Daily VideoMay 28, 2020
Social media’s role in monitoring misinformation
Directions: Read the news summary, watch the video and answer the discussion questions. The video has been edited for length. To watch the video in its entirety or read the transcript, click here.
Summary: President Donald Trump’s messages to his more than 80 million Twitter followers can carry a lot of weight—but don’t always represent the truth. A new initiative by Twitter to fact check the tweets of influential figures such as President Trump has stirred debate over the role of social media platforms as content moderators.
- For the first time this week, Twitter has applied a note to one of Trump’s tweets offering a fact check of his claims. Trump has since vowed consequences for Twitter’s new policy.
- Meanwhile, the president continues to use social media to suggest without evidence that a media figure (who is often critical of the president) may have been connected to the murder of a former employee.
- The former fiance of the woman who passed away has written a letter to Twitter saying that Trump’s tweets are misinformation. The letter asks Twitter to delete the president’s accusatory tweets. Twitter has decided not to delete them.
- Essential question: Should social media platforms seek to correct, delete or otherwise discourage misinformation? If so, how? If not, why not?
- Do you think Twitter should honor the request in the letter mentioned in this video and delete Trump’s tweets that the letter-writer says contain falsehoods? Why do you think Twitter has decided to not honor the request?
- Why might a politician such as Trump continue to make claims that are without evidence or known to be false? Do you think social media platforms like Twitter should do more or less to moderate claims by world leaders than other users? Explain.
- Media literacy: BuzzFeed News Media Editor Craig Silverman describes Trump’s strategy as one of “hacking the media” for attention by making evidence-free claims. How does “hacking the media” work? In your opinion, how should news sources cover false or evidence-free claims by influential figures?
If there is time: Have students read the follow-up article about Trump’s accusations that Twitter is “interfering in the 2020 election” and his threats to “strongly regulate” or “close down” Twitter. Discuss with your students the role of the First Amendment in limiting the president’s ability to regulate a social media company such as Twitter. Then discuss the following questions:
- Should the government have the power to regulate what content a platform like Twitter allows to be posted by its users? Explain.
- The First Amendment only applies to government actions. But do you think platforms like Twitter should abide by the “spirit” of free speech as some argue and avoid deleting or moderating users’ posts? Why or why not?
For monthly updates containing teacher resources on Election 2020, click here. Sign up for short education highlights from the PBS NewsHour here.
If you are making plans for distance learning, take a look at our list of PBS resources that covers a variety of subjects for middle and high school students.
Tooltip of related stories
Tooltip of more video block
Submit Your Student Voice
What message did each candidate need to get across, and were they successful? Continue reading
As election season turns up the dial on online misinformation, how can students determine truth from fiction? Continue reading
Learn how voters respond to politicians playing up threats and fears Continue reading
Explore why swing states become the center of attention for presidential candidates and how the Electoral College system works Continue reading
Learn what happened this week, including what’s happening in an unprecedented presidential race Continue reading