|
The Spy Factory
|
|
Classroom Activity
|
Activity Summary
Students consider the tradeoffs between fortifying national security
and maintaining civil liberties.
Learning Objectives
Students will be able to:
Suggested Time
One class period
Background
While the issue of national security has been around since the
country was founded, the modern concept of this principle started
with the passage of the National Security Act of 1947. The act
created what would come to be known as the Department of Defense and
established the National Security Council and the Central
Intelligence Agency.
After the National Security Agency was caught spying domestically in
the early 1970s, Congress in 1978 passed the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act (FISA), which outlined procedures for requesting
judicial authorization for electronic surveillance of persons inside
the United States if they were involved in espionage or
international terrorism against the United States. The legislation
was later expanded to address physical searches, pen registers and
trap and trace devices, and access to certain business records. In
2001–2002, the Patriot Act, the Intelligence Authorization
Act, and the Homeland Security Act further changed FISA provisions.
In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, the NSA's General Michael
Hayden secretly bypassed FISA regulations. Hayden wiretapped and
otherwise monitored the personal and business communications of
millions of American citizens without first obtaining a warrant.
When his actions were uncovered in 2005, FISA was amended, making it
illegal to intentionally engage in electronic surveillance under the
appearance of an official act or to disclose or use information
obtained by electronic surveillance under appearance of an official
act. In addition, the Wiretap Act prohibits any person from
illegally intercepting, disclosing, using, or divulging phone calls
or electronic communications.
In times of heightened national security, governments often react by
tightening security measures. Sometimes, these measures can encroach
on civil liberties. This activity invites students to weigh the
costs and benefits of increased national security in regard to civil
liberties.
The Lesson
-
When societies are threatened, governing bodies often implement
additional security measures in order to protect their citizens.
Ask students if they can think of any times in which security
was heightened in the United States after a historical event.
What occurred during these times?
(Some examples include the internment of Japanese-Americans
living on the West Coast after the bombing of Pearl Harbor,
the investigations during the Cold War by Senator Joseph
McCarthy into Americans suspected of having unpatriotic
behavior, or the tightening of airport security after the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.)
-
The National Security Agency asserts that it strives to balance
national security with the need to maintain personal liberty.
Discuss with students what "personal liberty" means to them.
What is included in this term?
(Students may suggest the right to practice their religion,
freedom of speech, the right to peacefully protest, or the
right to privacy.)
-
Ask students what governs our rights in this country. If no one
brings it up, tell students that the Bill of Rights—the
first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution ratified in
1791—was the country's first legislation protecting
citizens' rights. Distribute the
U.S. Bill of Rights
handout to each student.
-
Have students read the Bill of Rights. After everyone has read
the document, have students identify the overarching areas
covered by these rights. Discuss as a class what these areas
are.
(Some areas include the freedom to practice religion and
speak freely, the right to bear arms, the right to personal
privacy, the right to due process of law, and the right to be
treated humanely.)
Which areas and rights do students think apply most to them?
-
Tell students that since the Bill of Rights was ratified more
than 200 years ago, the United States has passed additional laws
regarding citizens' rights. While national security measures are
implemented to protect individuals, such measures can also
restrict the rights of individuals they are designed to protect.
The main issue lawmakers must address with these regulations is
balancing national security interests with individual personal
rights. Organize students into teams, and distribute the
National Security vs. Individual Rights
handout. Tell students they will now consider what personal
liberties, if any, they would be willing to sacrifice in order
to maintain national security.
-
Assign a scenario from the handout to each team. Tell the teams
that, before coming to a final decision about whether a
situation would be permissible, they must first consider reasons
why the restriction of individual rights should be
allowed and also why it should not be allowed.
-
After all teams have reached a decision about their assigned
scenario, teams should take turns presenting their conclusions.
Have one team's representative describe the team's conclusions
and the reasoning behind how team members arrived at their
decision. Then discuss the scenario as a class. Do all class
members agree with the team's conclusion? If not, why not? After
all teams have presented, talk with students about how different
the world is now from when the original Bill of Rights was
passed. In what situations, if any, should restrictions of
personal rights be allowed? Which rights, if any, would students
be willing to compromise for the sake of strengthening national
security? Which rights would they consider sacred regardless of
the level of threat to individual safety?
Assessment
Use the following rubric to assess students' work.
|
Excellent
|
Satisfactory
|
Needs Improvement
|
National Security vs. Individual Rights
|
Students are active participants in class discussions. They
can see reasons for and against allowing their scenario and
can provide solid reasoning for the conclusions they have
drawn.
|
Students participate in class discussions and can provide a
conclusion for whether their scenario should be allowed, but
may not see all viewpoints involved in allowing the scenario.
|
Students do not participate in class discussions, and cannot
make a recommendation for whether the scenario they considered
is or is not acceptable.
|
The "The Spy Factory" activity aligns with the following National
Science Education Standards.
Grades 5-8
Science in Personal and Social Perspectives
• Science and technology in society
Grades 9-12
Science in Personal and Social Perspectives
• Science and technology in local, national, and global
challenges
Classroom Activity Author
Developed by Jeff Lockwood and WGBH Educational Outreach staff.
|
|