To zero in on something that small, astronomers would need to use another source of energy. One option might involve trying to detect the gamma rays emitted by the halo of dark matter that likely shrouds this primordial black hole.

Unwin and Scholtz’s paper hasn’t been published in a peer-reviewed journal yet, and it neither proves nor disproves anything about Planet Nine’s true form. But their proposition isn’t entirely implausible, Konstantin Batygin, an astrophysicist and Planet Nine hunter at Caltech who wasn’t involved in the study, told Mandelbaum. If planet-focused surveys of the sky keep coming back empty-handed, he said, a primordial black hole could be an interesting alternative to pursue.

“The most mundane, or maybe the most sane explanation is that it’s a planet,” Scholtz told Letzter. But “it doesn’t need to be a planet.”

It’s also still possible that neither theory will pan out—and researchers will find that there’s no Planet Nine at all. Nathan Kaib, an astronomer at the University of Oklahoma, contends that there would be more detectable anomalies in the outer solar system if something that massive were actually barreling through it, Letzter reports.

But the search is worth continuing, Unwin and Scholtz argue in their paper—especially given how big the payoff could be. It’s at least worth keeping an open mind.

Receive emails about upcoming NOVA programs and related content, as well as featured reporting about current events through a science lens.

Share this article