Q: And Jesse Helms is another one
of those candidates you'd be happy to vote for.
CASTELLANOS: Oh, sure. I don't agree
with Jesse Helms on everything. But I agree with him on the big things.
And there's a great old story about Robert Mitchum and Humphrey Bogart
in some bar together. And right before they both passed out Mitchum
told Humphrey Bogart, you know, there's one piece of advice I'll give
you, and whatever it is, be against it. And at a time when government
is, has such an inordinately big and wrong role in everybody's life,
here's a guy who came up here when it wasn't popular and said government
was too big, had too much of your money, and you, you were a more important
person than that to let somebody else take that away from you. You know,
that's important. He changed things in this country. Just like a Newt
Gingrich.
Q: And you'd vote for him?
CASTELLANOS: The world has changed.
You know, they've done I think, they've done their big missions here.
They've changed the country. Now those radical things that, I remember
when we first started, when I first started doing politics, it wasn't
popular even to "be a conservative." Now more people identify themselves
as conservatives than liberal. You know, liberal is such a discredited
term that the most sensitive barometer of such matters that we have
in this country, Bill Clinton, you know, doesn't even, doesn't even
use the term, runs from it, so I think they've made a big change.
Q: I wanted to go back to one thing
you said about the "Hand" spot, but to ask you a more general
question about the role of polling in creating messages. How important
is that part of the process?
CASTELLANOS: Polling is, is like
a road map in a campaign. It doesn't tell you where to go, you've got
to decide where you want to go, what you believe in, but once you decide
that, it can show you how to get there.
That's the right way to use a survey. You know, and people can play
it very differently. It's a sheet music. You know, two guys can sit
down at the piano and look at the notes and play them very different
ways. So how you tell the story can be very different. The, you can't
use a survey to set a goal in a campaign. To develop your strategy.
You can set a, you can use a survey to help execute a strategy. But
ultimately you've got to believe in something.
The campaigns that get lost are the ones that spend all the time looking
in the rear view mirror at what, looking for their followers to lead
them in a survey, and that's death. That's the end of a political leader
if he's marching behind the parade.
So, the argument is sometimes made that political spots are more about
polling than they are the candidates principles. I think the Clinton
campaign is a good example of that. You know, that's if you want to
see what was on Bill Clinton's last survey, look at his next spot. His
whole campaign last time was nothing but survey tested proven nuggets,
none of which the President particularly believes.
I mean, this guy did not run for President because he thought America
needed school uniforms. You know, it's, it's stuff you say and do to
get yourself elected. And I think that does lessen people's confidence
in the process, in democracy. And I think it's a very bad thing. I think
that's why, you know, I only work for candidates who believe in things.
Because otherwise it's, it's kind of that self-consuming spiral where
we kind of eat our own tails. We start looking at, at surveys to, to
find out what voters believe and figure out how to give them that. You
know, you only, you only remain where you are that way.
Q: But to some extent ads are about
us, as well as being about as well as being about the candidate.
CASTELLANOS: Yeah. But you don't
need, you don't need a survey to figure out what's right and wrong.
The, you know, Xerox. A long time ago a company did a focus group to
figure out if America would pay 5 cents for a paper copy as opposed
to a thermographic copy that they could get for a penny and a half.
Well the research, the surveys, the focus groups conclusively proved
that Americans weren't willing to pay a nickel for a paper copy. And
fortunately Xerox ignored all that research and the surveys. Did it,
and built a company.
You know, nobody invented the walkman because they did a survey and
said you know what Americans really tell us they need is a little box
to run around next to their ear that they can listen to while they jog.
No. You, you create it, you, and then you put it out there.
It's like religion, you, you don't believe in God, you don't believe
in what's right and wrong because you take a survey. You don't believe
in freedom, you don't believe in, in America, you don't believe in,
in helping people, you don't believe that's your responsibility as opposed
to hiring somebody to do it for you because you take a survey.
Q: A couple of questions about the
Dole campaign finally. You mentioned the Clinton spots, but the Clinton
spots were also good examples of comparatives. Bob Squier did a lot
of...
CASTELLANOS: Great spots.
Q: ...my guy believes in increasing
the minimum wage, Bob Dole doesn't. My guy believes in medicare, Bob
Dole doesn't.
CASTELLANOS: Good solid comparative advertising. What American
needs more of. I think the Dole campaign, the fundamental problem is
that we were campaigning without a candidate. Bob Dole's a great guy
but he didn't really have a clear direction of where he wanted to lead
the country. He didn't believe. He was, I think, in many ways, he was
very happy that he got the Republican nomination. But he couldn't stand
there and say I see America twenty years from now, follow me. And, again,
you know, spending $70 million bucks with nothing to say, is about the
worst thing that can happen to anybody. And that's what happened in
that presidential campaign.
Q: There's a Clinton spot that I
remember in particular that illustrates some of what you're saying that
was pretty damning which was just a spot that contained various words
of Mr. Dole's concluding with him saying, sort of amusingly, well, maybe
we don't need a President, but I guess we're going to have one and so
that's why I'm out here.
CASTELLANOS: Politics and television
are very cruel. They consume you. Especially politics in the television
age will just devour you if you have no substance. You've got to be
big and strong and, and have a center.
You know, what's the old poem, the center does not hold, that is true
today. Things move so fast that unless there is something at your core,
Washington, television, and politics will just devour you.
Q: But there was a core to Bob Dole
and it's that little cigar box, isn't it?
CASTELLANOS: Yeah. That was the
best story to tell about Bob Dole. And it turns out that, in retrospect,that
a decent, you know, he's a decent man, at a time when a lot of folks
didn't feel that was terribly important. They might feel differently
today. You know, Bill Clinton, I think, was elected in a lot of ways
because the country already had a president. A Republican Congress and
they needed a little bit of the brake pedal on the car. Clinton's kind
of our national insurance policy. He's there to tap the brake pedal
to make sure the Republican's don't go too far, too fast. And don't
hurt anybody along the way. He's not there to drive anything just kind
of to make sure the change is not too scary. So, you know, we've had
divided government in this country, I think, two out of three times,
I think, since 1952. America's very comfortable with an accelerator
and a brake. And with a Republican Congress running things, America
felt, I think, a little more comfortable with Bill Clinton than, than
Bob Dole.
Q: Is the cigar box spot your favorite
of the Dole spots, is that the best?
CASTELLANOS: My favorite spot of
Bob Dole is a spot, two I guess. One of my favorite spots of Bob Dole
was a, was a little bio we did, that tells that story of the kid from
Russell who had the courage to pick himself up after he'd fallen. And
learn to walk again.
But my other favorite spot is the spot I really like the best about
the Dole campaign is one that never ran. And that's how to speak liberal.
Which was not a spot about being liberal at all but about the other
L word, lying which the President did. But the campaign decided that
it was alright for, for the President to do it but it wasn't alright
for us to talk about it or to say that the President lied. I think we
did it in a light way and a humorous way but it would have put the spotlight
back on, on Clinton. Which a reelection campaign wants to do that.
A reelection campaign wants to be a referendum on the incumbent. This
last election should have been a referendum on Bill Clinton. "Do
we want to keep him?" And instead the Clinton people, I think,
used advertising very well to keep the spotlight on Bob Dole, what's
wrong with him. But that was my favorite spot, how to speak liberal.
Q: Lastly, two things, describe
first, the spot you'd really ought to see.
CASTELLANOS: Oh, I, I don't know.
That's a tough question. There's an old, I don't know how to answer
that question. I've made some spots, I think. You know, I've made some
for campaigns that have won, and campaigns that have lost. Whenever
you, you capture something big and true and reveal it in a real powerful
way, you know, if you can, if you make somebody feel something and it
makes them feel bigger and better. That's, that's the most powerful
thing. If you, if you inform something about, that helps protect them
or helps change things, that's good.
There's an old Hal Riney spot about, I don't know if you've ever seen
but, that's just incredibly emotional and powerful about what being
a dad is, and what being a family is and all that. I love that spot.
If I could ever do anything like that I'd have to quit I guess. But,
ultimately it's about winning elections.
You know, the work you feel proudest of...we've done some great work
and lost. There's no silver medal in this business. Ultimately it is
about changing things. And the only way you can do that is to win. So
the most rewarding campaigns are the ones where you're the first to
cross the finish line.
Q: And yet someone like David Broder
would say, that's also the problem. That political commercials and campaigns
are too focused on winning as opposed to who can govern best.
CASTELLANOS: Well if they, if they'd
ever let the loser in an election govern maybe it would be different.
You know, but nobody, you don't play the Super Bowl for second place.
It's, it's not the American way and again it's that wonderful conflict.
Anybody whose been married knows how important conflict is. A happy
marriage, a peaceful marriage is a dead marriage. There's always give
and take. It's how things, how you grow, you move forward, how you learn
about each other, how you build things so, I think conflict is wonderful.
It's, beats the amoeba.
Q: Should I call your wife?
CASTELLANOS: It's true though. Life
is like that. There's a reason it's like that. There's a reason it's
like that. I mean, nature took a zillion years to work this out. And
this is the best and the most creative thing for, I mean, the most progressive
tool we have, is conflict. They call it creative destruction. And it's
true that way not just in politics, it's true in science. You know,
thesis, synthesis, antithesis a new synthesis out there. Some experiments
fail, some succeed. It's true that way in businesses, some fail, some
don't work. That, the competition is everywhere. It's the best vehicle
we have.
Q: Lastly, what would you like to
not see in commercials, Doug Bailey wrote a piece in the National Journal
that he doesn't want to see anybody messing the kids hair anymore in
a commercial. What would be some scenes that you would love to not ever
have to see in a commercial anymore.
CASTELLANOS: Well, I'd love not
to see Bill Clinton protecting our values. I'd love not to see candidates
doing it for the children. When, you know, it's, it's kind of the last
refuge of the scoundrel used to be patriotism, now it's doing it for
the children. I don't know, you know, I think voters are so much smarter
than people give them credit for. They're very cynical now about the
process because they have a right to be. The product doesn't work very
well. And so, all the salesman are kind of looked upon as scants. So,
I think voters are, you know, they'll tune out the stuff that's far
from the truth.
|
|

|