| Farmed and Dangerous? 
| What would you recommend for students wanting to pursue a similar   career?Chopin: Get out there, attend conferences and be open to what is   happening around you.
 Read 	Thierry Chopin's full Q&A » What would you say has been your greatest achievement?Robinson: I   would say that one of our greatest achievements, as a team, has been   successfully bringing more advanced ecological concepts to the aquaculture food   production industry.
 Read Shawn Robinson full Q&A »
 What do you like best about your profession?O'Hanlon: Working miles   out, in and under the sea. Being around marine life. Seeing people enjoy our   products.
 Read 	Brian O'Hanlon's full Q&A »
 |  Next time you head to your friendly supermarket, stop  by the seafood section. Much of what you see on the crushed ice came not from  the ocean wilderness but from a farm. With wild fish stocks declining, the  world’s population and demand for global seafood soaring, the requests for  farmed fish are skyrocketing. Farming fish might seem to reduce pressures off  wild stock, wouldn’t it? The answer may surprise you.
 
|    farmed fish
 |  Fish farming, or aquaculture, already produces nearly  half the fish we consume, reports the United Nations Food and Agricultural  Organization (FAO). Some call this the “Blue Revolution.”But as the industry explodes, critics argue the gains  may not be worth the costs. Just as intensive farming practices on land can  pollute and spread diseases—think industrial-scale feedlot waste and Escherichia coli  (E. coli) epidemics—so too can  irresponsible aquaculture. The litany of past and current grievances is long and  extensive. Farming fish releases polluting nutrients, pesticides and  antibiotics into coastal waters along with occasional escapees that can  genetically weaken wild stock. Fish parasites, called sea lice, can spill out of pens and jeopardize wild  species. Of greatest concern is that farming carnivorous fish, like  salmon and snapper, requires fishmeal, which is derived from wild fish—an  increasingly finite resource. In a typical salmon farm, many pounds of wild  fish are used to make one pound of farmed fish. And as demand for these  carnivorous fish increases, so too will demand for their wild-caught food. All  these woes underscore the fact that we’re still on the steep side of the  learning curve when it comes to global aquaculture. Science and effective  regulation have simply lagged behind booming entrepreneurship. Progress will  require innovation from all directions. Canadians Thierry Chopin and Shawn Robinson are working with the salmon industry to encourage the  creation of “whole ecosystem” farms. These farms involve multiple  marketable species instead of single-species farms—an idea that stems back to ancient Chinese  aquaculture techniques. Scientists call this type of farming Integrated  Multi-Trophic Aquaculture. “What  we are doing is relatively simple with salmon, mussels and seaweed,” Chopin  states.  “We will make it a little more complicated with sea cucumbers,  sea urchins, worms and all these things. But really, it’s nothing more than  recreating a balanced ecosystem.” And this design has added benefits.  According to Robinson, farming filter-feeding shellfish alongside salmon not  only significantly reduces waste that spills out from the fish pens, but also  the possibility of virulent diseases like infectious salmon anemia. Reports  from Norway’s Institute of Marine Research, suggest the blue  mussel, Mytilus edulis, can consume  and inactivate the anemia virus with no ill effects to edibility of this  shellfish. 
|    fish ready for purchase
 |  
Other  farmers like Brian O’Hanlon in Puerto Rico are  undertaking a technique called offshore aquaculture. This methodology enlists the natural flushing of open  ocean currents to keep fish relatively disease-free. Considerable sums of money  are being put forth to research this fish farming strategy. If offshore aquaculture  expands too rapidly however it remains to be seen whether or not dilution will  remain the solution to its pollution. Also of concern is the fact that current  offshore aquaculture operations focus primarily on raising carnivorous fish. As  such O’Hanlon and others like him are in a fast advancing area of research—racing to redesign fish  feed that requires less fishmeal and as such less wild fish.  With such products and innovations, all  parties are hopeful that aquaculture can progress rapidly enough to help meet  the rising challenges of global protein demands. We can help. Here’s how: 
           Think about the fish you buy and make wise choices at  the market. The Marine Stewardship Council, Seafood Choices Alliance  and other  organizations can provide valuable insight into the lives and costs behind  farmed versus wild-caught produce. See our  interactive market for details.Consider limiting your consumption of fish or  purchasing herbivorous fish like Tilapia,  carp and catfish. These species do not require wild fish in their diets and  thus can provide a net gain in global fish numbers instead of a net loss.Support fish  farming policies, fisheries management and exporters that keep the health of  the whole ecosystem in mind. All aquaculture requires healthy clean water  supplies in order to flourish. Without clean water, we can’t have clean fish. For more solutions visit: What can we do? 
| References |  
| » | Skerry, B. (April 2007). The Greening of the Blue. National Geographic Magazine. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0704/feature1/gallery22.html  |   | 
| » | Fish Info Network from Globefish. Globefish is the  unit in the Food and Agricultural Organization’s (FAO) Fisheries Department  responsible for information on international fish trade.www.globefish.org/index.php?id=4286  |  
|  |  
| » | Ridler, N.,  M.  Wowchuk, K. Barrington, T. Chopin, S. Robinson, F. Page and K. Haya  (2007). Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA): A potential strategic choice for farmers.  Aqua.  Econ. Manag. 11(1):99—110.  Also see:http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/Story/maritimes/multi_trophic_e.htm  |  
|  |  
| » | Skar, C. and S. Mortensen  (2007) Fate of infectious salmon anaemia virus (ISAV) in experimentally  challenged blue mussels Mytilus edulis, Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 74: 1—6. |  
|  |  For more go to the Resources section » 
 |