
Expedition
Log

|

|
A Panel Discussion
on Fisheries Management in the Bering
Sea
Summary by Julia
O'Malley
On Saturday, August 11 there
was a panel discussion in Dutch Harbor about the different
issues relating to fisheries management in the Bering Sea.
After an introduction by David
Policansky, Paul Larson, the mayor of Dutch Harbor,
introduced Frank Kelty, former mayor, long-time commercial
fisherman and current natural resource analyst for the city.
Kelty cited numerous statistics to show how Unalaska has
used its lucrative commercial fishing industry to help
strengthen the town. He predicted that with current resource
management, fisheries would remain productive. " Unalaska
has been a long-time proponent of conservation and
sustainable fisheries on the Bering Sea," Kelty said. "
Economy of our community depends on it."Kelty went on to
reference the Steller Sea Lion case, brought by conservation
groups against the National Marine Fisheries Service that
forced restriction of pollock fishing to protect endangered
sea lion populations. This, he said, was an example of poor
resource management. "The City has been active about
supporting research in the North Pacific for Steller Sea
Lions, we support sound science," he said. "We don't support
resource management that is based on lawsuits, personal
agendas or unsound scientific research."
|
Participants
in Dutch Harbor fish panel discussion.
Click
image for a larger
view.
|
The next panelist was Stephanie
Madsen, vice president of Pacific Seafood Processors
Association. She discussed the changes in the fishing
industry in Alaska over the last few decades, stressing that
the industry has moved progressively toward conservation.
"Alaska is the only state that says that fish should be
harvested by the sustainable yield principal," Madsen said.
She referenced the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries and
Conservation Act, that sets down the rules and regulations
for fisheries management in the US Exclusive Economic Zone.
The Act requires that fisheries be managed in a sustainable
way. "The fishing industry understands that times have
changed," she said, " As time goes on you see more and more
resources spent on sustainability."
Shirley Marquart of the At-Sea
Processors Association talked about mid-level trawlers,
boats that drag nets through the water, process and freeze
their catch. "Trawlers have gotten kind of a black eye in
the press," she said. "There is a myth that just because
they are big, they are bad." Marquart went on to say that
trawling was one of the cleanest forms of fishing. "Imagine,
these boats catch enough for fish to fill this room and ooze
out of the windows," she said, "Federal observers can come
and collect their by catch in a couple of little blue
buckets." Marquart concluded her argument, urging a
different attitude toward commercial fishing. "People talk
about how much commercial fishing takes from the water, but
one of the major question I think needs to be answered is,
'what about all that's left?'"
The next speaker was Emil
Berikoff of the Unalaska Native Fisheries Association. He
said, "Aleuts have been the original conservationists. We
have been taught to take only what we need and share the
rest with our neighbor. That's what's called subsistence."
He spoke against the Individual Fish Quota system that
splits total allowable catch between participating
fishermen, rather that allowing them to compete. "With IFQs,
it's like this boat is 4 hours away from port and they only
give you one gallon of gas, "he said.
The next speaker was Bob Storrs
of the Alaska Marine Conservation Coalition who began his
talk by saying that most of the pro-conservation moves the
fishing industry has made are because AMCC pushed them to do
so. He also countered Marquart's statement about trawlers
being clean. "I've fished just about every fishery in this
town and I can tell you that trawling, if done improperly,
can be real dirty." He continued, balancing his
pro-conservation statements with criticism of the
conservationist who brought the Sea Lion suit, saying that
they left and didn't try to "help take care of the people
left homeless by the house they burned down." Storrs went on
to discuss his concerns about the execution of the
rationalization system where officials decide who can take
fish and who much fish can be taken. "We see a real threat
made under the guise of rationalization," Storrs said. "Fish
don't belong to big companies, they belong to the United
States of America and, if you will, God.
(top)
|

|