A male medium ground finch (left) next to a female small ground finch (right). It's unclear what the nature of their relationship is—but if the male is small for his kind, love could blossom. Photo Credit: Nick Athanas, flickr

When Looking for Love, Darwin’s Finches Choose Mates Just Like Their Parents

<p>“Wow, you look just like my father” can be a surefire way to bring a date to a screeching halt. Unless, that is, you have hollow bones and live on a remote Pacific island.</p><p>Today, in the journal <i>PNAS,</i> researchers <a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1813662115">report</a> that the famous finches once studied by Darwin on the Galápagos Islands tend to choose mates that bear an uncanny resemblance to their parents. This strategy helps ensure that birds boost their chances of bunking up with partners of their own species—and may even help solve an age-old evolutionary puzzle.</p><p>On the small sliver of Earth that Darwin’s finches call home, <a href="https://www.princeton.edu/news/2017/11/27/study-darwins-finches-reveals-new-species-can-develop-little-two-generations">18</a> <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2017/11/20/science.aao4593">species</a> of these birds speckle the skies. Each lineage has its own little quirks. For instance, the shapes and sizes of different finch beaks have been whittled around specific foods: Some more suited to crack open little seeds, while others are particularly adept at pecking at cacti.</p>
<div class="ad"></div>
<p>But it was only in the last million years or so that these diverse lineages truly start to crystallize. Even today, their distinguishing features are few and far between—which means breeding season can be a chaotic cross between speed dating and a family reunion. For years, biologists have wondered how so many finch lineages diverged in such close proximity, in such a short amount of time. Without geographical barriers to keep species separate, how did birds avoid interbreeding?</p><p>Luckily for finches, they’re born with the most reliable role models nature can provide: their parents. By simply paying attention to the subtle features and habits of their primary caretakers, little finches can begin to acquire a sense of their species identity—and which subtle features distinguish one lineage from another. This time-sensitive process of learning is called imprinting.</p><p>Some imprinted traits are vocal. When a male finch is single and ready to mingle, he can’t be a slouch with song: His winsome, species-specific warble is a big part of what will ultimately woo a female. But young birds aren’t born belting arias. Each male must earn his vocal heritage by studying dutifully under his father’s tutelage during his youth. Because these serenades are sung or recognized on a lineage-by-lineage basis, they help maintain finch fidelity—but imprinting is far from foolproof. If impressionable young males are exposed to the vocal stylings of another species during this period, they may spend the rest of their lives chasing the wrong tail.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Geospiza_scandens_female.width-990_W9U8GOJ.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>A female cactus finch. When it comes time for her to select a mate, she may trend towards choosing with with a beak shaped like her father's. Photo Credit: Sergey Pisarevskiy, flickr</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Clearly, deciding on a date through one trait alone can be quite the gamble. If a finch is to carry on with its own kind, there’s a good chance it’s imprinting on other cues to tell who’s who in the avian community, reasoned evolutionary biologists <a href="https://eeb.princeton.edu/people/peter-grant">Peter</a> and <a href="https://eeb.princeton.edu/people/b-rosemary-grant">Rosemary</a> Grant of Princeton University. And if the Grants have a theory about Darwin’s finches, it’s probably right.</p><p>The pair has studied the Galápagos Islands’ winged residents <a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/01/6/l_016_01.html">since 1973</a>, observing evolution in real time as lineages of finches ebbed and flowed through the years. From 1976 to 2012, the Grants tracked thousands of finches on the tiny volcanic outcrop of Daphne Major, meticulously recording their beak and body dimensions and noting each bird’s parentage and mating habits (according to their report, the duo attempted to find every nest and identify the parents in every year of breeding from 1976 to 1998).</p>
<div class="related"></div>
<p>“There is so much power in long-term studies like these,” says <a href="http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/expertise/profile.cfm?stref=136040">James Dale</a>, an evolutionary biologist who studies bird behavior at Massey University in New Zealand. The Grants, he adds, have “accumulated a vast database that allows them to test so many new theories.”</p><p>The breadth of the Grants’ body of work is truly staggering. By 2012, the pair had amassed nearly 40 years of anatomical and behavioral data on two species of finch: the <a href="https://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/Species-Account/nb/species/megfin1/overview">medium ground finch</a> (<i>Geospiza fortis</i>), a puff of a bird with a stubby beak suited for snacking on seeds; and the <a href="https://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/Species-Account/nb/species/cocfin3">cactus finch</a> (<i>Geospiza scandens</i>), which sports a svelte, spiky beak apt for chowing down on—you guessed it—prickly pear cactus.</p><p>The Grants quickly discovered each species of finch had a strong tendency to stick to its own kind—and, as they expected, the cues for their choices weren’t limited to song. For instance, in the medium ground finch, body size matched up consistently between mates and parents—especially the father. In the cactus finch, on the other hand, females also went for daddy doppelgängers, but instead prioritized the shape of their fathers’ beaks. Regardless of anatomy, these preferences meant that when most flirty finches were hot to trot, they were recalling the faces and forms they saw most often in their youth.</p><p>“It was very rewarding to discover that [features] of the mates of both sons and daughters can be predicted from the same characteristics of the parents,” the Grants wrote in an email.</p><p>Incredibly, because the differences between individual birds are so minor, many finches were selecting mates among anatomical variants of “just millimeters,” says <a href="http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~jweir/">Jason Weir</a>, a biologist who studies the evolution of birds at the University of Toronto, but was not involved in the work. Such a subtle pattern, he says, was only detectable through the sheer numbers of birds the Grants tagged and tracked over the years. “They basically know every individual and have every pedigree,” Weir explains.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Geospiza_scandens_male.width-990_jA5dMpy.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>A male cactus finch. His pointed beak may appeal to a female looking to couple up—if it resembles her father's, that is. Credit: David Cook, flickr</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Every population, however, is graced by a few renegade romantics. Some medium ground finches ultimately strayed outside their own lineage, blurring the lines between species. But even mismatched lovebirds found common ground. Rather than sticking to their own, some medium ground finches sought the company of <a href="https://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/Species-Account/nb/species/smgfin1"><i>small</i> ground finches</a> (<i>Geospiza fuliginosa</i>), which are closely related, but, as their name indicates, a bit more diminutive in size. When the Grants examined these oddballs, they realized the medium ground finches most likely to seek mini-mates were often pint-sized themselves.</p><p>Some large finches took on a similar habit. Over the course of his 14-year life, one lothario from the <a href="https://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/Species-Account/nb/species/larcaf2/overview">large cactus finch</a> (<i>Geospiza conirostris</i>) population swept no less than six female medium ground finches off their feet—several of whom were particularly big-bodied for their breed. Even in extra-species couplings, like mated with like.</p><p>Imprinting on parents to find a mate “is a learning process that helps finches to navigate the adult world,” the Grants explain.</p>
<div class="newsletter"></div>
<p>And the findings of this study speak to much more than individual finches’ flights of fancy. By picking partners that parallel their parents, finches increase the likelihood that their mates—and future offspring—will be of their same ilk. Reusing the same imprinting template over and over means that the differences between lineages can get enhanced until they split away entirely. With this mirroring strategy, finches can breed diversity under even the most unexpected of circumstances.</p><p>Turns out, birds of a feather really do flock together—especially in the Galapagos.</p>

<p>Bringing home fellas that look just like dad might be a red flag to some. But for Galápagos finches, a pairing like this might just do papa proud.</p>

Humpbacks and many other whales use baleen—the overlapping structures in their mouths where teeth might otherwise be—to filter tiny prey like krill and plankton out of water. But because baleen has the texture of hair or fingernails, it doesn't preserve well in the fossil record. New research now indicates that some whales may have fed by suction in the evolutionary interim between teeth and baleen. Photo Credit: Ari S. Friedlaender/University of California, Santa Cruz under NOAA permit

This 33-Million-Year-Old Whale Sucked Up Food Like A Giant Vacuum

<p>It takes a lot to feed a <a href="http://www.pbs.org/big-blue-live/animals/blue-whale/">blue whale</a>. One of these super-sized swimmers can consume as much as 8,000 pounds of food—about the weight of a Hummer H2—on a daily basis. Which means blue whales need to be exquisitely equipped for some serious eating.</p><p>The secret to this behemoth’s success? Baleen: a hyper-efficient filter-feeding system found exclusively in whales, composed of a comb-like series of overlapping plates with the texture of fingernails. After taking a massive gulp of ocean water, <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/ocean-giants-whale-fact-sheet/7567/">baleen whales</a>—including blue whales and <a href="https://www.pbs.org/video/life-reef-humpback-whales/">humpbacks</a>—expel unwanted liquid through this sieve, leaving behind a nutrient-dense mouthful of tiny, freshly-strained prey like krill and plankton that are easily swallowed whole.</p><p>But scientists continue to grapple with the evolutionary origins of nature’s biggest oral colander. Baleen whales’ ancestors had teeth—and many of the details behind the transition to baleen, which preserves poorly in the fossil record, remain mysterious.</p><p>Now, with the re-examination of a 33-million-year-old fossil, researchers are filling in a piece of this long-standing puzzle. According to <a href="https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(18)31414-3">a new study</a> published today in the journal <i>Current Biology</i>, some whales jettisoned their teeth entirely before the acquisition of baleen, and in the interim, adopted a third method of feeding: suctioning up their food like giant vacuum cleaners.</p>
<div class="ad"></div>
<p>“If this is right, this fossil fills in a missing spot on the [whale family] tree,” says <a href="https://www.uprovidence.edu/bio/jessica-martin/">Jessica Martin</a>, a paleontologist at the University of Providence who was not involved in the research. “This might change the way we look at the big picture of this transition.”</p><p>The fossil in question, newly anointed <i>Maiabalaena nesbittae</i>, was first unearthed in Oregon in the 1970s, but spent decades in the collections of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History still shrouded in rock. “This fossil’s been languishing for years,” says study author <a href="https://paleobiology.si.edu/staff/individuals/pyenson.html">Nicholas Pyenson</a>, the Museum’s curator of fossil marine mammals. “It’s amazing to finally be able to weigh in on it.”</p><p>At about 33 million years old, <i>M. nesbittae</i> likely swam the seas of the early Oligocene—a period of rapid and vast geologic change. It was around this time that the southern tip of what’s now South America broke free of Antarctica, rejiggering ocean currents and cooling marine temperatures worldwide. Though it’s still unclear exactly how this transition affected ocean biodiversity, if there was a paleontological moment for a lineage of whales to ditch its dentition, it very well could have been this.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Carlos_Peredo_-_NMNH-2018-03422.width-990_nTMPSDA.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>The upper jaw and skull of <i>Maiabalaena nesbittae</i>, an extinct whale species that lived 33 million years ago. <i>M. nesbittae </i>was toothless, and may have been a suction feeder that gave rise to modern baleen whales. Photo Credit: Smithsonian Institution</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Which makes <i>M. nesbittae</i> a potential watershed whale. Only one precious specimen of the species has been uncovered to date, and the fossil is incomplete. Luckily, most of what’s left involves the skull—which is key to studying how this species managed its massive, yet often microscopic, meals. To interrogate this fossil’s feeding forte, a team of scientists led by Carlos Peredo, a palaeobiologist at George Mason University, decided to reopen the 40-year-old case on <i>M. nesbittae.</i></p><p>One thing was quickly obvious to Peredo. “I looked for teeth, and it had no teeth,” he explains with a laugh. “That was the easy one.” Teeth, unlike baleen, are hardened and encased in enamel, and thus far more likely to preserve as fossils. Even if its chompers had somehow been lost to time, the roof of <i>M. nesbittae’s</i> mouth also appeared to be structurally inhospitable to sockets that might otherwise house true dentition. This made it unlikely that this whale was munching on large-bodied prey, à la its toothier ancestors.</p>
<div class="related"></div>
<p>Next, the team used CT scanning to more closely analyze the skull’s internal architecture without compromising the fossil. As there was little point in searching for ephemeral baleen, Peredo and his colleagues instead searched for attachment sites from which the baleen might have been suspended like vertical window blinds. They discovered the upper jaw was thin and narrow, without enough surface area to accommodate the gums from which baleen plates might grow. To the researchers, this was a clear strike against filter feeding.</p><p>The researchers believe <i>M. nesbittae</i> utilized another option entirely on the road to baleen: simply slurping prey out of the surrounding waters through the sheer force of suction. Although the fossil’s facial muscles were long gone, the bones of its throat indicated that the whale was capable of retracting its tongue, creating negative pressure that would have drawn in water and small creatures from the surrounding environment. The toothless whale would have had no means to chew its prey, simply swallowing them whole. But the switch to suction was likely a move that would have averted a significant cost: Teeth are energetically expensive to produce. And it was on this blank canvas, the authors propose, that baleen eventually took shape a few million years later.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Carlos_Peredo_-_Maiabalaena_Final_Cover.width-990_qCIUmOD.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>An artist's imagining of a <i>Maiabalaena nesbittae</i> calf nursing from its mother. Artist Credit: Alex Boersma</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>As modern humans can attest, teeth come in handy. They allow creatures to both latch onto their prey and grind them down to swallowable portions, significantly increasing the size and breadth of an animal’s viable menu items. Suction feeding, on the other hand, doesn’t pulverize prey before it goes down the gullet, and favors smaller, softer-bodied meals. But suction feeding’s lack of oral ornamentation means it’s a relatively cheap strategy. Even toothy mammals like humans are no stranger to its efficiency: Suckling is the only way babies can eat before their teeth come in.</p><p>Some scientists, however, are a little more hesitant to embrace the idea that <i>M. nesbittae</i> was a suction feeder. “I’m not convinced it didn’t have teeth,” says <a href="https://www.rachelracicot.org/">Rachel Racicot</a>, a paleobiologist who studies marine mammals at the Keck Science Center. Critical pieces of the fossil’s jaw are fairly worn or incomplete, she points out, muddying the conclusions that can be drawn about the presence or absence of dentition. Until more fossils from this time period reveal themselves, suction feeding will be difficult to confirm, Racicot adds. Alternatively, evidence of <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2017.00067/full">a more stepwise transition</a> from teeth to baleen may exist—which could mean there were once intermediate whale species that harbored both in their mouths. The two theories on this interim aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive.</p>
<div class="newsletter"></div>
<p>Regardless of how these whales fed in the years after they lost their teeth, the ultimate advent of baleen was revolutionary. According to Peredo, “it’s like growing fingernails out of the roof of your mouth.” There’s nothing else quite like baleen in the animal kingdom, and we probably wouldn’t have the sea’s biggest creatures without it. By dispensing of the sea water “filler” in each gulp, filter-feeding ensures that baleen whales can engulf gargantuan amounts of food in one go: A blue whale can take up <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/12/09/blue-whales-can-eat-half-a-million-calories-in-a-single-mouthful/">half a million calories</a> in a single mouthful.</p><p>“If you drink coffee, you’re taking advantage of filter feeding,” Pyenson explains. “It’s just separating fluid out from a substance.” Though in the case of whales, he adds, they’re hungry for the grinds, not the liquid coffee, so to speak. A good filter means that especially tiny forms of prey—which don’t require chewing—can comprise a viable meal.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/asf_bestof035.width-990_reOS7BP.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>Modern baleen whales, like humpbacks, employ a filter-feeding strategy that enormously ups the nutritional value of each mouthful compared to suction feeding. This has enabled many whale species to grow to gargantuan sizes. Photo Credit: Ari S. Friedlaender/University of California, Santa Cruz under NOAA permit</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Chomping and suction feeding still have their perks, though. All three feeding strategies exist in modern whales, helping many species comfortably share the seas. And adopting one tactic doesn’t preclude a whale from utilizing another. While some toothed whales do chew on their prey, many like orcas or beluga whales simply use their teeth as graspers before swallowing food whole. Others like the beaked whale or narwhal have only rudimentary tooth structures, and must rely on suction to more or less inhale their prey. Though gray whales are equipped with baleen, they happily suction feed as well.</p><p>This sort of flexibility may become increasingly important as the planet continues to change under the influence of human intervention. “<i>Maiabalaena</i> is like its own little case study,” Peredo says. “The oceans changed dramatically, and this is what happened—whales changed what they ate, the physical structures of their mouths.”</p><p>But whales aren’t infinitely adaptable; even baleen took millions of years to come into being. It remains unclear how sea life will fare in an age of <a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/climate-change-plants-high-temperature/">rising temperatures</a> and increasingly pervasive <a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/ships-noises-humpback-whale-song/">acoustic pollution</a>. For now, researchers are keeping an eye on the past. The search for baleen’s origins may yet reveal the climactic changes that triggered its rise—and how whales weathered the storm with their mysterious shuttered smiles.</p>

<p>After discarding their teeth, the ancestors of today’s filter-feeding whales may have fed by suction before evolving baleen.</p>

The size and shape of rodent sperm varies drastically across the many species that inhabit South American forests. Photo Credit: Júlio Vilela, The Field Museum of Natural History

What Rodent Sperm Can Teach Us About Biodiversity

<p>In the summer of 2008, waylaid on a trip to Buenos Aires, <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Noe_De_La_Sancha">Noé de la Sancha</a> found himself face-to-face for the first time with his future in-laws, struggling to explain the hundreds of pickled testicles slung over his shoulder.</p><p>But de la Sancha, a biologist at the Field Museum of Natural History and Chicago State University, had good reason for toting around such precious cargo: The package was for a friend (really, it was). Awaiting him at the end of his journey was a team of researchers at the University of Buenos Aires, ready to extract hordes of formalin-preserved sperm of all shapes and sizes from the rodent reproductive tracts that de la Sancha had collected during his field studies.</p><p>The team’s work, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy146">published today</a> in the <i>Journal of Mammalogy</i>, showcases the surprising extent of diversity in South American rodents. In some cases, the physical characteristics of sperm might even help researchers distinguish between the many closely-related species that share this rich landscape.</p>
<div class="ad"></div>
<p>From the meek house mouse to the bizarrely behemoth capybara, the breadth of rodents in our modern world is vast: About <a href="http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/rodentia/rodentia.html">1,500 species</a> scurry the globe. Some, like chipmunks or voles, are capable of carrying deadly diseases that can be passed to people; others, like <a href="https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/4651/22191157">the uber-fluffy chinchilla</a>, have been driven to the brink of extinction by human hunters. Despite this diversity, it’s sometimes impossible to tell these cuddly critters apart by looks alone—especially when related species scamper around in close proximity. So de la Sancha and his colleagues, led by biologist <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/58645939_Luis_F_Rossi">Luis Rossi</a> of the University of Buenos Aires, decided to go microscopic.</p><p>“Sperm are some of the most biologically diverse cell types in nature,” explains <a href="http://biology.umd.edu/heidi-fisher.html">Heidi Fisher</a>, who studies the sexual evolution of rodents at the University of Maryland, College Park but did not contribute to the new research. Eyeballing sperm might just help researchers pick apart subtle differences between species.</p><p>To test this possibility, de la Sancha, Rossi, and their colleagues sampled the sperm of 58 individual rodents spanning 18 different species native to South America. All the specimens had been chemically preserved during de la Sancha’s travels, enabling the researchers to extract the contents of the rodents’ epididymides—the long, highly convoluted tubes that cradle the testes.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/IMG-6259.width-990_TJ5g6TP.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>These taxidermied rodents showcase several of the species that romp the forests of South America. While many of these rodents are only distantly related, they look very similar, making species distinctions tough in the field. Photo Credit: Field Museum of Natural History</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>When the researchers peered at their pickled prizes under the microscope, they were surprised to find just how much sperm differed in physique. Sperm are sculpted a bit like balloons: Each has a head, a slight neck, a midpiece, and a tail. The head contains the sperm’s genetic payload—what will ultimately combine with the DNA of the female egg—while the midpiece is chock full of energy-generating machinery to power the whiplike movements of the sperm’s tail. But beyond these general motifs, the similarities end.</p><p>Two of the species surveyed—<a href="https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/3613/115065791"><i>Calomys laucha</i></a>, or the small vesper mouse, and <a href="https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/750/22333428"><i>Thaptomys nigrita</i></a>, or the blackish grass mouse—appeared to produce sperm with oval heads, not unlike the ones found on human variants. The other 16 species, however, harbored sperm with “hooked” heads, whose tops resembled the curved peaks of meringues; of these, some were rounded at the junction with the neck, while others were more square-jawed. Additionally, some species’ sperm swam with highly elongated midpieces and tails, while others were substantially more compact.</p>
<div class="related"></div>
<p>Unexpectedly, more closely related species did not tend to have more similar looking sperm. Divergences in sperm size and shape could help researchers quickly and efficiently sort rodents in the future, de la Sancha says—especially in cases where rodent populations look alike and occupy overlapping habitats. Many researchers rely on DNA sequencing, which has gotten faster and cheaper in recent years, to sort species, but genetic information hasn’t been banked for all rodents. Even when the sequence of a genome is known, the boundaries between populations often blur. In these cases, starkly divergent sperm could offer some identifying clues.</p><p>“There isn’t one magic bullet for distinguishing species,” de la Sancha says. “To describe a new species, you have to use as many types of evidence as you can.”</p><p>In fact, there’s precedent for the utility of scrutinizing rodent sperm for exactly this purpose, says <a href="https://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/bill.breed">William Breed</a>, a reproductive biologist at the University of Adelaide who has dedicated his career to the study of sperm in Australia’s rodents and marsupials. Breed’s previous work has identified at least <a href="https://drmc.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/handle/2440/5329">two</a> <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230191076_Spermatozoa_of_murid_rodents_from_Africa_morphological_diversity_and_evolutionary_trends">cases</a> in which very different forms of sperm appear in males supposedly of the same mouse or rat species, hinting at the possibility that some subpopulations have begun to drift apart genetically.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Figure_2.width-990_7UB2iR6.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>The heads of sperm of vesper mice in the <i>Calomys </i>genus come in different shapes. The tops of some are hooked, while others are oval; at the base, some are polygonal, while others are entirely round. Credit: Rossi <i>et al. </i>2018</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>But the system is far from perfect. For one thing, sperm are finicky, and there can be quite a bit of variation in how they develop. Within a single species—or even a single <i>individual—</i>not all sperm are identical. Sperm are churned out <i>en masse</i> throughout a male’s lifetime, and suffer high rates of DNA mutation. These sensitive swimmers are also prone to shapeshifting in response to changing environments, which can introduce stress or toxins, Fisher explains. Little tweaks in sperm anatomy can even occur over time as an individual ages, or when he comes into heat during the mating season, Breed adds.</p><p>With such caveats in mind, Breed says, researchers leading future studies will need to be conscious of changing conditions to get an accurate picture of these eccentric ejaculates. What’s more, several of the species surveyed in the current study were represented by only one individual—and though the researchers collected at least 50 sperm from each species, the build of one rodent’s sperm isn’t necessarily representative of his brethren.</p>
<div class="newsletter"></div>
<p>Regardless of its utility for species identification, this study highlights the incredible range of sperm shapes and sizes—even within a single group of rodents, says <a href="https://hoekstra.oeb.harvard.edu/">Hopi Hoekstra</a>, an evolutionary biologist at Harvard University who did not participate in the research. And in the future, this kind of diversity could speak volumes about these and other understudied species.</p><p>Sperm <a href="http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.531.1032&amp;rep=rep1&amp;type=pdf">vary immensely</a> <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123725684000033">across the tree of life</a>. Fruit flies, for instance, can produce sperm cells that run <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/05/25/fruit-fly-sperm-is-monstrously-long-and-we-might-finally-know-why/?utm_term=.4e307bb8d9b2">about 20 times the length</a> of their own bodies. But rodents in particular—which, by species count, make up about 40 percent of mammals—seem to <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1992.tb01193.x">really run the gamut</a> of this manly morphology.</p><p>And the heterogeneity isn’t just for kicks. Sperm architecture, for instance, might be intricately linked to sexual behavior. Sperm with <a href="https://hoekstra.oeb.harvard.edu/files/hoekstra/files/fisheretal2016.pdf">longer midpieces</a>, which supply the power necessary to weather the labyrinthine journey to the egg, tend to swim faster, and are often found in rodent species with more promiscuous males.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/DSC06686-JFV191_Akodon_montensis_photo_by__Jul.width-990_XIxpsEl.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>This montane grass mouse (<i>Akodon montensis</i>) has sperm with a pyriform head shape: The tops look like the tips of meringues, and the base is rounded.</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Hooked heads—which are <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01867.x">especially common</a> in rodents—have also been the source of much study, though the impetus behind their clawed appearance remains mostly mysterious. Some scientists theorize that hooks could come in handy as sperm snake eggward, acting as anchors that allows these stalwart swimmers to <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01867.x">lash themselves</a> to the sides of the <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jeb.12857">female reproductive tract</a>. Especially long and curvy hooks might also help sperm <a href="https://watermark.silverchair.com/biolreprod0025.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAmEwggJdBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggJOMIICSgIBADCCAkMGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMVuX8B5rk1RbpZfG8AgEQgIICFOocqyjcAA1S-Ui5GZfqK4mAUMiZF9_nHeTTuMXi6E8BvaMDtdd9KLrRc0Bsw2fAPdZ-7g4e8Y88frZX6WbvB8JZddQ3nQbWIXVhjav_9-U8c91Fl_RFRuYlpP3AN0DpjUNKZ4-Uyayy1CDXS2-_pmV7RBqm7-_wDFLN3vstVrPJBuR2YQa9nZFGHaUnboW0gH2K9YhKifbU0SojbFo7gnjSLWu_idYyCR8gs2VnnkgrHhnYwWcNLOZTrvOylHTVhxUoUu9o1_WGh1O1-1M_j4WkogR0Qq64nDxTTy7hEmIT16eCYgm7iAprCmXHTElSUWQZYYhwSRdqVIC5RMxSixNxsjDh7JeZrNd2Bc102cKuQueStFk0X-GUXLTJEZJchqI3Yt3CpHBFlxNzY_AnWPM7V-ZY8YlXiviF2f5xqQOw1_DXAPQGu2COh7BZ1uzyQ0GoBv9ahBa_P0xU1B07kWEYwD2oQZunIvIvVMW0Rpfupbm1XeV4cV0v6uaa9xsFBwlSaFmRvA47E_-BsYRrYCOXgGWEbRU8MH4SOSIAGkqctF65bcLCO8DrV_td0PaWAVY8ipeR9Frkc6D6Za7_UQQ7vDYa3xZw1lbzcHNdZC39BaRzQt2J-Opl1eNR5tBpw57dPMi9gQoADizbs1bTV6QhVVPlyCGKteMa4yZ9CKNQVs12McXGsmtzuOD4ZvmT_rq8jW8">speed along</a> by cutting through the current of the vaginal milieu like the bow of a boat.</p><p>Currently, too little is known about the South American rodents in question to determine which of these theories will pan out. But de la Sancha hopes studies like his will renew interest in conservation, especially in an era of such rapid species loss and habitat destruction. The clock is ticking—and every new bit of information counts.</p><p>“If these species go extinct before we can understand them,” Fisher says, “we won’t know what we’re losing. There’s inherent value in looking at diversity.”</p>

<p>When it comes to understanding the diversity of South American rodents, sperm might have a lot to say—if you’re willing to listen.</p>

A month of space flight can take its toll on the antibody-producing cells of mice. The trip back to Earth may not be enough to repair the damage. Photo Credit: National Cancer Institute, Wikimedia Commons

These Mice Weathered Space. Here’s What Happened to Their Immune Systems.

<p>Humans weren’t built for space.</p><p>The vast emptiness beyond Earth’s cozy atmosphere is an unforgiving place: Without the pull of gravity, the body can literally begin to unravel. Bones lose mass. Muscles deteriorate. Organs and blood vessels slosh and swell. And the immune system is particularly <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038331/">sensitive</a> to environmental flux; astronauts experience <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098747/">an uptick in infections</a> while aboard the International Space Station.</p><p>Now, scientists report that even a brief sojourn into space can discombobulate immune factors necessary to fight off disease—and the effects may persist or worsen after the return to Earth. According to <a href="https://www.fasebj.org/doi/10.1096/fj.201801463R">a study</a> published today in <i>The FASEB Journal,</i> mice ferried through space by the <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/ames/research/space-biosciences/bion-m1">Bion-M1 biosatellite</a> suffered a prolonged drop in the production of B cells, the white blood cells responsible for antibody production. If the results hold true in humans, the new research might explain some of the biggest and most lasting pitfalls of our weightless wanderings in space.</p><p>“This study is very valuable, and an important piece in this puzzle,” says <a href="https://www.topicalteam-stressinspace.eu/index.php/chouk%C3%A8r.html">Alexander Choukér</a>, who studies space medicine at the University of Munich in Germany but did not participate in the study.</p>
<div class="ad"></div>
<p>So far, only a few studies have investigated the effects of <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-microgravity-58.html">microgravity</a> on animal bodies. Jettisoning organisms into space is no trivial feat—and the handful of humans who have made the trip are few in number, leaving many of the most pressing questions in extraterrestrial travel unanswered.</p><p>In an attempt to fill in some of these gaps, NASA and the Russian Institute of Biomedical Problems launched the <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/2013/13-34AR-bion-space-biology-mission.html">Bion-M1 biosatellite</a>—a veritable spacefaring <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/ames/research/space-biosciences/bion-m1/">menagerie</a> teeming with mice, geckos, gerbils, fish, snails, and microbes––in 2013. The story quickly turned grim: During the month-long orbit, a series of equipment failures prompted the demise of all the spacecraft’s gerbils and fish, along with about two-thirds of the mice on board. When the spacecraft touched back down on Earth, the researchers found that only the geckos, snails, and 16 disgruntled mice had survived the trip.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Launch_of_BION-M1_on_Sojuz.width-990_XIhC6TZ.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>The Bion-M1 biosatellite, contained within the Sojuz in this photo, launched in April 2013, was a veritable Noah's ark of space exploration, with gerbils, mice, fish, snails, geckos, and more aboard its capsule. Due to equipment failures, many of its passengers perished during the journey. Photo Credit: DLR photo, Wikimedia Commons</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Undeterred, scientists around the world divvied up the remaining animals for further study. Several mice came into the hands of a team led by <a href="https://www.biochem2.com/index.php/22-ibcii/pqc/130-frontpage-pqc#georgtascher">Georg Tascher</a>, an analytical chemist at the University of Frankfurt in Germany, and <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fabrice_Bertile">Fabrice Bertile</a>, a biologist at the Hubert Curien Multi-disciplinary Institute in France.</p><p>Curious to see how mouse immunity had fared on the final frontier, the researchers split the newly-arrived mice into two groups. The scientists analyzed the first group of mice within a day of landing on Earth, and the second after the mice had spent a week recovering—which translates to approximately a couple months for a human. (A third control group of mice was housed on Earth.) Tascher, Bertile, and their colleagues then extracted the rodents’ spleens and leg bones—including the bone marrow, where white blood cells are manufactured—and inspected their contents.</p><p>As Tascher recalls, due to the precious nature of the samples, it was a high-stakes job. “I was sweating a lot during sample preparation,” he explains. “If something goes wrong, you can’t just send the mice into space again.”</p>
<div class="related"></div>
<p>The researchers discovered that, compared to the earthbound rodents, the mice profiled immediately after orbit experienced a small dip in several immune-related proteins.</p><p>But the worst was yet to come. Even after a week under normal gravity conditions, many known protective pathways were still on the fritz, and the levels of some proteins had actually decreased <i>further.</i> Upon touchdown, the number of B cells in the spleens and bone marrow of wayfaring mice was mostly on par with rodents who hadn’t left Earth. Just a few days later, however, about half the cells had disappeared. The month abroad, it seems, had taken a serious toll on these antibody factories—even after re-acclimating to Earth.</p><p>“You always think, what happens to a person when they go to space? It’s a big change: There’s no gravity, and cells are working differently,” Choukér says. “But the return is a big change, too.”</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/NASAs_Marshall_Space_Flight_Center_flickr.width-990_Gm2SyVl.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>A view of Earth’s horizon from the International Space Station (ISS). Many unknown variables remain in the science of space flight—but it's already clear that microgravity and radiation from the sun negatively impact health. Photo Credit: NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, flickr</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>This seems in keeping with some preliminary results from NASA’s ongoing <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/2099.html">Twins Study</a>, which is profiling the differences between identical twins Mark and Scott Kelly, the latter of whom recently spent a year living on the International Space Station. Researchers on this project have already found that while some parts of Scott’s immune system <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/2099.html">remained intact</a> in space, several genes important for fighting off disease were <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/2099.html">expressed differently</a> during and <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-twins-study-confirms-preliminary-findings">after</a> space flight.</p><p>Even in mouse terms, however, a week isn’t <i>that</i> long. Given more time off duty, it’s possible the mice used in the study may have more or less returned to baseline. Previous studies have hinted at the <a href="https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030101.pdf">resilience</a> of human astronauts, explains <a href="https://surgery.ucsf.edu/faculty/general-surgery/tammy-t-chang,-md,-phd.aspx">Tammy Chang</a>, a biologist and physician at the University of California, San Francisco, who was not involved in the current study. Similarly, Scott Kelly’s initial follow-up was at only six months post landing, leaving plenty of room for further developments down the line.</p><p>As things stand, most of the long-term effects of these journeys remain mysterious. Future experiments are needed to address these effects, as well as the question of how even longer odysseys in space might rejigger the road to recovery.</p>
<div class="newsletter"></div>
<p>And proceeding with caution is essential. It’s still not clear what aspect of space flight is actually causing the immune systems of these mice to go haywire. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3501893/">Microgravity</a> is sure to weigh heavy on the mind, but space travel is rife with hardship. Another problem is the high intensity of radiation from the sun, which, in space, is no longer filtered through Earth’s protective atmosphere. To make matters worse, there’s evidence that some infectious microbes don’t just survive the altered conditions of space. They <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/10/25/bacteria-get-dangerously-weird-in-space/?utm_term=.73d2b2746882">thrive</a> in it.</p><p>“There’s still a long way to go to really understand the biology of space flight,” says <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rasha_Hammamieh">Rasha Hammamieh</a>, director of the Integrative Systems Biology Program at the U.S. Army Center for Environmental Health Research. “This is just the tip of the iceberg.”</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Sojuz_2.1A_with_BION-M1_on_its_way_to_the_laun.width-990_hLhS8cJ.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>Sojuz 2.1A, which carried Bion-M1 as well as some small satellites, on its way to the launch pad, in April 2013. A Bion-M2 is already in the works, which will build on Bion-M1's findings and correct the unexpected issues that occurred during the initial trip. Photo Credit: DLR photo, Wikimedia Commons</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Of course, mice aren’t humans. Any work done with these pint-sized cosmonauts needs to be taken with a grain of salt. But the perils of space make for a <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-launches-mice-to-space-station-for-twin-study-2018-6">pretty great equalizer</a>: <a href="https://www.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/japplphysiol.01052.2002">Across</a> <a href="https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030101.pdf">species</a>, space has a way of compromising the immune response, Hammamieh explains.</p><p>Scientists are already brainstorming ways to minimize the drawbacks of future expeditions. Interventions to bolster astronaut immunity could take the form of anything from gut microbiome probiotics to anti-inflammatory drugs. And plans for a Bion-M2 mission, set to launch within the next couple years, are already underway, study author Bertile explains. Some of the aforementioned countermeasures may even be put to the test on the new satellite.</p><p>Riding on the heels of unfortunate mishaps from the first endeavor, scientists are eager for a second shot at success. When the new Bion-M2 re-enters Planet Earth’s stratosphere, it will hopefully carry a capsule full of cargo that’s still alive and kicking—and full of stories to tell about the rigors of space travel.</p>

<p>A month of space flight might compromise the ability of mice to make disease-fighting antibodies—even after their return to Earth.</p>

Exposing a developing embryo to Prozac could affects its hormones and behavior later in life—and these effects may even pass on to future generations. Photo Credit: Vasyl Dolmatov, iStock

Parents Might Pass the Effects of Prozac on to Future Generations

<p>There are few relationships more biologically intimate than the one between a mammalian mother-to-be and her growing fetus. But the dialogue of <a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/lifes-greatest-miracle/">pregnancy</a> can be a double-edged sword.</p><p>All sorts of chemicals easily traverse the placental barrier, and antidepressants are no exception. While the use of drugs like Prozac during pregnancy has been linked to <a href="https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bcp.13321">cardiac defects</a> and <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/pr201577">behavioral changes</a> in children, none of the research done in humans can ethically test for cause and effect. But with <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db283.htm">more than 16 percent</a> of American women currently taking antidepressants, the need to fully suss out the long-term repercussions of these early chemical exposures is ever-growing.</p><p>Now, researchers have unveiled an unexpected ally in their search for understanding: a striped, diminutive minnow called a zebrafish. According to <a href="https://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1811695115">a new study</a> published today in the journal <i>PNAS,</i> developing zebrafish embryos exposed to the active ingredient of Prozac are less equipped to cope with stress later in life—and these effects are passed on through future generations. While the results have yet to be repeated in human populations, they may prompt a shift in our outlook on the prescription of antidepressants during this vulnerable period.</p>
<div class="ad"></div>
<p>In spite of their stripes, zebrafish are far more fish than zebra. But we have more in common with these mighty minnows than you might think: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3703927/">About 70 percent</a> of human genes have an obvious zebrafish counterpart. Like us, zebrafish respond negatively to stressful events and release many of the same hormones—some of which are even more comparable to those in humans than those produced by <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336318/">rodents</a>.</p><p>“The overwhelming evidence today supports the value of zebrafish for modeling complex disorders, including schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety,” explains <a href="http://pharmacy.swu.edu.cn/viscms/pharidex/bumen21044/20130729/392494.html">Allan Kalueff</a>, a neuropharmacologist who studies zebrafish at Southwest University in China, but did not participate in the new research. “There is a striking similarity when it comes to drug responses.”</p><p>To mimic the medicinal milieu of the human fetal environment, study author <a href="https://teamendo.ca/?page_id=283">Marilyn Vera-Chang</a>, a biologist at the University of Ottawa in Canada, first exposed broods of newly-fertilized zebrafish eggs to fluoxetine, an antidepressant commonly marketed under the brand name Prozac. She then waited patiently as the eggs hatched into juveniles and matured into adults—a six-month process—and measured their chemical and behavioral responses to stress.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Despoina_Chrysostomou_Wikimedia.width-990_ke6nPvb.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>Zebrafish embryos are transparent, making it easy to observe their development. Mothers can lay up to 200 eggs a week. Photo Credit: Despoina Chrysostomou, Wikimedia Commons</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Measuring stress in zebrafish <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036931">isn’t trivial</a>: These little fish aren’t particularly chatty about their feelings. Without saying a word, however, zebrafish can still speak volumes—chemically, that is. Just like humans, zebrafish produce the stress hormone cortisol in response to taxing situations. Cortisol is a body’s way of signaling that something’s amiss, so resources can be diverted to weather the storm. Like many other chemicals, cortisol operates on a Goldilocks principle. Too much cortisol puts the body on constant high alert—a state that’s been <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451064/">linked to depression</a>. Too little, however, leaves an animal ill equipped to process stress, and can even lead to <a href="https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/addisons-disease/symptoms-causes/syc-20350293">diseases</a> characterized by extreme fatigue.</p><p>When Vera-Chang measured the zebrafish’s cortisol levels after they’d had a brief, nerve-wracking experience—being suspended out of water—she found that fish exposed to fluoxetine as eggs produced less cortisol compared to their untreated counterparts. Even when left to mind their own business, treated fish had less of the hormone coursing through their bodies.</p><p>It was a striking result. The adult zebrafish had spent the past five-plus months Prozac-free—and yet, the one-time exposure had blunted their stress response systems in a lasting way.</p>
<div class="related"></div>
<p>To see how this hormonal flux affected behavior, Vera-Chang next plopped individual zebrafish into a strange new environment—a fresh tank of water—to see how they’d react. Normally, in this situation, zebrafish spend a minute or two zipping around the bottom of their cage, searching for an exit. After the nerves have worn off a bit, they’ll tentatively begin to venture into the top half of the tank.</p><p>And that’s exactly what Vera-Chang saw—at least, in the fish that had spent their early development Prozac-free. Those who had been exposed to fluoxetine, on the other hand, remained stalwart bottom-dwellers. “It’s like they didn’t have energy to keep exploring,” Vera-Chang explains, “as if they were experiencing burnout.”</p><p>But the most surprising results were still to come. When the fluoxetine-treated fish had offspring of their own, they, too, produced less cortisol and were less eager to explore their tanks—despite never having seen the Prozac themselves. And, amazingly, when <i>these</i> zebrafish gave rise to another generation, the effect was still there. Somehow, the single exposure the first set of zebrafish had experienced during development was being passed down through the generations like an insidious inheritance.</p>
<div>
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-0IVgdPcygQ?feature=oembed" width="480"></iframe>
</div>
<p></p>
<div>
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/U5WxwcGYpZs?feature=oembed" width="480"></iframe>
</div>
<p>Eventually, three generations down the line, the behavioral effects faded. But even at this juncture, cortisol remained low. “This is like your grandparents influencing your behavior, and your great-grandparents influencing your hormone levels,” explains study author <a href="https://teamendo.ca/?page_id=2">Vance Trudeau</a>, a neuroendocrinologist at the University of Ottawa.</p><p>It’s still unclear what these differences mean, but the fact that the changes were inherited from generation to generation at all might spark concern. While more work is needed, the researchers theorize this may be the result of epigenetics—a phenomenon in which chemical markers are added to DNA, altering the expression of genes without affecting the underlying sequence. In recent years, <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dads-pass-more-genetics-their-sperm-180969760/">several</a> <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-dads-genes-can-prepare-mom-parenthood-180969793/">studies</a> have <a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/epigenetics-abuse/">indicated</a> that epigenetic modifications can be <a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/anxiety-may-be-passed-down-generation-to-generation/">passed</a> on to future generations, and this new study may be yet another example.</p><p>“We have to think about how we’re living our lives,” Vera-Chang says. “It’s not just us that are being affected by our actions.”</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Tom_Varco_Wikimedia.width-990_HpX5KvM.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>About 10 percent of Americans, and over 16 percent of American women, currently use antidepressants. Fluoxetine, or Prozac, is an especially common selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, or SSRI. Photo Credit: Tom Varco, Wikimedia Commons</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>However, researchers are quick to caution that it’s too early to jump to conclusions about human populations. Working with zebrafish makes it possible to conduct in-depth experiments that can’t be done in people—but analogs between the two species have their limits.</p><p>For one thing, humans who take antidepressants do so for a reason: to treat mental illness. All the fish in this study were healthy, making it tough to evaluate how a drug might traverse the barriers between a depressed mother and her child, explains <a href="https://www.ru.nl/english/people/homberg-j/">Judith Homberg</a>, a behavioral neurogeneticist at Radboud University in the Netherlands who did not participate in the research.</p><p>“We can replicate anxiety and depression to an extent in animal models,” explains <a href="https://www.bcchr.ca/toberlander">Tim Oberlander</a>, a developmental pediatrician at BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute in Canada who did not participate in the new research. “But ultimately, the human experience needs to be recognized as a unique thing.”</p>
<div class="newsletter"></div>
<p>Additionally, incubating fish eggs in a petri dish is only a partial proxy for the placenta, says Homberg. Placental function itself could be affected by fluoxetine, meaning there could be other, indirect effects on a human fetus.</p><p>Still, a Prozac bath may not be terribly far off the mark. The uterine environment isn’t the only source of indirect exposure to antidepressants: Fluoxetine is one of many chemicals that have been found in water surrounding urban centers. “The bioecological impact of this study is very important,” Kalueff, the Southwest University neuropharmacologist, explains. “This tells us what could happen to children who drink fluoxetine-enriched water in big cities.”</p><p>Unfortunately, we’re still waiting on some of the most critical, human-centric data. Prozac first hit the market in the 1980s; as such, we’re only about one-and-a-half generations into use, Trudeau explains. As things stand, there’s some evidence that children of mothers taking fluoxetine during pregnancy are <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/pr201577">more withdrawn or anxious</a>, but there isn’t yet data on whether the effects persist into subsequent generations.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Nikita_Tsyba_and_Azamat_Bashabayev_Wikimedia.width-990_yzijtLe.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>A young zebrafish. While zebrafish don't physically resemble humans, the two species are very genetically similar, and both produce cortisol in response to stressful events. Photo Credit: Nikita Tsyba and Azamat Bashabayev, Wikimedia Commons</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>In the meantime, studies like these are essential for generating awareness, says <a href="https://www.mountsinai.org/profiles/veerle-bergink">Veerle Bergink</a>, a psychiatrist and obstetrician-gynecologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai who was not involved in the new find. “These findings show clearly that this is a topic that warrants further investigation in humans,” she adds. “We need to have these discussions. It’s a medical issue, but it’s also a societal issue.”</p><p>Ultimately, the researchers emphasize that results of this study aren’t prescriptive. While antidepressants may have their downsides, depression during pregnancy is also <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/070674370404901103">potentially</a> <a href="https://www.psyneuen-journal.com/article/S0306-4530(15)30006-8/fulltext">damaging</a> to a growing fetus. Women faced with this choice often find themselves saddled with a difficult decision—but every case is different. Concerned mothers-to-be should always engage in a careful risk and benefit evaluation with their physicians.</p><p>“There are many women who <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK361016/">really need this medication</a> to maintain mood stability,” Bergink advises. “For some women, it may be the best option to continue medication. However, there are also women for whom it may be a good option to see if they can taper, or seek alternate treatment, such as psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness based therapy, or group support, among others.”</p><p>Oberlander agrees: There’s not going to be a one-size-fits all solution. “Is the treatment better or worse than the condition itself?” he says. “That’s the core question that we need to figure out urgently.”</p>

<p>Treating zebrafish embryos with the active ingredient in Prozac can compromise the stress responses of generations to come.</p>

Female budgerigars, or parakeets, appear to value mates with mental dexterity—and will even switch their romantic allegiances from one male to another if the latter successfully shows off his smarts. Image Credit: webandi, Pixabay

In the World of Parrots, Nerdy Guys Get the Girls

<p>As humans, we all have our weaknesses—especially when it comes to matters of the heart. Some will search for a set of stunning, soul-piercing eyes; others will hold out for just the right kind of wise-cracking jokester. But in the world of birds, what avian attributes make hot-to-trot females’ hearts go aflutter?</p><p>As it turns out, fine-feathered females of the parrot persuasion might assess each male for size—the size of his intellect, that is. According to a <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.aau8181">new study</a> published today in the journal <i>Science,</i> male parakeets that show off their smarts become more attractive in the eyes of females, even if they’ve already been previously dismissed as less-than-ideal mates.</p><p>While previous research has hinted at this cognitive connection, this study is the first to directly point to the allure of acumen. “This is something that the field has been waiting for for a long time,” says <a href="http://www.angelamedinagarcia.com/">Angela Medina-García</a>, an expert in parakeet social behavior at the University of Colorado Boulder who was not involved in the study. “We know females prefer males who sing more elaborate songs, and that requires brains. But here, females actually prefer males who perform a mentally challenging task. That’s groundbreaking.”</p>
<div class="ad"></div>
<p>As any parakeet owner can attest, these colorful, pint-sized parrots are as keen as they are mischievous. But the bird cages in which they’re commonly found are far cries from the species’ natural Australian habitat. Native to dry regions that receive little rainfall, parakeets (or budgerigars, as they’re known in most of the world) must deal with frequent shifts in their environment. Unlike many other animals, these birds have only the loosest of breeding seasons; rampant rainfall, and the subsequent growth in vegetation, is what most predictably gets parakeets in the mood, explains <a href="https://christinedahlin.weebly.com/">Christine Dahlin</a>, a bird biologist who studies parrots at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, but was not involved in the study—making these birds akin to foul-weather friends (with benefits). Dahlin, who has bred budgies, recalls having to constantly mist the birds with water in an effort to rile up their libido.</p><p>The unpredictability of their lifestyle means that parakeets need to be both flexible and observant, Dahlin adds. And in Australia’s arid outback, where caches of seeds and insects can be few and far between, it pays to have your wits about you—or, at the very least, a reliable companion who does.</p><p>“You need to either discover the tricks of extracting food yourself, or be sensitive to other individuals who are,” says study author <a href="https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/carel-ten-cate">Carel ten Cate</a>, an animal behaviorist at Leiden University’s Institute of Biology in the Netherlands. So if anyone stands to benefit from a perceptive partner, it might just be these birds.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/bird-budgerigar-couple-208091.width-990_fop4NpH.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>Budgerigars sometimes pair up for extended periods of time in the wild, and are often physically affectionate with each other. Image Credit: Kadisha, Pixabay</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>To see if this theory panned out, a team of scientists led by Jiani Chen, a behavioral biologist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Zoology, engineered a series of heart-wrenching avian love triangles in a flock of young budgies. First, they introduced each female parakeet to two males and allowed her to make an arbitrary choice: The one she spent more time sidling up to was designated the “preferred” male; the male left in the dust, on the other hand, was labeled “less preferred.”</p><p>Some of these snubbed suitors were left to sulk. Others, however, were immediately recruited into an intensive brain-boosting boot camp in an attempt to elevate their partnering prospects. For one week, Chen diligently coached the males to open two complex contraptions filled with tasty treats. It was a laborious and time-consuming experiment, she recalls; some of the birds were more amenable to tutoring than others, and the task had been purposefully designed to be difficult. But regardless of each individual’s quirks, Chen saw the birds’ training through to the end.</p>
<div>
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="344" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/A6ivLSe5VTU?feature=oembed" width="459"></iframe>
</div>
<p></p>
<div>
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="344" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FLhpme8NjzE?feature=oembed" width="459"></iframe>
</div>
<p>Once the parakeets’ puzzle-solving skills were up to snuff, Chen reintroduced them to the same females who had passed them over before—only this time, their performance came with props.</p><p>As their ladies looked on, the once-rebuffed males handily pried open the containers, while their untrained counterparts (the females’ previous picks) remained flummoxed by the box. At the same time, the females were given their own food-filled contraptions, which had been taped shut, to give them a sense of the arduousness of the chore at hand. And because the puzzle boxes were translucent, the females had ample opportunity to ogle the delicious seeds within—and the preferred males’ stark ineptitude.</p><p>Then came the moment of truth. When Chen again asked each female to choose between the boys, the females overwhelmingly shifted their allegiances to the males they’d once scorned. Chen’s mental makeover had worked—and the now-skilled suitors’ displays of mental gymnastics had been enough to reverse the pecking order the females had established just days before.</p>
<div class="related"></div>
<p>It’s unclear what initially prompted the female parakeets to pick one male over the other, Chen says. Whatever it was, though, it had some staying power: If the females never witnessed the less-preferred paramour showing off his smarts, they stubbornly stuck to their original choice.</p><p>“This makes beautiful sense,” says Dahlin. “The experiment was very clever and well-designed.”</p><p>Reflecting on the setup, Chen says she was inspired by parallels she’s seen in human dating. “It’s like they get a first date, and then have some time to get some more experience, and then get another date,” she says. “And that’s helpful for them to make a good decision.”</p><p>The fact remains that any experiment done in a lab can’t fully capture what might happen in the wild. For one thing, prying open a plastic container isn’t the same as scrounging for grub outdoors—but <a href="http://www.otterbein.edu/public/About/Faculty/anna-young">Anna Young</a>, a budgerigar expert at Otterbein University who was not involved in the study, thinks Chen’s setup made for a pretty good approximation. “I can see how solving a cognitive task quickly in the lab could be a proxy for being a good forager in the wild,” she says. “You have to be creative when you’re trying to find food.”</p>
<div class="newsletter"></div>
<p>But there’s more to the equation. Obviously, females looking to mate in the wild aren’t just observing the same pair of males over and over, says Medina-García. In natural contexts, males will actively court females, who are anything but passive onlookers. Rather, budgie displays tend to involve a lot of back-and-forth. “At this point, we don’t know if, given the choice to interact with many males, females will still prefer to pair up with or breed with the same males,” she adds.</p><p>Additionally, Chen’s setup never observed any <i>actual</i> mating; instead, the researchers used the amount of time females spent near each respective male as a proxy for mate choice, Young points out. (Partitioned into a multi-chambered cage, the birds never even made physical contact; the female simply flitted back and forth between two zones corresponding to her feathered fellas.) Parrots might not have the problem of the friend zone, but quality time doesn’t always translate to offspring production. Chasing after flocks of budgies in the Australian outback to manipulate their mating behavior isn’t exactly easy, but additional work will be necessary to confirm that these behaviors actually lead to bona fide couplings.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Melopsittacus_undulatus_-Fort_Worth_Zoo_Texas_.width-990_DihvHI0.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>Nothing gets wild parakeets in the mood quite like rainfall; though they're capable of seasonal breeding, they'll also take advantage of weather changes in Australia's arid outback. Image Credit: Eric Kilby, Wikimedia Commons</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Whether these findings will hold true in other birds—or more distantly related animals, like humans—remains to be seen. But it’s not terribly difficult to relate to the idea of valuing a potential partner’s intellect… even if it means reneging on a previous commitment.</p><p>There’s a reason birds feature so prominently in studies of behavior: These winged wonders are speedy learners and <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/when-it-comes-humans-and-wildlife-whos-bothering-whom-180969567/">adroit puzzle solvers</a>. Even the <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/113/26/7255">internal architecture of their brains</a> bears a striking resemblance to that of primates. “We may need to be more modest about the uniqueness of our own species,” ten Cate says. “I think there are many more parallels in other species—both in mammals and in birds—than people realize.”</p><p>Chen, too, feels kinship. “I mean, I would like to have a smart mate,” she says.</p><p>For now, what’s clear is this: Nerds are perfectly capable of getting girls—no wingman necessary. And in light of findings like these, it might be high time to acknowledge what a boon a birdbrain can be. “I always tell my students we need to reclaim that term,” Dahlin says. “Once we look closely at the behaviors birds engage in, it’s clear they’re comparable to, if not beyond, the behaviors of mammals.”</p>

<p>After watching males succeed at a series of puzzling tasks, female birds traded their simple-minded beaus for more cognitively competent partners.</p>

Adult African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) usually develop spike-like structures at sites of limb amputation. But researchers can now equip these frogs with bioreactors that help them partially regenerate their hind legs. Photo Credit: TimVickers, Wikimedia Commons

A Progesterone-Pumping Device Helps Frogs Regenerate Lost Limbs

<p>Somewhere along our evolutionary trajectory, we humans lost our regenerative powers. Sure, we can manage <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2701258/">a hunk of liver here</a>, <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454966/">the tip of a finger there</a>—but in contrast to the <a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/saving-axolotls/">salamanders</a>, flatworms, and <a href="https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/animals/a27571/starfish-disease-science/">sea stars</a> of the world, the spontaneous remaking of entire organs and limbs eludes humankind.</p><p>For biologist <a href="http://ase.tufts.edu/biology/labs/levin/">Michael Levin</a> of Tufts University, however, “lost” isn’t the same as “nonexistent.”</p><p>Only a few million years separate humans from our closest regenerating relatives. If our animal ancestors built bone and tissue from scratch throughout adulthood, these superpowers may still lie buried within our own tissues, waiting to be reawakened. All it would take, says Levin, is the right signal.</p><p>Now, Levin and his colleagues may have taken the next steps in pinpointing that very trigger by reviving these clandestine capabilities in African clawed frogs. Their work, <a href="https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(18)31573-0">published today</a> in the journal <i>Cell Reports,</i> kick-started the growth of partial but high-functioning hind legs in amphibian amputees after 24 hours of hormonal treatment. Though the work is still preliminary, such findings may someday inform researchers on the path to finding—and flipping—a similar switch in humans.</p>
<div class="ad"></div>
<p>Cut the tail off a tadpole, and <a href="https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/phenomena/2013/01/13/tadpole-heal-thyself-vilified-chemicals-spur-regeneration/">another will take its place</a>. But even in the amphibian world, there are sobering consequences to growing up: If a mature frog loses a leg, the best it can hope for is a frail cartilaginous spike to take its place. This ability is technically regenerative—certainly far more than what any human could accomplish—but the resulting appendage does little for a creature that relies heavily on its hind limbs to navigate its aquatic environment.</p><p>As the frog ages, its regenerative skills seem to go into hibernation—making it “a good stepping stone between animals that [fully] regenerate, like salamanders, and animals that don’t, like mammals,” Levin explains.</p><p>To rouse regeneration from its slumber, the researchers first needed to identify the right molecular alarm. The ideal candidate, they reasoned, would be a powerful chemical cue that is both naturally produced by animal bodies and capable of directing a vast array of cellular functions—a winning combination that, for the researchers, pointed to progesterone.</p>
<div>
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LfcJ13YYbTA?feature=oembed" width="480"></iframe>
</div>
<p>Every month, as a natural part of the female menstrual cycle, progesterone regenerates the entire endometrium, or lining of the uterus. “We thought, ‘It’s impossible that progesterone is <i>only</i> acting at this level,’” explains lead author <a href="http://sites.tufts.edu/celiaherrerarincon/">Celia Herrera-Rincon</a>, a neuroscientist at Tufts University.</p><p>Progesterone wields far more power than simply preparing the uterus for pregnancy. Receptors for this hormone exist all over the bodies of both male and female mammals, and in the past several decades, researchers have shown it to be a potent catalyst for wound healing, promoting <a href="https://docplayer.net/74761056-Role-of-progesterone-in-peripheral-nerve-repair.html">nerve repair</a>, <a href="https://www.cell.com/developmental-cell/fulltext/S1534-5807(01)00064-8?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS1534580701000648%3Fshowall%3Dtrue">bone remodeling</a>, and <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00440.x">blood vessel formation</a>. If applied in the right place at the right time, progesterone could very well coax an injured limb onto a regenerative cascade.</p><p>“Progesterone is very useful and safe,” explains <a href="https://www.popcouncil.org/research/expert/regine-sitruk-ware">Régine Sitruk-Ware</a>, a reproductive endocrinologist at the Population Council’s Center for Biomedical Research who did not participate in the new research. “It’s helpful for the uterus, but in many other layers of the body—in vessels, in bone, in the brain, and in the [nervous system] in general—progesterone has a positive, regenerative aspect.”</p>
<div class="related"></div>
<p>To harness the power of progesterone, the researchers designed a silicon apparatus filled with a hydrating gel and stitched it onto <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161019155533.htm">African clawed frogs</a> (<i>Xenopus laevis</i>) whose right hind legs had been amputated three hours prior. Some of the devices also contained a dose of progesterone, which was steadily fed to the wound site for 24 hours. When the day was up, the team carefully detached the device—and waited.</p><p>Within a matter of weeks, the progesterone-treated frogs had a serious leg up on their peers. In the absence of the hormone, frog amputees produced the typical featureless rods, regardless of whether or not they’d been fitted with the apparatus. But the frogs hit with progesterone began to sprout bigger, more structured appendages. And nearly ten months out from the initial spark of progesterone, partial, paddle-like limbs had pushed their way out of the wound site.</p><p>When the researchers inspected the burgeoning limbs more closely, they found that, unlike the simple, cartilaginous spikes of typical amputees, they seemed to have the form and patterning of true legs. The limbs were thick and full of new blood vessels, nerves, and bone, and were forming what looked like tentative knees: the beginnings of actual joints. These frogs’ legs weren’t just regenerating <i>more</i> than their untreated counterparts—they were regenerating <i>better.</i> It’s a phenomenon that regenerative biologist <a href="http://firm.uni-frankfurt.de/john-barker">John Barker</a> of the Frankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine praises as “smart proliferation”: the ability to form order out of the chaos of growing, dividing cells.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/Herrera-Rincon_Figures_for_Katie_Wu_F8vWy65.width-990_caXgA26.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>Amputation of adult frogs' hind limbs usually results in the formation of a cartilaginous "spike" (left). But attaching a device that feeds progesterone to the amputation site for just 24 hours stimulates the growth of a paddle-like structure (right). The dashed line indicates the plane of amputation. Photo Credit: Celia Herrera-Rincon, Tufts University</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>“It was amazing that we were creating structures with only 24 hours of treatment,” Herrera-Rincon says. “I remember showing Mike [Levin] and being fascinated.”</p><p>When the frogs got the chance to stretch their legs, the untreated, spike-toting regenerates proved to be feeble swimmers and spent more time loitering in place. Meanwhile, the animals that had worn the progesterone-dosing device glided merrily by, almost indistinguishable from their unamputated kin.</p><p>Though the legs could function, the regeneration was far from complete. While the limb that appeared had clear features, the growth stopped abruptly before the frog’s hind digits would otherwise appear. And, importantly, not all the treated frogs responded to the same extent, indicating that the approach is unlikely to be a one-size-fits-all treatment. But for a first pass, Levin says, the amount of regeneration achieved was “really striking.”</p><p>“If the person grew a limb like the frogs did, no one would say it was perfect,” says <a href="https://www.whitedlab.com/">Jessica Whited</a>, a regenerative biologist at Harvard University’s Brigham Regenerative Medicine Center who frequently collaborates with Levin’s lab, but was not involved in the newest finding. “But it’s important to demonstrate something that would be better than what grows naturally.”</p>
<div class="newsletter"></div>
<p>Levin and his team are currently tinkering with their cocktail of apparatus-administered drugs, as well as with the duration for which the device is worn after amputation. With just a few additions and adjustments, he says, the preliminary results are already looking good.</p><p>“To rebuild any structure, you need to give the cells some signal about what they’re rebuilding,” Levin explains. “And progesterone [alone] gives an incomplete message.”</p><p>The rest of this message, Whited adds, will involve a lot of fine-tuning. When limbs grow (and regrow) naturally, they rely on a suite of complex anatomical signals that both drive the production of new tissue and bone and tell it when and where to stop. But the domino effect likely still applies: The key will be finding the right recipe of chemicals to jumpstart the process, then sit back and let nature take its course.</p>
<figure class="richtext-image full-width">
<img alt="" class="richtext-image full-width" src="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/media/images/4819444864_4a99e4cc5b_o.width-990_pGxZHTZ.jpg"/>
<figcaption><p>Deer antlers are mammalian appendages capable of repeated rounds of regeneration. Male deer (and female reindeer) shed and sprout their antlers anew each year. Credit: USFWS Mountain-Prairie, flickr</p>
<div class="credit"><p></p></div>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>“This isn’t ready for human trials… but it’s also not science fiction,” Levin says of the device. “I don’t think humans are barred from regeneration in any fundamental way.”</p><p>We’re not exactly a hop, skip, and a jump away from regenerating limbs in people—even partial ones. Though frogs and humans share quite a few genes and basic anatomical structures, Barker explains, we’re still fundamentally very different creatures. But, even if the packaging varies from species to species, the basic toolkit of regeneration might translate across even fairly far-flung species. There are even <a href="/wgbh/nova/video/extreme-animal-weapons/">mammals that naturally regenerate</a>: Deer regularly <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135727251400226X">regrow their antlers</a> well into adulthood—a process that, not-so-coincidentally, is also driven by sex hormones.</p><p>Even as technology advances, it’s unclear if humans will ever regenerate as slickly as salamanders. But maybe these able-bodied amphibians are inching us just a bit closer: One small leap for a frog may someday mean one giant step for humankind.</p>

<p>Twenty-four hours of the hormone progesterone can kickstart over nine months of limb regeneration in amphibian amputees.</p>

Katherine J. Wu

Articles