November 19, 2021

Tim Scott

Rising GOP star Senator Tim Scott, the only Black Republican in the U.S. Senate, discusses growing up in poverty in South Carolina and outlines his policy vision for opportunity zones, school choice and police reform. He weighs in on the GOP in 2024.

GUEST Tim Scott
Read Full Transcript EXPAND

MH: Opportunity knocks… This Week on Firing Line. 

Tim Scott: I felt there was no hope in this country for a little Black boy like me. 

He grew up in poverty in South Carolina with a single mother. Senator Tim Scott is now the only Black Republican in the United States Senate. 

Nikki Haley: Congressman Scott earned this seat.

He’s a rising star in the GOP…

Tim Scott: The next American century can be better than the last. 

who delivered the rebuttal to President Biden.

Tim Scott: Here me clearly: America is not a racist country. 

Scott is passionate about school choice, police reform… 

Scott: No one living in the communities where I  grew up is asking for defunding the police. 

…and opening up economic opportunity zones. Facing a reelection campaign next year and questions about what else his future may hold…

Brian Kilmeade: There’s a buzz about Tim Scott for the presidency.

…what does Senator Tim Scott say now? 

‘Firing Line’ with Margaret Hoover is made possible in part by Robert Granieri, Charles R. Schwab, The Fairweather Foundation, the Asness Family Foundation, and by The Rosalind P. Walter Foundation and Damon Button. Corporate funding is provided by Stephens Inc. and Pfizer Inc.

HOOVER: Senator Tim Scott, welcome to Firing Line.

SCOTT: Thank you. It’s good to be here. 

HOOVER: America’s divided, but you are an eternal optimist.

SCOTT: Yes. 

HOOVER: And you have used your personal story often as evidence of the good news. 

SCOTT: Absolutely. 

HOOVER: A story of the American dream realized.

SCOTT: Yes. 

HOOVER: You grew up in North Charleston with a mom who is a single mom, a nurse’s assistant who worked 16 hour days. Tell me, what is a lesson you learned from your mother that got you to this historic place you are now as a US senator from South Carolina? 

SCOTT: Thank you, Margaret, for that great question. Number one, I love my mom and I’m literally living her American dream. She probably provided me with two or three really important lessons, and to pick one would be hard, so I won’t. First lesson she taught me was that there’s dignity in all work. The second lesson I’d say I got from my mom is that sometimes encouragement isn’t enough. So she was always very encouraging. But every blue moon that she would pull me to the side and look me straight in the eyes and give me a southern form of love and affection and encouragement that came through the form of discipline. The third lesson that came from my mother is to be an eternal optimist, that if you shoot for the Moon, even if you miss — she would tell me a thousand times my freshman year — you’ll be among the stars. That has stuck with me, so when I’m signing pictures to interns I always tell them, dream big.

HOOVER: There are two men who are also important figures to you growing up.  

SCOTT: Absolutely. 

HOOVER: You talk about your grandfather who picked cotton as a young man and in his elder years you learned, never even really learned to read or to write. 

SCOTT: Yes, Yes. 

HOOVER: You also write in your book about John Moniz. Two men, two different political persuasions, perhaps.

SCOTT: Yes. My grandfather, who is a lifelong Democrat — He voted for me. Thank God for that part — and John Moniz, who was a lifelong conservative who died way too young. But they both put their ideology in the back seat as it relates to impacting other people. My grandfather didn’t spend a lot of time talking about Republicans versus Democrats, conservatives versus liberals. He talked about being the right person at the right time, living your life in a way that you’re an example or a model for others. John said, it’s better to create jobs than have a job. It’s better to have a profit than just an income. He was a business owner, a very successful guy. So merging those two people together, where their ideological differences were always in the backseat, and what was in the front seat was the potential they saw in people, what a blessing for me. 

HOOVER: So you describe yourself in high school as a student who is floundering a bit. And there were some key teachers who focused on you and encouraged you to work harder to be better. You have called education the closest thing to magic we have in America. 

SCOTT: Yes.

HOOVER: So at the federal level, Senator Scott– You know, President Bush had No Child Left Behind. President Obama had Race to the Top. President Trump supported an education tax credit though it never passed. What could this administration do? 

SCOTT: Well, there are a couple of things that I think we should look at in education. And let’s start with those kids in Title One schools. These are typically the kids that are living in the poorest zip codes in America. If you’re not in those zip codes, typically you choose the house that you want to live in based on the school you want your child to go to. It’s only those kids going to Title One schools that are not afforded any options or any choice in this nation as it relates to education. And so let’s start with Title One schools, and let’s do what we’re doing right here in Washington, D.C. D.C. has something called the Opportunity Scholarship Program, supported by Cory Booker, Dianne Feinstein, Ron John and myself. About nine out of 10 of those kids that graduate go on to four-year college through an opportunity scholarship program. If we did that all across America, if we just basically replicated the Success Academy in New York City or the Meeting Street Academy in Charleston, South Carolina, we would have the vast majority of kids living in poverty, single parent households, 95 percent getting free lunch, they would be performing the top 20 percent of kids, no matter the color of their skin, no matter their economics, in this country. We’re proving that it can be done. Let’s replicate that throughout every single Title One school in America and our OECD competitors would say, ‘Oh my gosh, life has changed permanently for the world because we will be educating our poorest, underserved communities in a world class way.

HOOVER: You mentioned that Democrat Cory Booker and Democrat Dianne Feinstein support opportunity charter schools in Washington, D.C. 

SCOTT: Yes. 

HOOVER: Do you think they’d support it nationally the way you suggest should happen? 

SCOTT: Well, they certainly should. 

HOOVER: But will they?

SCOTT: If we would do it in one place, won’t they do it every place else?

HOOVER: But they won’t do it somewhere else?

SCOTT: Mayor Booker did support charter schools as mayor in New Jersey, so I’m hoping that we could find the path forward. 

HOOVER: So Republican Glenn Youngkin just won a race to be governor of Virginia. And one of the central issues of that campaign revolved around what is being taught in schools and whether parents should have a say in what’s being taught in the schools. And in your response to President Biden’s joint address to Congress back in April, you said, “Kids again are being taught that the color of their skin defines them. And if they look a certain way, they’re an oppressor.” So explain what you see happening.

SCOTT: Well, here’s what I’ll tell you. In education, we should never teach people that any form of discrimination is OK. It’s kind of that simple. And as a kid who went to public high schools and who understands the challenges of race in America intimately and personally, I can tell you that I benefited from not having curriculum designed around racial outcomes or oppressed versus oppressors. Why don’t we spend more time talking about the windshield as it relates to race than the rearview mirror about race? In other words, why don’t we talk about the future of race relations and what we’re doing to make this country better for everyone as opposed to looking back. Here’s what I think. Number one, we’ve made more progress in the last 50 years than we did the first 190. Number two, we still have a ways to go. Both can be true because both are true. And if we were to celebrate the progress, at the same time looking for ways to address the problems, I think most Americans would lean into that position. But what we don’t want is to have our kids indoctrinated on any topic. We want to teach our kids how to think, not what to think. And that’s what’s missing. 

HOOVER: You just mentioned the the OECD rankings– 

SCOTT: Our competitors. 

HOOVER: –where American students are ranking in reading, writing and arithmetic compared to our competitors. And it strikes me, Senator, that in an era where educational content is so politicized, how do you focus federally and then at the state and local level on simply getting the basics right? 

SCOTT: That’s a great question. I think we get there by focusing on reading, writing and arithmetic. I would throw in there focusing on STEM. If we’re not doing that, we’re losing the ballgame, so to speak. Margaret, let me ask you this question. Do we have– I think the answer is yes, by the way — do we have the best colleges and universities in the world? 

HOOVER: No question.

SCOTT: So why don’t we make sure that our K through 12 reflects the same quality of opportunity. We shouldn’t deny that to the poorest kids in the poorest zip codes by having a broken system in their neighborhoods. So improving the plight of our Title One kids is to improve the output of our nation. And it’s the best and most effective way, the most cost effective way, to create a global competition where we’re in charge. 

HOW HE BECAME A REPUBLICAN

HOOVER: I read this one part of your book, which I loved, the story about how you went as a young aspiring political candidate to the Democratic Party in South Carolina.

SCOTT: Yes. Oh yes.

HOOVER: And it didn’t go as you expected. 

SCOTT: No, it did not 

HOOVER: Tell me what happened. 

SCOTT: Well as a young African-American kid growing up in South Carolina almost everybody that I knew who was Black was a Democrat. So all my leanings were conservative and I said that very consistently. Interestingly enough, what I came to the conclusion very quickly was, I should give the Democrats a try. I mean, this is what everyone that I know is doing. And so I went to the Democrat, they had a convention in downtown Charleston. I walked in there and I, and I saw a state senator. I’ll never forget. I walked up to him and said, ‘Hey I’m Tim Scott and I’m looking at running for county council, the seat’s just been vacated so it’s an open seat.’ And he’s like, ‘You know, young man, you may have some potential there, but you need to get in the back of the line, serve your way to the front of the line.’ I was like, that sounds terrible. If you’ve got the burning desire to run, you should run. I went back to my friends, who I’d been talking to already, within the Republican Party. And they said, ‘Tim you do realize that there’s never been a Black elected countywide as a Republican.’ I’m like, I know, and he said, ‘Well, if you’re willing to try, we will support you. Your philosophy and your values matches ours. Let’s do it.’ And Grace of God and the voters of Charleston County, I was able to win that first race comfortably and it worked out really well. 

HOOVER: You say you’re called to serve all Americans, not just Black Americans, and you emphasize the progress in America. Talk about the progress.

SCOTT: OK, well, I’ll tell you what, when I was in high school, the N-word was a weekly, every-other-week experience. I mean, I heard it a lot. So we had tension in high school– 

HOOVER: Directed at you personally?

SCOTT: Oh yeah, I used to have, we called them N-notes, left in my locker. It was painful at times. So we had some racial challenges. But at the same time, I had Black kids who thought I had too many white friends, so they would call me Oreo. But and so, I’m talking about an environment where racial tension was thick. I could feel it walking down the hallways. Fast forward to ten or 15 years later. I’m in business. I’m working for myself.  I’m meeting people. Lots of my clients are white. Lots of my clients are Black. And so I started experiencing that economically there was opportunity for someone who works really hard, shows up and asks for the sale. I’m not sure that was true for my grandfather. My grandfather, born in 1921 in South Carolina, experienced a very different South Carolina. He had to get off the sidewalk when a white person was coming. He couldn’t look you in the eye. My mother was born in 1944 during a time where all the water fountains were colored or white. But by the time I am in high school, where we had tension, you also had people sitting together and hanging out. Fast forward to my nephew, who just graduated from every school in the world: Georgia Tech, Duke, Emory, and now he’s at Tufts in his second year of residency, right? And here’s a kid, when I brought all of his friends to lunch after graduation, it looked like the United Nations. I can’t look at that and say, ‘Boy, we’re going backwards.’ It’s absolutely not true. We are going forward by leaps, very quickly. I look at the fact that we’ve elected the first African-American president. I’m the first African-American to be ever elected to Congress and the United States Senate and the history of the country. We’ve seen so much progress. We have so much to celebrate. But we’re also, by the way, the only country I think in the history of the world where the majority of the population fought each other to make sure that all people living in America are recognized of equal value and intrinsic worth. That has never been done anywhere in the world. And so we should celebrate all those areas of progress, but those are hopefully some signs of the progress that I see in the country.

HOOVER: Senator, here’s something that struck me in your book. You describe the shock and the hurt that your staffers have felt when they have encountered racism directed at you. And you describe that you have been pulled over by police 18 times– 

SCOTT: Now 22. 

HOOVER: –as evidence of profiling. And I wonder as you look in the windshield, what more needs to be done? 

SCOTT: Well, listen, police reform and criminal justice reform or two hot topics that I’ve worked on for the last, more than a half a decade. Criminal justice reform, First Step Act, we got signed with President Trump. I am so thankful that we started to recalibrate our justice system to make it more fair in its sentencing. On police reform, I think there’s still too many stops that are simply driving while Black. I think the vast majority of officers are doing their jobs and doing it very well. I thank God that people do it as a mission, that they believe that their life’s work is to protect other people. When we find those bad apples, we should find them and get rid of them, get them out of the police work. Because a good cop wants to get rid of a bad cop more than any other person in the country. And so I want to make sure that we continue to shine light in the area and then provide the resources, be it money or training, to make sure that only the best wear the badge. So I think the whole footprint of the justice system still needs work and we should continue to work on that. It’s a very important part of realizing your full rights as an American citizen. 

HOOVER: Can I ask you… 

SCOTT: Yes, ma’am.  

HOOVER: I mean you were working very closely with Karen Bass in the House and with Cory Booker in the Senate to pass police reform in the wake of George Floyd’s murder, and it petered out. 

SCOTT: Yes. 

HOOVER: What happened? I think there’s very little visibility.

SCOTT: Two things. I’d say that the first time the Democrats walked away from the table. They said, ‘this isn’t a negotiation we’re leaving,’ and one of the Democrats got up and she walked out. And so, truth be told, I don’t know why they keep walking away from such an important table. I have set my settings out. I’m here for the long haul. I think that this is something we have to get done. Let me give you some good news, though, on this topic. There were like four or five areas that we all agreed on. 

HOOVER: There was compromise everybody agreed on. Isn’t something better than nothing? 

SCOTT: That’s exactly the question I was going to end with. So you got there faster. You’re smarter than that. This is exactly where we should end. Is something better than nothing? The answer, absolutely it is. But they wanted even more. And what they wanted was essentially federalizing local law enforcement, and still fighting over the funding that departments would be eligible for. Those two I hope we can find a path around. I’m not going to reduce funding and I’m not going to federalize local law enforcement. 

OPPORTUNITY ZONES

HOOVER: So you tell a story in your book about meeting Congressman Jack Kemp.

SCOTT: Oh yes.

HOOVER: This program, Firing Line, is a reboot of the original Firing Line hosted by William F. Buckley Jr. And Jack Kemp was a guest on that program. 

KEMP: Let me say as a Republican and as a bleeding heart conservative Republican that we need Democrats. They are on this earth to redistribute wealth. But that presupposes, ladies and gentlemen, that there will be a party in America that understands how to create wealth, create opportunity, create economic growth. My friend Gary Hart suggested that government is the engine of economic growth. With all due respect, it is not. Free men, free women, free markets, free enterprise, private property and unleashing the potential for entrepreneurial activity and opportunities for people to work and to save and invest and produce and yes, take a risk, and yes, make a profit, is the single greatest engine of economic growth the world has ever known, and it will work wherever it’s tried. [applause]

HOOVER: So Jack Kemp was also an early advocate of what he called enterprise zones, which are probably, maybe a precursor–

SCOTT: A hundred percent. It is the forerunner–

HOOVER:  –to the opportunity zones, right? Which you I think get too little credit for what a prominent role and leadership role you took for that piece of legislation, that part of President Trump’s Tax Cut and Jobs Act. 

SCOTT: Absolutely.

HOOVER: Explain for our audience what is an opportunity zone? 

SCOTT: Well, Margaret, first let me just say watching Jack Kemp talk I was like, man, I wish I was that good. I literally crafted the legislation off of his enterprise zones. He believed that people living in marginalized communities deserved the right to make decisions for their own communities, for their own lives, and that required resourcing. He wanted the government to come in and do more. The one thing I changed about his approach was instead of having the government do more, let’s get the private sector.  Because what he said was 100 percent right. It’s the private sector that is the economic engine of change and opportunity. So I wanted to take that concept and put it in legislation. And opportunity zones is that legislation. It attracts the private sector, when they make a profit, to come back to marginalized communities that are disproportionately majority minority, and invest money long term. What I do not want, what I did not want, and I will not ever want is for people to come into a community, make a profit off the community, and run away with their money. I wanted them to plant roots for five, seven, 10 years. And frankly, $75 billion dollars in just three years has been committed to opportunity zones, where on average we’ve seen property values go up double digit, which means that we’re closing the wealth gap because the gentrification rate is under five percent in those zones, meaning that the people who are there are benefiting from what’s happening in their backyards. 

HOOVER: So as the author of the bill, you’re in the best position to take on some of the criticisms. 

SCOTT: Yes. 

HOOVER: And President Biden argued on the campaign trail that there were elements of opportunity zones that needed to be fixed. 

SCOTT: Well, Yes. 

HOOVER: What needs to be reformed about it? Is he right?

SCOTT: Well, I think the first thing that we need to know– we don’t know whether he’s right. What we’ve seen is most of the information that we’ve seen is very positive. Here’s what else we can do. We should require every single opportunity fund to report what they’re doing with the money to the IRS. So we can actually measure whether these are boondoggles, cherry picked, or are they hitting the target like we know that they are. And that would give us a chance to then, if there are reforms that need to be made, let’s do it. But this is a program, by the way, celebrated by Mayor Bowser here in the D.C. area, Compton, California, to my good friend John Gettys, a Democrat mayor in Rock Hill, South Carolina. The only place where you will not find that people say it works, here in Washington, D.C., where they want to take more of your money, control more of your life and make the decisions for you.

HOOVER: You wrote at the beginning of the book about standing shoulder to shoulder with the late John Lewis and crossing the Edmund Pettus Bridge on the 50th anniversary of Bloody Sunday. And you say that voting rights are personal, and particularly as a Black voter in the South. And that Republican support should be making it easier to vote and harder to cheat. 

SCOTT: Absolutely. 

HOOVER: What needs to happen to make it easier to vote?

SCOTT: I think if you look at the Georgia law, this is a classic example of something that’s actually making it easier to vote. Most of the people who have demonized the law didn’t really read the law. So they’re going on headlines. And God bless headlines, but they’re not always the most accurate. Before the pandemic, it was illegal to have a drop box where you could drop your votes off. In the Georgia law it codifies and makes it legal to have drop boxes. There’s a big debate over early voting, and I think it’s a worthy debate. In Georgia, there are more early voting days than in blue states throughout the country. So more days to vote early. And they call it ‘souls to the polls,’ right? So. What does that mean? It means on Sundays you can vote because it’s the day that a lot of people have off. So they made that available and they added an additional Saturday within that window before you go vote on the Election Day to be able to vote. The federal law, H.R. 1, which is the way that the Democrats wanted to take it, says tax dollars should go into my personal campaign account. That’s wrong. Why would we compel Democrats to put money into a Republican campaign account, or Republicans into a Democrat’s campaign account? Number two, we should not make ballot harvesting legal. We shouldn’t allow for one person to pick up hundreds, if not thousands of ballots and decide which ones they turn in, and which ones they don’t turn in. That’s the kind of stuff that we don’t need.

HOOVER: So that’s the harder to cheat part. 

SCOTT: Exactly. 

HOOVER: Do you believe that voter fraud is a widespread problem? 

SCOTT: I don’t. I think that voter integrity is a widespread issue. I think voter fraud versus voter integrity are very different. Let me explain to you what I mean. In Pennsylvania they changed, they allowed for a mail in ballots for essentially widespread mail in ballots for the first time, and they didn’t build a system for it. So that wasn’t voter fraud. It may have led to fraudulent activity that we had legalized. What went wrong, in my opinion, is that we simply had a new system of voting without a whole lot of safeguards in there. 

HOOVER: But you disagree with this notion that it’s a widespread problem in terms of fraud in our elections.

SCOTT: I absolutely think that we can secure our elections better. And one of the ways that we do that is by passing the laws that you’re seeing across the country. 

HOOVER: Final question. Just last month, you had said, of course you would support President Trump if he runs for president in 2024. Is he your top choice? 

SCOTT: Well, I don’t know who’s going to run. The question is would I support President Trump or would I support any other Republican nominee to be president of the United States versus someone who believes that the road to socialism is the right way to take this country. I would support any Republican that ran for president who won our nomination, without any question. That was an easy decision to say. 

HOOVER: But if other Republicans are in the race, is he your preferred candidate? 

SCOTT: Well, here’s what I’d say. I think President Trump is a force to be reckoned with within the Republican Party. I won’t pretend that he’s not, and I won’t suggest that there’s somebody who can take him out. So at this point, I’m hopeful that A, I get reelected to be the senator of South Carolina and B, that we have a united Republican Party running to change and bring optimism and hope to this nation. 

HOOVER: Senator Tim Scott, thank you for joining me. 

SCOTT: Absolutely. Thank you, ma’am. 

HOOVER: You’re welcome back any time. 

SCOTT: Look forward to coming back.

‘Firing Line’ with Margaret Hoover is made possible in part by Robert Granieri, Charles R. Schwab, The Fairweather Foundation, the Asness Family Foundation, and by The Rosalind P. Walter Foundation and Damon Button. Corporate funding is provided by Stephens Inc. and Pfizer Inc.