Newsweek, Architecture, March 28, 1949
Medal for a Titan
Evaluations: It is ironic that a man who was for 30 years too radical to feel at home in the AIA is now regarded by some of his more austere young professional grandchildren as a bit old-fashioned and romantic. As in the case of any and all criticisms aimed his way, Wright has made a characteristic written response to this one: From my point of view (as a modern architect of course) the Center of what we call romance has shifted; I find it lying no longer upon the periphery of things... I find it as a new sense of reality, a new adventure thrilling in search for reality. If there is anything more romantic than that, it has not appeared in my life, and I do not think it will appear in yourthe hazards, the great rewards, the incomparable beauties, the unreasonable punishments, all go to make life romantic.
© 1949 Newsweek. Used with permission; all rights reserved.
Saturday Review, Nov. 7, 1959, Japanese influence
He said that his observations and his convictions on architecture found confirmation in Mayan and Japanese designs. I think he admired the Japanese because they work in wood and have a great understanding of the simplicity and possible refinements of that material. Also, the Japanese have the idea of the open plan. They open one space into another by sliding screens and panels. Their roof lines sweep low to the ground, and their concern with nature as an integral part of their building is very much in the spirit of Mr. Wrights work.
Andre Chastel wrote in Le Monde, Nothing was ever more deliberately or more profoundly American than the personality and career of Frank Lloyd Wright. You might define him as a hero in the sense of Emerson, as a prophet in the sense of Whitman, as an adventurer in the sense of Melville. He possessed to the highest degree the self-confidence, the provocative originality, the stubborn, stunning faith in the goodness of nature and the happy bent of man without which you leave no imprint of yourself...
Reprinted by permission of The Saturday Review, © 1979, General Media Communications, Inc.
New York Times Of Form in Architecture, 1931
Thirty years ago at a meeting in the Hull House, Chicago, called to form a Society of Arts and Crafts, Frank Lloyd Wright read a paper, The Art and Craft of the Machine, in which he proposed that the society should be formed to make a patient study of the machine at work as the first duty of the modern artist. He had invited to be present at the occasion a number of sheet-metal, marble, tile, iron and wood workersmen who were actually turning out the work for the architects and builders of the city.
Before this audience, recounts Wright, several brilliant disciples of Ruskin and Morris from the University of Chicago swept my propositions aside in a flood of sentimental eloquence. I was voted down and out . . . . and the society was formed upon the same old basis of pounding ones fingers making useless things that had been the basis of countless other Art Societies that had come to nothing in the end.
That was thirty years ago: the proposition has never yet appealed to the American artist, and, in the meantime, the engineer has become the god in the machine.
© The New York Times. Reprinted by