{"id":15127,"date":"2017-04-20T08:35:57","date_gmt":"2017-04-20T16:35:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/independentlens\/?post_type=blog&p=15127"},"modified":"2023-09-19T13:49:38","modified_gmt":"2023-09-19T20:49:38","slug":"filmmaker-ferne-pearlstein-last-laugh","status":"publish","type":"blog","link":"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/independentlens\/blog\/filmmaker-ferne-pearlstein-last-laugh\/","title":{"rendered":"Ferne Pearlstein Asks Comedians and Survivors: What Is Off-Limits in Comedy?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cSomebody once said, \u2018Tragedy plus time equals comedy.\u2019 And I always felt, why wait?\u201d – Comedian Gilbert Gottfried, in The Last Laugh<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There have been many films about the Holocaust, many good and important and extremely necessary films, but The Last Laugh<\/em> is likely the first to include comedians like Mel Brooks, Larry Charles, Judy Gold, and Sarah Silverman, and focus on the use of humor as a survival mechanism. The film by Ferne Pearlstein, produced with her collaborator-husband Robert Edwards, also touches on larger issues around taboos in comedy, asking “What is truly off limits?”<\/p>\n

The Last Laugh<\/em> is an “insightfully open-ended inquiry into the role of humor as it relates to unspeakable tragedy,” wrote the Village Voice<\/em>‘s Nick Schager, while Variety<\/em>‘s Dennis Harvey praised the “mix of levity, serious themes, marquee names and archival materials in Ferne Pearlstein’s entertaining, thought-provoking documentary.”<\/p>\n

Pearlstein, a longtime documentary cinematographer who directed the Independent Lens<\/em> film\u00a0Sumo East and West,<\/em><\/a> spoke to us about what drew her to make a film about laughing in the face of\u00a0the darkest topics, on humor in her own home growing up, and on what led Mel Brooks to kiss her cheek.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Why did you want to make <\/b>The Last Laugh<\/i><\/b>?<\/b><\/p>\n

In 1991 an old friend, Kent Kirshenbaum, and I were in Miami with a group of journalists who were being given a tour of the city\u2019s then-new Holocaust Memorial, led by an elderly survivor. We had both just finished reading Art Spiegelman\u2019s Maus<\/em> and Kent asked our guide what she thought of it. She replied with an emphatic, \u201cYou cannot tell this story through the funny pages! There was nothing funny about the Holocaust!\u201d We explained that we agreed with her, but although Maus<\/em>\u00a0used a comic form, the story of Spiegelman’s father surviving Auschwitz was told with complete reverence and was not funny at all. The only humorous moments were perhaps darkly told in the complicated interactions between Art and his father in the present-day story. But the survivor was not moved. <\/span><\/p>\n

Kent went on to ask: “Have you read it?” to which she angrily replied, “No!” That moment stuck with us, as we were both people who were drawn to a certain dark humor. The following year we both went off to graduate school to pursue our different degrees. While Kent was getting his PhD and I was getting my Masters in Documentary Film from Stanford, he wrote a 25-page paper called \u201cThe Last Laugh: Humor and the Holocaust” which he handed to me in the spring 0f 1993 and said, “Make this into a movie!” It took me 18 years to raise the money to finally make the film.<\/span><\/p>\n

What were some of the biggest challenges you faced in making this film?<\/b><\/p>\n

There were many challenges. Raising money for this controversial topic was nearly impossible. Understandably, no one wanted to offer what might look like an endorsement of the idea that “it\u2019s okay to laugh at the Holocaust,” even though that was not at all what we were saying. In the end, my funding came from one wonderful private donor who believed in me and what I set out to do.<\/span><\/p>\n

Another challenge was getting the first comedian to say yes. In the beginning, we got a lot of: “Great idea! Let me know when someone else comes on board!” I don\u2019t think they were afraid of the topic, as they all deal with this type of humor in their work, but I definitely had to gain their trust and prove that I would deal with the subject in a tasteful way. <\/span><\/p>\n

When we finally did get our first start-up money\u201418 years after my friend handed me the academic paper that was the inspiration for the film\u2014we went to my husband\/producing partner\u2019s agent who immediately called Rob Reiner and asked him if he would agree to be interviewed. And Rob said: “Sure. How\u2019s a week from Wednesday?” So that jump-started everything. <\/span><\/p>\n

Rob Reiner is so beloved and lent so much credibility to our project that we were then able to get a number of comedians based on his involvement. Among them were his father Carl Reiner and others like Susie Essman, Harry Shearer, Alan Zweibel, David Steinberg, Gilbert Gottfried, and Judy Gold. And with each new interviewee, we built our credibility and were able to get more and more people to agree. We had compiled a long list of comedians and artists who used taboo humor (and\/or specifically Holocaust humor) in their work. From this master list, there were some people we knew we couldn\u2019t make the film without\u2014such as Mel Brooks\u2014so in those cases, we had to keep finding new and creative ways to approach them until they agreed. <\/span><\/p>\n

Mel Brooks took a few years, a few very close connections, and a lot of luck to get him to finally say yes. But once we had Mel, his participation and support really opened doors. He helped us get Sarah Silverman, who was also on our “must-have” list and also very hard to get, by personally appealing to her via email. We remain eternally indebted to him for that, and of course so much more!<\/span><\/p>\n

And what about the challenges of putting together the film itself?<\/strong><\/p>\n

I hadn\u2019t imagined how hard it would be to keep up with current events… year after year, more existing taboos were being broken and new ones emerging, and more events happening that cut to the heart of the film.<\/pullquote>Artistically speaking, my big struggle was in the editing, even though the final film is very close to my initial vision. I had a strong sense of what I wanted before I started shooting and we set out to shoot material to fit that vision. Partially that was the result of spending so much time\u2014years, really\u2014thinking about the project and writing outlines and proposals before we ever began production. And I was adamant that I didn\u2019t want this to just be a talking heads-and-clips film. I always wanted to interweave a cinema verite<\/em> thread (which turned out to be a portrait of an Auschwitz survivor) with interviews and archival. I thought of the interviews as functioning sort of like a Greek chorus. <\/span><\/p>\n

The struggle came from the fact that it worked much better on paper than in practice, as it was very hard to strike the right balance without it feeling like I was intercutting two totally different films. So it was definitely a challenge to weave those two stylistic threads together and make them feel like one seamless film. But I just kept at it and didn\u2019t give up on my vision until I felt it finally worked. In that effort, it was important to me to surround myself with edit consultants and filmmaking peers, as well as people within the Holocaust community, who helped guide me toward my vision, including Karen Sim (Nothing Left Unsaid: Gloria Vanderbilt & Anderson Cooper<\/em>) and Mark Becker (Art and Craft<\/em>).<\/span><\/p>\n

I hadn\u2019t imagined how hard it would be to keep up with current events. With each new shoot, year after year, more existing taboos were being broken and new ones emerging, and more and more events happening that cut to the heart of the film\u2026 from rape jokes by Daniel Tosh, to jokes about the Boston Bomber, to the Charlie Hebdo tragedy, to the arrest of the anti-Semitic French comic Dieudonne in the wake of those attacks, and on and on. As new taboos were being broken, the tolerance for using satire and making taboo jokes about difficult topics had changed over time\u2014sometimes dramatically. So the theme of this film was very much a moving target that was constantly evolving even as I was making the movie.<\/span><\/p>\n

Is there anyone from the past, no longer with us, that you would’ve loved to include talking about this? (If we could bring them back just for the documentary!)<\/b><\/p>\n

Well, sadly, we were supposed to interview Joan Rivers, and it was a serious heartbreak for us and the film that we couldn’t. Joan was one of the first people to say yes back in the fall of 2011, but she was always so busy working it was nearly impossible to pin her down with a time. We finally were able to schedule an interview with her for October 1, 2014, and as you know, she tragically died two weeks before that date arrived.<\/span><\/p>\n

How did you gain the trust of the Holocaust survivors featured in your film?<\/b><\/p>\n

Having the support of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Museum of Tolerance, and advisers like Professor Michael Berenbaum and Rick Trank went a long way toward establishing our bonafides. And Renee Firestone is so well-known and so well-regarded in the community of Holocaust survivors and scholars that her involvement was an invaluable stamp of approval. Once a given individual agreed to participate, it was up to me to win them over and draw them out one by one as I began talking with them.<\/span><\/p>\n

Once I began speaking to Renee and other survivors, I was surprised by how important laughter was within the community and how much it actually contributed to their healing. I don\u2019t necessarily mean laughing about their experiences in the camps\u2014although I was also surprised by the number of stories I heard about those experiences\u2014but their ability to maintain any sense of humor at all. <\/span><\/p>\n

Deb Filler talks about it in the film, addressing a survivor who had a number of humorous stories from the camps: \u201cMy father saw it too\u2014that there was a possibility in the camps to make a joke or a sketch or a laugh.\u201d Carl Reiner agrees, referring to people who have a natural instinct to make jokes: If you were funny before, you\u2019ll be funny during, and you\u2019ll be funny after.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Can you tell us how Renee is doing these days? And how did Elly feel about the film after she saw it? Is she any more open to humor about her experiences, or have any insight about herself?<\/b><\/p>\n

Renee is doing <\/span>incredibly well<\/span>. She just turned 93 on April 13th! She continues to travel and speak all over the country both <\/span>about<\/span> the Holocaust and other genocides, as well as <\/span>traveling<\/span> with <\/span>T<\/span><\/em>he Last Laugh<\/em>.<\/span>\u00a0In fact, last month, after the film had its West Coast theatrical <\/span>premiere in Los Angeles, the next day she immediately hopped on a plane for Seattle where she was honored for her work helping Hurricane Katrina victims.<\/span><\/p>\n

Elly\u2019s response to the film was one of the most gratifying of all. <\/span><\/p>\n

I was very concerned that she might be offended by the film. So when we had our festival premiere at last year\u2019s Tribeca Film Festival I invited her, but not without reminding her about the premise of the film. She felt very strongly about coming to the premiere, and stood onstage with me after the screening and in front of the crowd complimented us for making such a “thoughtful and tasteful film.” Then she went on to say in a very grandmotherly way that she was sure it would win many awards, and then asked us for tickets to the next show! So that was very poignant for me.<\/span><\/p>\n

Did anyone in your own family tell taboo-busting jokes?<\/strong><\/p>\n

My younger brother was one of those funny people who knew those dark “too soon” jokes immediately after something terrible hit the news…which is especially interesting to me now because this dates back to before the Internet. We discussed this concept a lot with Gilbert Gottfried (though it\u2019s on the editing room floor). How did those jokes get around so quickly pre-Internet? And where did they come from?<\/p>\n

What else would you have liked to include in your film that didn\u2019t make the cut?<\/b><\/p>\n

There were so many things; I always remark that this film could have been a six-part series. For instance, there is a scene that uses an animated version of Mel Brooks and Carl Reiner\u2019s famous 2000 Year Old Man<\/em> bit, while Carl and Mel ponder what the 2000 Year Old Man might have said had he met Hitler. We also had a longer section that delved deeper into the First Amendment aspect of our topic, featuring a lengthy interview with Martin Garbus, who was Lenny Bruce\u2019s attorney (among other famous free speech cases he\u2019s handled). And we had a much longer section on Dieudonne, the controversial French comedian who has been arrested repeatedly for the anti-Semitic content of his act. It was fascinating, but it just took too long to set up.<\/span><\/p>\n