"Dimming the Sun" investigates the discovery that the sunlight
reaching Earth has been growing dimmer, which may seem surprising
given all the international concern over global warming. At first
glance, less sunlight might hardly seem to matter when our planet is
stewing in greenhouse gases. But the discovery of global dimming has
led several scientists to revise their models of the climate and how
fast it's changing. According to one recent and highly controversial
model, the worst-case warming scenario could be worse than anyone
has predicted. "Dimming the Sun" unravels this baffling climate
conundrum and the implications for Earth's future.
To find out what global dimming means for the fate of the planet,
NOVA reports on the findings of the world's top climate detectives,
including an American scientist who found a grim but crucial
opportunity immediately following September 11, 2001, when the
entire U.S. airline fleet was grounded for three days. This
presented a unique opportunity to study the effects of airplane
vapor trails on the atmosphere (see
The Contrail Effect).
Comparing changes in the daily temperature range showed that the
absence of dimming from aircraft pollution alone made a marked
difference to the temperature. This result hints at how much the
effects of atmospheric pollution had been underestimated.
Working in Israel, Dr. Gerald Stanhill was one of the first to
discover the surprising fact that less solar energy is reaching the
Earth's surface. While his measurements were met with skepticism, a
review of worldwide data by Stanhill and a German researcher
demonstrated that during the 1980s and early '90s, sunlight reaching
Earth's surface had dropped just about everywhere. Halfway around
the world, independent studies by Australian scientists confirmed
this disturbing diagnosis. (For more, see
Discoveries in Global Dimming.)
Scientists have long known that increasing air pollution—the
smog that clouds urban skies—endangers our respiratory health.
But they had underestimated the impact of pollution on the amount of
sunlight reaching Earth. Some scientists now believe that global
dimming may also disturb rainfall patterns such as the Asian
monsoon. If they are right, global dimming may be one of many
factors that contributed to severe droughts and famines in Africa
during the 1980s.
The good news is that pollution controls have slowed and possibly
even halted global dimming during the last decade. The bad
news—and the ironic twist in NOVA's story—is that
without pollution, more sunlight is reaching Earth, revealing the
full impact of global warming. Although all climate models have
important uncertainties, the unsettling implication is that, with
dimming fading away in many regions, global temperatures may rise
even faster than most models have predicted.
|
Is global dimming masking the full impact of global
warming? Some climate experts worry that it is, with the
possible consequence that as we reduce pollution, the
climate will heat up to unprecedented levels.
|
|
|