|
Moderate, but Solidly
Democratic
By Professor Howard Reiter of University of Connecticut
Like its southern New England neighbors, Connecticut is a predominantly
Democratic state. Although it has had a Republican governor, John G. Rowland,
since 1995, he is only the second Republican to hold the office since
1954. Democrats occupy all four statewide offices below governor and lieutenant
governor, control both houses of the state legislature, and claim both
United States Senators and four of the state's six members of the U.S.
House of Representatives.
On the whole, the state's politics are ideologically moderate. By most
measures it ranks first or second in the nation in personal wealth, but
has some of the poorest cities. This latter fact is in part due to the
inability of Connecticut's cities to absorb their suburbs. The state's
economy, which was for a long time dependent on insurance and defense
contractors, has had to adapt to turmoil in both those industries. As
a consequence of all these developments, the issues that concern the state's
voters are similar to those of the nation as a whole: economic growth,
education, taxation, and the plight of the cities. As in most of New England,
the religious right has been almost invisible in Connecticut, and its
agenda has not been a factor in the state's politics.
For the past fifty years, Connecticut has been a bellwether in presidential
elections, failing to back the winner only in 1968 and 1976. This makes
prognostication about 2000 very difficult. The only statewide race in
2000 will be Senator Joseph Lieberman's bid for a third term. Popular
among fellow Democrats and conservative enough to assuage Republicans,
Lieberman is widely regarded as a safe bet for re-election; Republicans
have been having a difficult time finding an opponent. All but one of
the state's U.S. Representatives are also considered heavy favorites.
The exception is James Maloney, a Democrat from the traditionally swing
5th District (Waterbury, Danbury, and Meriden). He won his second term
in 1998 by only 2,343 votes, and his opponent, Mark Nielsen, is planning
a rematch. Both national parties are giving this race a high priority.
All seats in Connecticut's General Assembly are up in 2000, and the results
will have implications for national politics: The 2000 Census is expected
to cost Connecticut one House seat, and the ensuing reapportionment will
be closely watched.
The Democratic party is divided between liberals, such as Senator Christopher
Dodd and Representatives Rosa DeLauro (New Haven region) and Sam Gejdenson
(eastern Connecticut), and moderates, including Senator Lieberman and
Representatives Maloney and John Larson (Hartford area). After the 1998
elections Dodd and others unsuccessfully tried to oust the state chair,
Edward Marcus, considered part of the party's old guard. No resistance
to Lieberman's renomination is anticipated. The presidential primary could
result in a Bradley victory; while Gore has long been popular with the
party's establishment, Connecticut Democrats have often voted for insurgents
in their presidential primary (Kennedy in 1980, Hart in 1984, Brown in
1992).
True to their regional image, Connecticut's Republicans stand to the
left of their party, especially on social issues. Rowland has been a far
more pragmatic and less conservative governor than he had been as a member
of Congress, and Representatives Nancy Johnson (northwestern Connecticut)
and Christopher Shays (southern Fairfield County) are prominent members
of their party's moderate wing. Rowland has been one of many governors
to endorse Bush, whose father of course has roots in the state, and there
is no reason at this point not to consider Bush the heavy favorite in
the presidential primary.
|






 |