|

|

|
|
The Gold Rush steamer Brother Jonathan
|
Who Owns Lost Ships?
Part 3 |
Back to Part 2
"The Abandoned Shipwreck Act is a paper tiger now," says Peter
Hess, an admiralty attorney in Wilmington, Delaware who
specializes in litigation involving historic shipwrecks and
aircraft salvage. "As found with the
Brother Jonathan, the law has no teeth, because a
sovereign state that does not have possession of a shipwreck
site—in a national park, say—does not have the
power to preclude a salvor from doing recovery. The Supreme
Court made that clear."
Sovereign immunity, which precludes jurisdiction over publicly
owned property by individuals or other countries, may still
apply to federal if not state governments. The U.S. Navy, for
instance, claims ownership of the Confederate warship CSS
Alabama, which sunk off the coast of France in 1864,
and even went so far as to appropriate without compensation a
bronze bell from the ship that a New Jersey antiques dealer
had purchased years ago from an English dealer. In December
1998, the Spanish government asked a U.S. federal judge to
revoke a salvor's rights to salvage the remains of two
centuries-old Spanish warships, the La Galga and the
Juno, which went down off the coast of Virginia in 1750
and 1802, respectively. And, of course, France maintains that
it owns La Belle.
A controversial treaty
While these cases are still under litigation, countries that
claim lost ships may soon get major support from an
international treaty now being drafted at the United Nations
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
The treaty would charge governments with responsibility for
jurisdiction and management protection of any non-military
ships that are found within 200 miles of their shores and are
more than a century old. So, under the treaty, if a sunken
Spanish merchant ship were found within 200 miles of New York
City, for example, the U.S. would notify Spain to determine
their interest in the site. If they had an interest, the two
nations would sign a cooperative agreement about managing and
protecting the site. If they evinced no interest, the U.S.
would still be charged with protecting the site, even if
archeologists had no immediate plans to excavate it.
The Confederate warship CSS Alabama
|
|
"The treaty leaves no room for private-sector recovery, even
for ships like Titanic that lie beyond the 200-mile
limit," says Hess, who has been a wreck diver for 22 years.
"UNESCO realizes that there's no legal grounding for nations
to lay claim to such wrecks, so they say that salvors can
recover them and their artifacts but not land with them. So
one can have, for instance, a Titanic museum, as long
as it stays at sea!" With such restrictions, Hess notes, the
new treaty would provide an enormous disincentive for salvors
to report finds. Rather, he says, it will encourage a
"rape-and-escape" attitude.
Hess believes there is room for compromise. He cites the
finding of the SS Carolina, a passenger steamship sunk
by a German U-boat in World War I off the coast of New Jersey.
The finder, Hess says, has strived to record everything and
make results accessible to the public, including setting up an
SS Carolina "virtual museum" on the Web, with
historical articles, photographs, and contemporary newspaper
articles. "It's the wave of the future," he says, "because we
can have information on a wreck site on one repository
accessible by anyone, rather than housed in a museum archive
that only Ph.D.'s are likely to visit."
Carrell feels differently. "The UNESCO treaty is the best
chance we have on a worldwide basis to ensure appropriate use
for what they call 'underwater cultural heritage,'" she says.
"The purpose is not to put private industry out of business
but to provide a baseline level of protection and
documentation for cultural resources. This type of protection
is generally enforced worldwide on land sites. The treaty
would simply extend that ethic to the seafloor and underwater
cultural heritage."
|
The passenger liner Titanic
|
The UNESCO agreement would also prohibit the sale of
artifacts, Carrell says, removing the urgency to excavate a
wreck for a quick return. However, it would not prohibit the
sale of replica artifacts or the production of books, movies,
or traveling exhibits. "These are perfectly acceptable means
of generating 'profit' for investors," Carrell says. "The
better the archeology, the better the movie or exhibit, so
both groups have the same goal: the search for knowledge."
Of course, the treaty would give France ownership of
La Belle, which Carrell helped to excavate for the
Texas Historical Commission (see
Stories in the Timber). While she admits to a feeling of being pulled in two
directions, Carrell says that current negotiations between
Texas and France simply would have started sooner rather than
later, with the desired result being, she says, "an enhanced
archeological and public outcome."
Until such time as the treaty comes into effect, however,
interested parties must solve their own problems, as Texas and
France are now doing. Larry Oaks sums up the THC's position:
"The Counsel General of France verbally said that France is
not interested in retrieving the resource but only wants to be
involved in conservation, exhibits, and loaning. We want to
work toward an amicable solution but are unwilling to accept
their position without lawyers in maritime law to determine
our real interest as far as Texas is concerned." Alas, even
among the least disputatious parties, the battle for who owns
lost ships wages on.
Peter Tyson is Online Producer of NOVA.
Photos: (1) Courtesy of Corpus Christi
Caller-Times; (3) Corbis/David Lees; (4) Peabody
Essex Museum; (5) Courtesy of the Zwaanendael Museum; (6)
Collection of the Milwaukee Public Library/Wisconsin Marine
Historical Society; (7) Courtesy of San Francisco Maritime
NHP, Doris Chase Collection and the California State Lands
Commission; (8) Courtesy of William Stanley Hoole Special
Collections Library, The University of Alabama; (9) courtesy
of Harland and Wolff.
Stories in the Timber
|
Explore the Shipwreck
|
Who Owns Lost Ships?
Buoyancy Brainteasers
|
Teacher's Guide
| Resources |
Transcript
| Site Map
Voyage of Doom Home
Editor's Picks
|
Previous Sites
|
Join Us/E-mail
|
TV/Web Schedule
About NOVA |
Teachers |
Site Map |
Shop |
Jobs |
Search |
To print
PBS Online |
NOVA Online |
WGBH
©
| Updated November 2000
|
|
|