Stuff! It's all around us. The metals, plastics, glass, fibers and other materials that make up our homes, our cars, our electronics, our everything! Most of the time we accept this stuff for what it is and don't give it another thought. But not David Pogue.
David is a New York Times personal technology columnist and CBS news correspondent who wants to know, just what is all of our stuff made of? How strong can materials get? On how small of a scale can we work with them? How clean can we get our technology? And how smart can a material become? From the first man to craft a tool using a rock, to the future of robots so small they'll navigate your blood stream, we'll be following David as he searches for the stories behind the materials that make up our world in this four-part program set to air in the fall of 2010.
I'm Dan Parsons, a production assistant on the Stuff crew. So far in production we've locked down the treatment for one of the four episodes, titled "Strong, Stronger, Strongest" and should have the second, "Small Smaller Smallest" complete soon. We've lined up some interesting adventures for our host including trips to a demolition derby, an active Navy aircraft carrier, a steel mill, a diamond cutter and to MIT for a slow-motion look at exactly how things break. There's still a long road ahead of us, so keep checking back as production continues for an inside look behind the production of Stuff!






Recent Comments
Why does it take a PBS production to bring this great achievement to my attention? In an atmosphere of gloom and doom this refreshing good news the should be shouted from the top of every TV tower. An excellent follow up series is HBO's "From the Earth to the Moon" Of the 12 one hour episodes my two favorite are the "Spider" and "Gallileo was right". This series is available on Netflix.
Great item.
Dr. X - Thanks for your reply. My post is very clear and *exactly* addresses the source material (by quoted section). I'm not surprised the only thing you could find to complain about was the minor point you raised (illustrating your apparent lack of comprehension and inability to synthesize). Yes - Gaia said they know what genes go in, where her conclusion was that "...there's no way a gene for a deadly toxin would 'accidentally' get into a crop." Well...per the real-world evidence, that seems to be *exactly* what happens with GM crops. Genes coding for toxic substances or other designer functions "accidentally" end up in unexpected places with unknown/untested impact and very wide distribution. Subsequently, corporations even use this "accidental" cross-pollination to assert their patent rights against traditional seed-saving farmers not specifically using their products. The goal of corporations is to force the farmers to capitulate and use their GM seed. As in my post, one aspect of the gross hubris of Big Biotech is that they think they can create GM crops (yes - with known sequences) that will not experience any random mutation or interaction among themselves or with related species in the wild (not to mention the other very clear points I raise in direct response to Gaia's blog). Her blog and your comments are both in the same categories - poorly conceived and apparently uninformed. So...try to find meaningful evidence-based arguments to support your critique of the issue and/or my very clear commentary, if you can and are so inclined. Thanks.
Gaia, Nice write up on the science, but I think you're missing the *storyline*. Sure, no major corporation should/would plant potentially toxic food, but the company on the show knew the risks after testing and planted the crop anyway - that's the "crime", hence the involvement of Horatio's team. Actually, to be fair, the storyline gets a little philosophical... the testing showed a minute (I forgot the %) risk of toxic food resulting from the crop. The company maintains this is worth the value of feeding so many so inexpensively. Horatio thinks nothing more than 0% risk is tolerable. The story ends with the case going to civil court to decide.