|
Vanished!
|
|
Classroom Activity
|
Objective
To trace the development of how a hypothesis changes based on new
evidence.
-
copy of "What Happened to Stardust?" student handout (PDF
or
HTML)
-
As part of the scientific investigation of the
Stardust crash site, scientists proposed possible
theories and made a list of specific wreckage that would confirm
or refute their theories. Sometimes the wreckage presented
another question to be answered. In this activity, students will
follow the process scientists went through.
-
Distribute copies of the "What Happened to Stardust?"
student handout. While they watch the program, have students
fill in the information about each piece of evidence (i.e.,
where it was found, the condition in which it was found) and
possible conclusions. Direct students to look only for the
information that deals with what happened to the plane, not
about why it crashed, which is presented in the latter part of
the program.
-
After students have watched the program, as a class review the
information they collected, as well as any additional evidence
students saw presented. Have students answer the questions about
the fate of Stardust. After reviewing conclusions about
what happened to Stardust, clear up any remaining
questions students may have.
-
As an extension, have students research current unsolved plane
crashes. How many are there? Have students note the first
hypotheses that surface immediately after a plane crash. How do
any final conclusions differ from initial ideas regarding the
crash? How certain are investigators about their conclusions?
What questions remain?
Investigators working to unravel the mystery of what happened to the
Stardust flight began their investigation with one idea of
what may have happened and then modified their hypothesis as they
discovered new evidence.
After examining all the wreckage, investigators concluded that the
plane flew into the mountainside—the wreckage was spread too
far for a nose dive into the ground, but not far enough for a bomb.
But one question remained: Why was the wreckage so far from the
mountain where the plane was thought to crash?
This inconsistency in the evidence generated a new theory: The
glacier below the mountain may have transported the wreckage from
close to the mountain where the plane crashed to a new position
farther away. And if the wreckage had been carried inside the
glacier this would explain why it was hidden for 53 years.
Once they had solved the mystery of what happened to the plane,
investigators were still left with the question of why it occurred.
After looking at the available evidence, they concluded that severe
headwinds had a devastating impact on Stardust's progress,
unknown to the crew, which kept it from travelling all the way
across the mountains before it began to turn south toward Mount
Tupangato. Thinking they were near their destination, crew members
may have begun the plane's descent too early, sending the plane into
the mountain.
The following is a sampling of some of the evidence and additional
information about the Stardust disappearance. Students may
generate additional ideas.
Evidence
|
Additional Information
|
Rolls Royce engine
|
found on glacier below Mount Tupangato
|
first pieces of wreckage
|
found more than 0.62 miles (1 kilometer) from mountain
|
two main wheels |
found farther down the mountain from wreckage
brake is engaged
|
various wreckage |
found scattered, but contained within a kilometer or so
|
human remains |
brutally torn |
tail landing gear, minus its wheel
|
found 547 yards (500 meters) or more away from main wheels
|
propeller |
propeller's blades turned back; propeller not feathered
|
Organization
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
490 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20594
(202) 314-6000
The independent Federal agency that investigates every U.S. civil
aviation accident. The NTSB's investigative process is detailed
online at: www.ntsb.gov/abt_ntsb/invest.htm, and updates on major
investigations and statistics on aviation accidents are online at:
http://www.ntsb.gov/aviation/aviation.htm
Book
Post, Austin, and Edward R. Lachapelle. Glacier Ice. Seattle,
WA: University of Washington Press, May 2000.
Combines more than 100 photographs with a discussion of the effects
of glaciers on the landscape, glacier formation and mass balance,
flow and fluctuations, and surface details. Includes ground-based
photographs from South American ranges.
Web Sites
NOVA Online—Vanished!
http://www.pbs.org/nova/vanished/
Provides program-related articles, interviews, interactive
activities, resources, and more.
Forensic Science Links
http://www.cj.msu.edu/~academic/forenlinks.html
Provides links to many branches of forensic science, including those
that play a role in plane crash investigations.
All about Glaciers
http://nsidc.colorado.edu/glaciers/
Includes facts, historic photos, an extensive glossary, and other
links to glacier information. The Glacier Story page offers a quick
tour through the life of a glacier.
The "What Happened to Stardust?" activity aligns with the
following National Science Education Standards:
Grades 5-8
|
Science Standard G: History and Nature of Science
|
|
Nature of Science
-
It is part of scientific inquiry to evaluate the results of
scientific investigations, experiments, observations,
theoretical models, and the explanations proposed by other
scientists. Evaluation includes reviewing the experimental
procedures, examining the evidence, identifying faulty
reasoning, pointing out statements that go beyond the evidence,
and suggesting alternative explanations for the same
observations.
Grades 9-12
|
Science Standard G: History and Nature of Science
|
|
Nature of Scientific Knowledge
-
Scientific explanations must meet certain criteria. First and
foremost, they must be consistent with experimental and
observational evidence about nature and must make accurate
predictions, when appropriate, about the systems being studied.
They should also be logical, respect the rules of evidence, be
open to criticism, report methods and procedures, and make
knowledge public.
|
|