Name: A Mind for Music
Uploaded: undefined
Duration: undefined

Nova

NOVA Science Trust Logo

<div class="rich-text">
	Neuroscientist and writer Oliver Sacks has a passion for Bach, while Beethoven leaves him relatively cold. MRI scans reveal that this preference runs deep—it is manifest even in how his neurons respond when he listens to the composers' music. See how it works.
</div>

Watch as neuroscientist Oliver Sacks's brain responds differently to pieces by Bach and Beethoven.

<div class="rich-text">Watch as neuroscientist Oliver Sacks's brain responds differently to pieces by Bach and Beethoven.</div>

Northern Mariana Islands

United States

U.S. Minor Outlying Islands

U.S. Virgin Islands

Guam

American Samoa

Puerto Rico

US & Territories

See neuroscientist Oliver Sacks's brain respond differently to music by Bach & Beethoven.

A Mind for Music

Mind for Music

Body & Brain

<div class="rich-text"><h3>
 A Mind for Music
</h3>

 Posted: June 30, 2009



 NARRATOR:
 
 The well-known writer and neurologist, Oliver Sacks, is exploring the idea of how the brain reacts to music. He is trying to figure out why some brains can't decode music at all while others are sensitive to the slightest musical nuance.



 OLIVER SACKS:
 
 In general, I'm a Bach lover and have always been. You know, even when I was a kid—when I was five—I'm told that I was asked what my favorite things in the world were and I said smoked salmon and Bach and, seventy years later, it's still pretty much the same.



 NARRATOR:
 
 In his quest, Dr. Sacks is offering himself up as a test subject. A 
team of neuroscientists at Columbia University have designed a test that will reveal if the brain of Dr. Sacks loves Bach as much as he does. Hal Hinkle gives Dr. Sacks a device to rate his emotions, while at the same time a scanner will record the activity of his brain. He'll hear two pieces of music: one by Bach and one by Beethoven. First the Bach. Then the Beethoven. 
The composers are different, but the music shares certain qualities.



 HAL HINKLE:
 
 Oliver, that completes the first emotional scan. I would like to hear how that was for you.



 OLIVER SACKS:
 
 The Bach sort of blew me away, especially that point where the soprano came in and there was a wonderful harmonic modulation. But the Beethoven I'm afraid sort of left me flat.



 NARRATOR:
 
 The results of the scan, amazingly, seem to confirm his feelings.



 JOY HIRSCH (Columbia University Medical Center):
 
 What you can see just in an immediate overview here is that this is your Bach brain and this is your Beethoven brain.



 OLIVER SACKS:
 
 Sorry, Ludwig.



 JOY HIRSCH:
 
 Yeah, sorry Ludwig. There's not much there.



 NARRATOR:
 
 Bach clearly excited much of his brain, including the many regions essential to appreciating the complexity of music. But unlike Beethoven, Bach activated the amygdala, which is vital to processing emotions.



 JOY HIRSCH:
 
 Here we see large activity associated with the right amygdala when you're listening to Bach. There is none of that when you're listening this very comparable piece in Beethoven.



 NARRATOR:
 
 But during another part of the test, Dr. Sacks was unable to distinguish Bach from Beethoven.



 HAL HINKLE:
 
 Ah, again, we'd like to hear what your response was to it.



 OLIVER SACKS:
 
 Well, I'm sort of confused. I could hardly differentiate Bach from Beethoven and neither seemed to move me very much.



 NARRATOR:
 
 But his brain tells a different story.



 HAL HINKLE:
 
 The remarkable finding for you was even when you might have thought it was Beethoven...



 OLIVER SACKS:
 
 Even when I was confused...



 HAL HINKLE:
 
 Your brain can tell Bach from Beethoven.



 NARRATOR:
 
 Dr. Sacks clearly favors Bach over Beethoven. Even when he couldn't tell them apart, the brain scan on the left still shows increased activity. So, in fact, his brain recognizes the difference and makes its preference clear.



 OLIVER SACKS:
 
 So my brain knows even when I don't.



 JOY HIRSCH:
 
 That's the conclusion. You're brain can distinguish them even when you don't.
</div>

Colossal explosions shake a remote corner of the Siberian tundra, leaving behind massive craters. In Alaska, a huge lake erupts with bubbles of inflammable gas. Scientists are discovering that these mystifying phenomena add up to a ticking time bomb, as long-frozen permafrost melts and releases vast amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. What are the implications of these dramatic developments in the Arctic? Scientists and local communities alike are struggling to grasp the scale of the methane threat and what it means for our climate future. (Premiered February 2, 2022)

In the Arctic, enormous releases of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, threaten the climate.

Arctic Sinkholes

The top half of Jupiter in blue and green against a night sky

A composite image of Jupiter using images captured by the James Webb Space Telescope. Image Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, Jupiter ERS Team; image processing by Judy Schmidt.

Explore the cosmos, delve into ancient history, and follow an extreme rescue with NOVA’s most-watched documentaries released in 2022.

NOVA’s most popular science documentaries of 2022

Four bright orange loops brand off of a dark blue blob

A transmission electron micrograph of HIV-1 virus particles (orange) replicating from the plasma membrane of an infected H9 T cell. Credit: NIAID, Flickr

Scientists have cured a handful of people of HIV by piggybacking on treatments they received for blood cancer. But does that bring a widespread cure any closer?

Transcript

Credits

Funded By