|
|
|
Dennis Stanford
|
Claims for the Remains
Dennis Stanford
Chairman, Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian
Institution
It is my view that many roads lead toward knowledge, and the
unexpected is often encountered along the journey. Discovery
of the remains of a man who lived along the Columbia River
9,000 years ago was itself a surprise. A further wonder is the
marvelous story this individual can tell about life in
prehistoric America. Should this elder be silenced because
people in modern times presumed they already understood all he
could teach?
The process by which the Americas were peopled, initially and
through time, is a multifaceted story with many chapters. Much
of this narrative is not well understood. No particular
group—be it governmental, ethnic, or
scientific—can respectfully claim that their path to
understanding this story is paramount. Should a single
interpretation or understanding of the course of events
thousands of years ago become the accepted truth for all
concerned? Such issues were at stake when we challenged the
decision by the Army Corps of Engineers to rebury the
Kennewick individual without study.
Reburial without scientific study and verification by
interdisciplinary researchers would deny present and future
generations the opportunity to learn and to benefit from
significant new information. Preliminary studies indicate that
Kennewick Man may tell a different story about the origins and
lifestyles of early peoples in North America than that written
in textbooks. He may illuminate a past more rich and complex
than currently imagined.
Kennewick Man, a cast of whose skull appears here,
has the potential to force anthropologists to revise
textbooks on the early peopling of North America,
Stanford says.
|
|
Although publicity by the popular press has often cast the
Kennewick case as an adversarial conflict between scientists
and Native Americans, there are precedents whereby the
religious concerns of Native groups and the respectful study
of prehistoric peoples by anthropologists have proceeded in a
cooperative, collaborative manner. Researchers of many ethnic
backgrounds, having special expertise in unraveling
biological, genetic, linguistic, and archeological clues
regarding prehistoric populations and technological advances,
are providing researchers with unprecedented tools for
learning about the past. Likewise, American Indian religious
systems, oral traditions, and culturally based understanding
can be brought to bear in interpretations of archeological
remains that are older than the experience of any living
person. By respectfully combining both approaches to
knowledge, we will be able to gain greater insights regarding
the significance of the Kennewick find.
Does Race Exist? |
Meet Kennewick Man
Claims for the Remains
|
The Dating Game
| Resources
Transcript
| Site Map |
Mystery of the First Americans Home
Editor's Picks
|
Previous Sites
|
Join Us/E-mail
|
TV/Web Schedule
About NOVA |
Teachers |
Site Map |
Shop |
Jobs |
Search |
To print
PBS Online |
NOVA Online |
WGBH
©
| Updated November 2000
|
|
|