|
|
|
Rudolf Brandt, an SS officer and aide to Himmler, was
found guilty of a host of war crimes, including
conducting medical experimentation and killing
tuberculosis-infected people. Sentenced to death, he
was hanged on June 2, 1948.
|
What if you knew that many feel that using the data would
make us the Nazi experimenters' moral accessories?
Many hold that making use of the data wrenched so brutally
from helpless victims would not only validate the Nazi
doctors' unthinkable acts, but also make us the victims'
"retrospective torturers" (attorney Baruch Cohen) and them our
"retrospective guinea pigs" (Dr. Harold M. Spiro, Department
of Internal Medicine, Yale University). [13 & 14] Indeed,
Lord Immanuel Jakobovits, Chief Rabbi of the British
Commonwealth of Nations and an expert in Jewish medical
ethics, felt use would only serve to further dishonor the
victims [15], while the late Harvard Medical School professor
Dr. Henry Beecher believed publishing unethically obtained
medical data would cause a "far-reaching moral loss to
medicine." [16]
"The idea behind the negative reaction now is that the Nazis
were criminals; we are decent. That's not true. What we've
done is not as evil, but it's in the ballpark."
—Dr. Arthur Caplan, bioethicist now at the
University of Pennsylvania, commenting about uproar
surrounding physiologist Robert Pozos' proposed use of
Nazi data on hypothermia [17]
"The conduct of Nazi physician-scientists was barbarous,
revolting, monstrous, devoid of any decency. Their research
defiled human beings, medicine, science, and humanity. They
dragged through bloody mud an honorable profession to which
contemporary physician-scientists who now wish to make use
of these results belong."
—Jay Katz, M.D., Yale University School of Law
[18]
"Today some doctors want to use the only thing left by these
victims. They are like vultures waiting for the corpses to
cool so they could devour every consummable part. To use the
Nazi data is obscene and sick. One can always rationalize
that it would save human lives; the question should be
asked, at what cost?"
—Eva Mozes Kor, survivor of Dr. Josef Mengele's
twins experiments
at Auschwitz [19]
"We must not add our numbers to the multitudes of onlookers
who slept peacefully through the nights of anguished cries
while dreaming their sweet dreams of a better tomorrow."
—Dr. Willard Gaylin, psychiatrist and former
president of The Hastings Center, a biomedical ethics
thinktank [20]
Yes
|
No
References
13.
Cohen, p. 27.
14. Spiro, Howard M., M.D. "Let Nazi
Medical Data Remind Us of Evil" (Letter to the Editor).
The New York Times 4/19/88, p. 30.
15.
Cohen, p. 30.
16. Beecher, Henry K. "Ethics and
Clinical Research."
The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 274 No. 24,
6/16/66, p. 1360.
17.
Siegel, p. 1.
18. Katz, Jay. "Abuse of Human Beings
for the Sake of Science." In
Caplan, p. 265.
19. Kor, Eva Mozes. "Nazi Experiments as
Viewed by a Survivor of Mengele's Experiments." In
Caplan, p. 7.
20. Gaylin, Willard. "Commentary"
(responding to "Nazi Data: Dissociation from Evil").
Hastings Center Report,
Vol. 19, July/August 1989, p. 18.
Photo: Hedy Epstein, courtesy of USHMM Photo Archives
The Director's Story
|
Timeline of Nazi Abuses
Results of Death-Camp Experiments: Should They Be Used?
Exposing Flawed Science
|
Resources
Transcript
|
Site Map
|
Holocaust on Trial Home
Editor's Picks
|
Previous Sites
|
Join Us/E-mail
|
TV/Web Schedule
About NOVA |
Teachers |
Site Map |
Shop |
Jobs |
Search |
To print
PBS Online |
NOVA Online |
WGBH
©
| Updated October 2000
|
|
|