Next, urban morphology, or the three-dimensional structure of a city, also contributes to increasing temperatures, since tall buildings are particularly good at trapping heat between them. And lastly, there’s waste heat, another double whammy. The process of consuming energy to do work, by anything from a car engine to a lightbulb to a computer, generates heat as a byproduct. Since cities are where most humans live together, they’re also where we consume the most energy: for transit, heating and cooling our homes, and the myriad electrified activities of daily life. And the waste heat that escapes into the environment from those activities measurably affects city temperatures.

Urban heat islands and human health

As all of those factors accumulate, the consequences for human health add up, too. Human bodies can handle very hot temperatures briefly but are sensitive to heat over the long term. “It's the warm nighttime temperatures that cause the health problems,” Marshall Shepherd, director of the atmospheric sciences program at the University of Georgia, told NOVA. “And that's where the urban heat island comes in, because that's when it tends to peak”— with all those mineral surfaces re-releasing heat after dark.

Our bodies respond to heat by elevating our heart rate, allowing us to better circulate moisture. That moisture becomes sweat, which we use to cool ourselves down. Most people can handle an elevated heart rate for a few hours a day. But “if you have to elevate your heart rate for 24 hours because it's 85 degrees at night in your home, then you are overly taxing your physiologic capacity to deal with heat,” Stone said. Then things start to get dangerous. 

Research shows that it’s generally the neighborhoods that can least afford it that get hit the hardest by urban heat. That’s in part because of discriminatory urban planning policies like redlining, which ensured that poorer neighborhoods had fewer trees and more industrial development. One recent study found a difference of 7 to 10 degrees between lower and higher income areas of the same cities. In another project, Shepherd and his colleagues compared redlining maps with satellite data tracking heat. The results showed “a clear heat island within the heat island for marginalized groups,” he said.

Support Provided By
Learn More

What can we do about it?

With Phoenix’s heat-related death rate doubling in just five years, the city went into crisis mode in 2021. Nighttime temperatures in Phoenix average about 10 degrees hotter than they were half a century ago, hovering around 85 degrees during the hottest part of the year. And there are some days when “we've measured pavement, for example, at 160 Fahrenheit, 170 Fahrenheit,” Hondula said, with similar numbers on, for example, metal playground slides—a temperature that can cause direct burns. 

As he’s stepped into his role managing the city’s heat crisis, Hondula has remained hopeful. Phoenix’s trends aside, “we've seen decreasing heat-associated deaths over the past several decades, as our planet has been warming,” he said. He attributes that to increased understanding of the urban heat island effect, which is beginning to lead to meaningful change in many cities.

One place to start: more trees. Large cities such as Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Philadelphia, and New York currently average around 25%-40% tree canopy cover but could support up to 60% cover, the U.S. Forest Service has found. Even arid Phoenix has committed over $7 million to planting drought-tolerant trees over the next few years. Similar non-profit organizations all over the world have committed to planting trees in the coming decades: 170,000 in Paris, 1 million in Atlanta, 1 million in São Paulo, 4 million in Houston. 

Two adults talk while walking toward the camera through two rows of small trees in a grassy park

Professor David Sailor (left) and Professor Na'Taki Osborne Jelks (right) walk through a "cool corridor," where trees have been planted to provide relief from the heat in Phoenix, Arizona. Image courtesy of GBH

But it will take years, maybe decades, for those trees to mature and start making a difference. So Stone also sees great potential in changing the materials we use to build cities. For example, dark-colored slate roof shingles with high thermal capacity might make sense in London, or somewhere else cold and wet, but are much less logical in the southern United States. “We can engineer any color we'd like of roofing material, and so part of what we need is not just a technological change in the way we build, but a cultural shift to be more accepting of lighter, more reflective materials,” he said. Other more immediate solutions include initiatives like Phoenix’s cool pavement program, which encourages the use of alternative road materials, as well as the city’s work prioritizing shade structures at bus stops or in other places where trees might not be suitable.

The powerful thing about recognizing the heat island effect is recognizing it as a phenomenon within local control. That means it’s possible to make progress without waiting for national or international policy change, Stone said. Research shows “we can substantially cool down cities in a relatively quick period of time without major expenditures.” 

Hondula takes this optimism even further. Even in the context of global warming, he said, efforts to increase tree and other shade cover and promote use of materials with lower thermal capacity mean “we could wind up with a city of the future that's cooler than the one we have today.”

WATCH: WEATHERING THE FUTURE

Receive emails about upcoming NOVA programs and related content, as well as featured reporting about current events through a science lens.

Share this article