A Panel Discussion
on Oil and Alaska's Search for Economic Diversity and
Environmental Protection
Summary by Julia
O'Malley
When the panel convened on
July 31, 2001 to discuss economic development, Mead
Treadwell of the Anchorage-based development group,
Institute of the North, introduced the theme that would
carry throughout -- Alaska is a resource-rich state, he
said, but all development requires careful consideration and
compromise. Treadwell used a triangle diagram to illustrate
this. On it he gave equal importance to considerations of
biological sustainability, economic sustainability and
social equity.
The next speaker, possibly the
most extreme in support of major oil and gas development,
was state oil and gas economist Dan Zobrist who opened his
talk with this statement: "Let's have a reality check, for
the last 20 years oil has paid for everything in this
state."
Zobrist went on to discuss how
the Alaskan economy is mostly dependent on oil as well as
what he saw as bright prospects for further oil and gas
development. He ended his talk with the conclusion that "oil
and gas have tremendous benefits, but they also have a
cost."
"That's right," continued Molly
McCammon, of the Oil Spill Trustee Council, "There is a cost
for oil and the spill is that cost."
McCammon discussed the lasting
impact of the 1989 oil spill that devastated parts of Prince
William Sound. "There is still oil in the food chain 12
years later. In certain localized areas populations are
stressed -- if something were to happen on top of that --
like another spill -- that could put the area into a
tailspin."
One part of the spill that is
sometimes overlooked is the economic boom it created, she
said.
"Exxon spent two billion dollars
cleaning it up. It created a class of what we called
'spillionaires' -- people who made a lot of money cleaning
up the oil."
She stressed that with
development can come many unexpected impacts on the
environment that will go on to effect the economy, like the
way the spill, an unexpected impact of oil development, has
negatively affected fisheries. McCammon also said that many
of the spill impacts are subtle and long lasting, but that
because of the many factors that influence animal
populations, they are hard to link indisputably with the
spill.
The next panelist was Jamie
Kenworthy, the executive director of the Alaska Science and
Technology Foundation. Kenworthy talked about what he termed
the political culture of Alaska where Alaskans, he said,
seem to feel like an economic colony of the Lower
48.
"Alaskans see themselves as
bemused outsiders," Kenworthy said, "It is like we live in
someone else's park."
Kenworthy continued to discuss
what he saw as a romanticized view of nature that stands in
the way of the realistic necessity to develop.
"We have a model of nature in
stasis and we think of it without humans
We think of
the environment as being fragile, but we don't think of the
economy as being fragile."
Bernice Joseph, the Deputy
Commissioner of Economic Development, spoke about the role
of Native Corporations in the Alaska economy.
"Alaska Native corporations are
the largest private land owners in the country," she said,
"Native corporations here are very different than other
corporations. If you look at Native corporation mission
statements, you'll see that the main goal is to protect the
social and economic welfare of our shareholders as well as
the land base."
Native corporations, Joseph
said, must think not only about the bottom line, but also
about public and cultural health. They have special benefits
for Elders and their shareholders may not sell their stock.
Part of their earnings go directly to Native communities. To
illustrate this, she gave herself as an example.
"If it weren't for the support
of DOYON Corporation with scholarships for school, I
probably wouldn't be here today."
Once again, Joseph stressed the
theme of compromise, citing Treadwell's triangle
diagram.
"In the business decisions we
make, we still have to weigh how it will effect our
shareholders," she said.
Anne Castellina, Superintendent
of Kenai Fjords National Park, was the last to speak to the
topic of land management and eco-tourism.
"Running a national park is like
being at the center of a balancing act," she said, talking
about weighing the park's popularity against a need to
protect wildlife from too much disruption. Park use rose
from 60, 000 to 290,000 visitors a year in the last 13
years, she said.
Castellina also talked about how
the increased tourism has effected the town of Seward, the
largest portal to the Kenai Fjords.
"With this park, it's like
McDonald's, if you build it they will come. All of this has
brought economic viability but we've also lost something,
too in terms of our way of life -- Seward has become a
seasonal town, which is all part of the compromise," she
said.
(top)
|