|
Spies That Fly
|
|
Classroom Activity
|
Objective
To understand some of the challenges associated with building
extremely small aircraft.
-
copy of "Small, Smaller, Smallest" student handout (
HTML)
-
copy of "Aircraft Templates" student handout (copied on 20-pound
copier paper, 8.5-by-11 inches) (
HTML)
- large paper clip
- small paper clip
- stapler
- stopwatch
-
Tell students they are going to be downsizing an aircraft with a
goal of making it as small as possible while still allowing it
to fly.
-
Organize students into groups of at least three students and
provide each group with a copy of the "Small, Smaller, Smallest"
and "Aircraft Templates" student handout, the stopwatch, the
paperclips, and the stapler. Set up testing areas (classroom
corners are relatively free from crosscurrents). Place a stable
chair in each site for students to stand on for flight tests.
-
Have each group construct the first aircraft, using the largest
template on the page. Students should use the large paperclip to
weight the bottom.
-
Students should test their models by dropping them from at least
2.2 yards (2 meters) above the floor. Make sure that someone is
spotting the person on the chair for safety. Students should
hold the helicopter at the top arm's length away and make the
drops as consistent as possible.
-
Have the students drop each aircraft five times and find the
average rate of descent (distance divided by time) for each
different-sized aircraft. Have students record the time each
flight takes in the chart on their student handouts.
-
Have students repeat the test with the two smaller aircraft,
using the small paperclip for the medium-sized aircraft, and the
two staples for the smallest one.
-
After completing testing, have the groups report their findings
for the various-sized models. Have students compare the data
across groups for all of the same-sized models. Is there is a
wide variance of results from one group to another? If so, what
might explain these differences? What general conclusions can
students make regarding the effect(s) of scaling down a model?
-
As an extension, create an overhead transparency of the student
page grid. Project it on a piece of paper on the wall and have
students create an aircraft larger than their original design.
Then have them think of a suitable weight to use for the bottom,
and measure the rate of descent. How does the larger model
compare to the smaller ones?
Machines reach a limit of their function for two main reasons: size
and construction materials. The wings of today's aircraft are built
to be flexible. If they were not, wings would break under the
tremendous stresses of flying. Engineers focus on designing wings
that have the maximum strength given the wing area needed to lift
the airplane. In the students' models, the surface area/density
ratio of paper changes as smaller aircraft are constructed. Since
the density of the paper is constant, the aircraft becomes
relatively stiffer and less flexible as it is built smaller.
Here is a sample set of data for the activity:
|
Weight Used
|
Trial 1 (seconds)
|
Trial 2 (seconds)
|
Trial 3 (seconds)
|
Trial 4 (seconds)
|
Trial 5 (seconds)
|
Average Time(s)
|
Model 1 (100 percent)
|
large paperclip
|
1.63 |
1.34 |
1.56 |
1.57 |
1.47 |
1.51 |
Model 1 (100 percent)
|
none |
1.87 |
1.62 |
2.09 |
2.16 |
2.18 |
1.98 |
Model 2 (50 percent)
|
small paperclip
|
1.43 |
1.37 |
1.43 |
1.56 |
1.15 |
1.39 |
Model 3 (25 percent)
|
staple
|
1.16 |
1.28 |
1.34 |
1.41 |
1.47 |
1.33 |
The pull of gravity is constant on all bodies, regardless of their
mass. In the case of the students' models, surface area (and the
resulting wind resistance) is the key feature that acts to change
the performance of the aircraft as it is built to different
dimensions.
Book
Dudley, Robert.
The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Explains insect morphology, wing motion, aerodynamics, flight
energetics, and flight metabolism.
Articles
Dupont, D. "In Plane Sight." Scientific American, September,
20, 1999.
Discusses the role UAVs played in operations over Kosovo and the
advantages and disadvantages of flying without a pilot.
Glaskin, M. "Disc-shaped Spyplane Could Hunt for Terrorists."
www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991859
Features the small, disc-shaped SiMiCon Rotor Craft, which can take
off vertically, hover, and fly forward at high speed.
Kunzig, R. "The Physics of Insect Flight: What's the Buzz?"
Discover, April 2000.
Online at:
www.discover.com/issues/apr-00/departments/featphysics/
Reviews the evolution of insect flight and methods scientists use to
learn how insects fly.
Web Sites
CAMCOPTER® Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System
www.schiebel.net/pages/cam_intro.html
Describes a miniature spy plane that flies like a helicopter,
including the aircraft's maximum mission radius, tank volume, and
cruise speed.
RQ-1 Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
www.af.mil/news/factsheets/RQ_1_Predator_Unmanned_Aerial.html
Describes the background, features, and characteristics of the
Predator.
UAV Capabilities
uav.wff.nasa.gov/CapabilitiesChart.cfm
Provides a chart comparing UAVs in terms of payload weight,
endurance, and altitude capability.
The "Small, Smaller, Smallest" activity aligns with the following
National Science Education Standards.
Grades 5-8
|
Science Standard B: Physical Science
|
|
Motions and forces
-
The motion of an object can be described by its position,
direction of motion, and speed. That motion can be measured and
represented on a graph.
-
An object that is not being subjected to a force will continue
to move at a constant speed and in a straight line.
Grades 9-12
|
Science Standard B: Physical Science
|
|
Motions and Forces
|
Robofly
See in this Teachers' Domain
video segment
(4m 01s) how scientists are studying insect flight to gain
insight into ways of designing and developing miniature flying
vehicles.
|
|