Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
As all you Darwin fans out there probably already know, today marks the 150th anniversary of the great man's work, 'On the Origin of Species.'  And here at NOVA we have been ramping up for this event for some time.

While Darwin's 200th birthday (last February) was celebrated with gusto, I think it's equally (if not more) important to toast his decision to publish his 'dangerous idea' about evolution.  This was something he struggled long and hard with - until one day a letter arrived in the mail that would force his hand.

darwinspre-interactive.jpg
Where did all the mammoths go?

Knight_Mastodon.jpg
15,000 years ago, mammoths, sloths, mastodons, and their giant friends were lumbering around North America, munching plants and admiring each other's tusks. (Except the sloths--no tusks there.) Then, something killed them all off. In Last Extinction (watch online), which premiered last spring, NOVA took on the headline-grabbing hypothesis that a comet wiped out the beasts. But a new study of ancient dung fungus (who said science was glamorous?) suggests that the behemoths were on their way out the door thousands of years before the alleged comet slammed it behind them.

user-pic

Seeing by tongue

Introducing another guest post from our intern Bo Zhang! Read more of Bo's work at Free Radicals, from Boston University's Center for Science and Medical Journalism. Now, here's Bo:

There has been a burst of research on restoring the blind's sight lately, including the development of an artificial retina and a gene therapy treatment that has brought fast and meaningful improvements in patients' vision. It sounds like in the not-too-distant future, blindness could be curable. But while we pour all our attention on the eye treatment, we neglect the fact that other organs could help "see" too - like the tongue.

BrainPortFullSystem.JPG
With densely packed tactile nerve endings, the tongue seems the ideal organ for the task. A device which uses the tongue to stimulate the blind person's visual cortex and let him/her identify light and shapes was developed by neuroscientists from Wicab, Inc. Called BrainPort, the device consists of a lollipop-like electrode array worn on the tongue, a miniature camera mounted on a pair of sunglasses, and a hand-held controller about the size of a cell phone. It works by converting images taken from the camera to electrical impulses that can be felt by the blind person's tongue, and then the signals go from the tongue to the brain.
BrainPortTongueArray.jpg
 It's a little bit like Braille, in which bumps felt by fingers are translated into words that the brain can "read." BrainPort allows electricity on the tongue to be interpreted as images by the brain. This technology is called sensory substitution.

The BrainPort is especially good at helping blind people navigate in a real environment. The guy in the video below even does rock climbing with it - how awesome is that? The best thing about the BrainPort is that it's noninvasive, unlike an implant. The device will be ready for sale by the end of this year.


Images courtesy of Wicab, Inc.

Stuff! It's all around us. The metals, plastics, glass, fibers and other materials that make up our homes, our cars, our electronics, our everything! Most of the time we accept this stuff for what it is and don't give it another thought. But not David Pogue. 


David is a New York Times personal technology columnist and CBS news correspondent who wants to know, just what is all of our stuff made of? How strong can materials get? On how small of a scale can we work with them? How clean can we get our technology? And how smart can a material become? From the first man to craft a tool using a rock, to the future of robots so small they'll navigate your blood stream, we'll be following David as he searches for the stories behind the materials that make up our world in this four-part program set to air in the fall of 2010. 


I'm Dan Parsons, a production assistant on the Stuff crew. So far in production we've locked down the treatment for one of the four episodes, titled "Strong, Stronger, Strongest" and should have the second, "Small Smaller Smallest" complete soon. We've lined up some interesting adventures for our host including trips to a demolition derby, an active Navy aircraft carrier, a steel mill, a diamond cutter and to MIT for a slow-motion look at exactly how things break. There's still a long road ahead of us, so keep checking back as production continues for an inside look behind the production of Stuff!

user-pic

LCROSS's Successful Smashing

Last week NASA announced the preliminary results of the moon smashing LCROSS mission that NOVA scienceNOW covered this past summer, and now it's official. There is definitely water on the moon.

ACD06-0232-014.jpg
(Image courtesy Northrup Grumman/NASA)

When we last left LCROSS, in July, the spacecraft was speeding along its slingshot trajectory toward the moon. On October 8th, about 10 hours before impact, the satellite released Centaur--the white, cylindrical rocket stage in the image above--and nudged it into a collision course with the well of a crater on the moon's surface. The rest of the spacecraft followed about 10 minutes behind Centaur, ready to start taking data as soon as the initial collision kicked up enough dust to analyze.

The crash was less dramatic than hoped. Scientists originally predicted that the headlong impact could send plumes of material shooting up to 10 kilometers above the surface--a reaction that would be visible to telescopes across the country. But, perhaps because of the spongy nature of the moon's surface, the dust didn't spray much further than a single kilometer high. At first, the mainstream media deemed the mission a flop.

But in the months following that impact, NASA scientists sifted through the data and found that the plume, though smaller than anticipated, was hardly a disappointment. The results released last week show that plume contained at least 26 gallons of water.  (None of that was water in the liquid form we're used to, since the lack of atmosphere on the moon causes solid ice to sublime directly into a gas.)

What does this mean? For one thing, the moon may be more viable as a way station in space than previously thought. If we can harvest and use the moon's water, either to sustain humans in space, or as the raw material for making hydrogen fuel, we might be able to use the moon as our stopping place and leapfrog on to other planets.

But, as our friend from Reading Rainbow used to say, you don't have to take my word for it.

Check out this podcast, in which David Levin talks to David Morrison of NASA's Lunar Science Institute and asks him to explain why we should bother going back to the moon.

Still not psyched about the new discovery?
Hit play to hear "Water on the Moon," a song composed (and performed in part) by LCROSS deputy project manager John Marmie.

We've spent the past--okay, I can't recall how long we've been dreaming of and chipping away at this project. Let's just say forever--working to bring you a new, redesigned, version of one section of our website, and it finally launched at the end of October.

Because our beta is meant to compliment the fall season of programming on evolution, it includes all kinds of content that touches the topic. So I've been knee deep in natural selection and developmental biology for all that time.  Still am, to be sure, as we continue to migrate more of our content to the new site and the new format. 

Some time ago, I ran across this:

Few things delight me more than adorable portrayals of the history of science.  This is the "Botanical Version" of the song.  The original version, below, tells more of Darwin's story (and skips over naming quite so many plants.)
Worried about warming but confused about carbon? Try University of Chicago geophysicist David Archer's The Long Thaw, which tells you nearly everything you need to know with down-to-earth clarity and brevity. Archer is known for his studies of "the long tail" - the lifetime of CO2 released by human activities - which he and his colleagues have shown will continue to heat up the planet for thousands of years to come. He calls it "a climate storm" with an impact that will "last longer than Stonehenge." Yet reading The Long Thaw is sobering and enlightening rather than depressing. It's packed with informative, accessible background on past climate cycles and why they are relevant to assessing today's warming. Ultimately, Archer argues, the fate of our climate depends on what we do with earth's vast coal reserves. If we burn all that coal, it has the potential to take us to a hothouse world last seen not long after the demise of the dinosaurs. Yet Archer doesn't preach or waste much space on climate skeptics. His clear-eyed epilog settles quietly on the issue of ethics. Solutions to warming will only work if the nations that have benefited most from fossil fuels take on most of the burden of fixing the problem. The Long Thaw is published by Princeton University Press (2009, $22.95).
user-pic

What your eyes know

Meet NOVA intern Bo Zhang, a graduate student in Boston University's science journalism story. In her first Inside NOVA post, Bo describes an electronic contact lens that can read your cholesterol level, blood sugar, and more--all from your eyeball. You can read more from Bo at Free Radicals, a brand new web magazine from the BU science journalism program. I'll hand the microphone over to Bo:

eye1.jpg
Ever imagined reading your body temperature from contacts? It seems like this contact lens with built-in LEDs will beat out any fancy colored competitors.

Scientists from the University of Washington have been developing a digital contact lens that has miniature antennas, control circuits, and an LED integrated in it, aiming at in-eye health monitoring, since 2004. Because scientists have found the surface of the eye contains a surprising amount data about our body, including cholesterol and blood glucose level, the lens is a non-invasive way to get real-time health data.

Part of a new kind of technology called augmented reality (AR), or a combination of physical real world and a virtual computer-generated imagery, the lens sounds exciting - as neat as something you would read from a sci-fi - but also terrifying. What would a person wearing such contacts look like? Is it safe to have a device with circuits touching your eyeballs? Although live rabbits have been tested wearing these contacts for 20 minutes at a time and without being hurt, we still have to be patient to wait until more promising results to be revealed.

For more on the contact lens, visit the Wired Gadget Lab.

Image courtesy of the University of Washington.
I just found out that President Obama is speaking at MIT (just a hop, skip and jump across the river from our offices) about clean energy research and to promote Senator Kerry (D-Mass.) and Senator Boxer's (D- Calif.) energy bill.  You can watch online here.  Or it's on live on the White House's channel on Fri. Oct. 23 at around 12:30 pm EST here.  Obama is only the second sitting president to visit MIT (Bill Clinton was the first in 1998, when he gave the commencement speech). 

user-pic

All's fair in love and spiders

Gentlemen, please take a moment to be thankful that you are not an Australian redback spider.

Just one in five bachelor redbacks ever finds a lady redback to call his own. If he's lucky enough to get that far, just as his search comes to an end and mating begins, she eats him. Alive. While they are mating. NOVA scienceNOW covered this gruesome seduction, and explained its evolutionary utility, in a profile of University of Toronto evolutionary biologist Maydianne Andrade. After all, if you only get to mate once, you had better be sure the mother of your spider babies isn't going to go hungry.

Now, Andrade and her colleagues have uncovered a fiendish new detail in this strange romance. To earn the right to be devoured, the male redback has to perform a prolonged (100 minutes, minimum) courtship ritual. If his wooing isn't up to snuff, his would-be partner will eat him (are you sensing a theme here?) without mating and move on to the next suitor. 

The worst news of all for an upstanding male redback is that a nasty "sneaker" male who wants to skip the courtship rigamarole will sometimes shadow a stronger suitor, wait for him finish his romancing, then slip in and take the lady redback for himself. Kind of like Cyrano de Bergerac, but with spiders. And cannibalism.

Yet more proof that good guys never win--but at least they might not get eaten.

The folks at Nature have this all on video.

older posts newer posts

Picture of the week

Inside NOVA takes you behind the scenes of public television’s most-watched science series. You'll hear from our producers, researchers, and other contributors. It's a forum where you can see what's on our minds and tell us what's on yours.

Follow NOVA's Twitter Feed

    Recent Posts

    Recent Comments

    • Megan Daniels on Stuff! A Look Behind the Scenes.
      Any reason you're using "material science" rather than "materials science?" Expected air dates? Can't wait to share this with our students. M. Daniels Advisor Materials Science and Engineering The Ohio State University
    • Edward Warren on First images from new and improved Hubble
      Why does it take a PBS production to bring this great achievement to my attention? In an atmosphere of gloom and doom this refreshing good news the should be shouted from the top of every TV tower. An excellent follow up series is HBO's "From the Earth to the Moon" Of the 12 one hour episodes my two favorite are the "Spider" and "Gallileo was right". This series is available on Netflix.
    • Dan Kennedy on Biting Evidence
      Great item.
    • Terrified of GM Hubris on A Little CSI Work of My Own On CSI Miami
      Dr. X - Thanks for your reply. My post is very clear and *exactly* addresses the source material (by quoted section). I'm not surprised the only thing you could find to complain about was the minor point you raised (illustrating your apparent lack of comprehension and inability to synthesize). Yes - Gaia said they know what genes go in, where her conclusion was that "...there's no way a gene for a deadly toxin would 'accidentally' get into a crop." Well...per the real-world evidence, that seems to be *exactly* what happens with GM crops. Genes coding for toxic substances or other designer functions "accidentally" end up in unexpected places with unknown/untested impact and very wide distribution. Subsequently, corporations even use this "accidental" cross-pollination to assert their patent rights against traditional seed-saving farmers not specifically using their products. The goal of corporations is to force the farmers to capitulate and use their GM seed. As in my post, one aspect of the gross hubris of Big Biotech is that they think they can create GM crops (yes - with known sequences) that will not experience any random mutation or interaction among themselves or with related species in the wild (not to mention the other very clear points I raise in direct response to Gaia's blog). Her blog and your comments are both in the same categories - poorly conceived and apparently uninformed. So...try to find meaningful evidence-based arguments to support your critique of the issue and/or my very clear commentary, if you can and are so inclined. Thanks.

    Corporate funding provided by