Daily VideoFebruary 25, 2015
Obama vetoes Keystone Pipeline expansion
President Obama has vetoed a bill that would approve the Keystone Pipeline expansion, a project causing fierce debate between Republican lawmakers and environmentalists.
The bill would have given the green light to a plan extending the Keystone Pipeline to transport tar sands oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast. The proposal requires government approval.
The legislation failed to adequately consider how expanding the pipeline could affect the “national interest,” Obama wrote in his veto.
Environmental groups say that building the extension and producing the oil are bad for the environment, but proponents say the pipeline would provide a reliable source for oil, decreasing the cost of oil for U.S. consumers.
The debate over the pipeline is the wrong conversation to prioritize, Jeremy Symons, senior director for climate policy at the Environmental Defense Fund, said.
“We should be focusing instead on the real energy issues in front of the country, which is how we move forward with a clean energy future for America,” he said.
But blocking the project will not help the future of clean energy; it will force the oil to come in through other pathways, according to Robert Bryce, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. “The idea that blocking this pipeline is going to prevent oil from getting to market is simply false,” he said.
This veto is Obama’s first in five years and only the third of his presidency. To override the veto, a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate would have to vote against Obama, but Republicans lack the necessary votes, according to Reuters.
Warm up questions
- What is a “fossil fuel”?
- Where does oil in the U.S. come from?
- How could providing more oil to the U.S. decrease its cost?
Critical thinking questions
- What are some reasons for supporting or opposing the pipeline? How should people decide which of these to prioritize?
- Consider the debate from several different viewpoints. How would you feel about the pipeline as a landowner in a state where the pipeline would be built? An energy company? A climate scientist? A lawmaker?
- Jeremy Symons said that the government is having the wrong debate on the pipeline, and should instead be focusing on clean energy alternatives. What are some of these alternatives, and how can the U.S. move forward with them?
Tooltip of related stories
Tooltip of more video block
Submit Your Student Voice
Discuss how competing interests may be putting conflicting pressures on schools planning their fall reopenings. Continue reading
After years of activist pressure, some sports franchises are formally considering name changes. Why do these name changes matter? Continue reading
How can students cultivate good outcomes for themselves and their communities through social media? Continue reading
Examine shifts in public policy and plans for the fall as coronavirus cases ramp up in mid-summer. Continue reading
In this lesson plan, uncover the hidden economy behind our quarantine takeout orders. Continue reading