and then see what can be done.

I think the demonization by the left of the BJP is part of the problem. It reminds me of how Ronald Reagan used to be called a child-murderer by his political opponents in the 70s and the early 80s. The least academics should do is to understand both sides of the debate; otherwise they come down to the level of the propagandist and the rabble-rouser.





Dr. Khilnani's Rebuttal:
I agree with this as far as it goes. But one must add that communal violence is also encouraged and incited by politicians and extremists and with the BJP, the RSS (Hindu group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sing - ed.], and the umbrella "Sangh Parivar," we are dealing with organizations committed to spreading religious hatred and violence.



 
Related Show Features
Nation Divided Photo Essay - Trace India's post-Ayodhya religious strife.

India Timeline - Learn more about the history of relations between India's Hindus and Muslims.

Human Rights Atlas - Learn more about human rights in Mexico and its Central American neighbors.

Grozny Photo Essay - Take a walk through Chechnya's bombed-out capital, Grozny.

Kurdistan Map - See where Iraq's chemical attacks on Kurdistan took place, and why.

Chechnya Timeline - Discover the history that drives the Chechen separtist movement.

Mexico Photo Forum - Respond to photos that depict Mexico's struggle with human rights abuses and corruption.








Tools
email this page

© 2002-2007 Educational Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved. [an error occurred while processing this directive]