Daily News Lesson

SHOW ALL

Nov. 2, 2023, 2:53 p.m.

Supreme Court takes on cases involving public officials blocking social media followers

Summary

The Supreme Court heard arguments in two key cases about how public officials use social media. The cases explore whether two school board members in California and a city manager in Michigan violated the First Amendment by blocking constituents from posting criticism on their personal social media pages. Geoff Bennett discussed the stakes with NewsHour Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle.

For a transcript, click here.

Time codes

0:26 — Interview with Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle

1:39 — Interview with James Freed, city manager in Port Huron, Michigan

2:03 — Interview with Kevin Lindke on his opposition with James Freed

News wrap alternative: Check out recent segments from the NewsHour, and choose the story you’re most interested in watching. You can make a Google doc copy of discussion questions that work for any of the stories here.

Warm up questions

  • Who is James Freed?
  • What was James Freed's reasoning for blocking Kevin Lindke?
  • When did this take place?
  • Why did Lindke think the blocking was unjust?
  • Which amendment did Lindke use as reasoning in his response?

Focus questions

How does social media allow for people to interact who otherwise wouldn't? Do you believe these changes represent a positive or a negative outcome for society?

Media literacy: Who else would you want to hear from who was involved in the case to better understand it?

Alternative: See, Think, Wonder: What did you notice? What did the story make you think? What story would you want to find out more about? Where would you go to learn more?

For more

What students can do: Discuss as a class — do you think that Freed was in the right to block Lindke? How has social media changed the way courts might interpret the First Amendment?

As a class, also consider reading the following article on a class action suit against Meta for damaging young people's mental health with social media. Discuss — do you think social media companies should be held liable or responsible for the content on their platforms? Why or why not?

More than 40 states sue Meta claiming its social platforms are addictive and harm children’s mental health

Headquarters of Facebook parent company Meta Platforms Inc in Mountain View
Morning commute traffic streams past the Meta sign outside the headquarters of Facebook parent company Meta Platforms Inc in Mountain View, California, U.S. November 9, 2022. REUTERS/Peter DaSilva

Fill out this form to share your thoughts on Classroom’s resources. Sign up for NewsHour Classroom’s ready-to-go Daily News Lessons delivered to your inbox each morning.

SUPPORTED BY VIEWERS LIKE YOU. ADDITIONAL SUPPORT PROVIDED BY:

Copyright © 2025 NewsHour Production LLC. All Rights Reserved

Illustrations by Annamaria Ward