The production of a documentary film is never simple, but I seem
inevitably drawn to subjects that pose particularly difficult
challenges. On past projects, I have ventured with scientists and
camera crews through dense rain forests, rappelled deep into
limestone caves, and explored a lake filled with dissolved toxic
gas. Yet my journey into the crater of the volcano Nyiragongo was
undoubtedly one of the most complicated and dangerous productions of
my life.
We faced threats long before we even reached the volcano. Nyiragongo
is located in one of the world's most unstable, war-torn countries.
Though called the Democratic Republic of Congo, it's hardly a
working democracy. The region around the volcano, including the
crowded city of Goma, lies on the border between Congo and Rwanda.
Armed bandits crisscross the troubled region. These thugs live by
plundering, and they don't hesitate to kill. We knew that our film
crew possessed many items of great interest to them, including a
generator, solar panels, and walkie-talkies.
One night we had a frightening near-encounter with some of these
bandits. We were in a village outside of Goma when we heard shots
being fired. Jacques Durieux, the scientist leading the expedition,
was very nervous. I didn't know it at the time, but he was carrying
a large sum of cash in order to pay the local handlers helping with
the production. We heard warnings on the radio that the bandits were
coming our way, and soon a military escort arrived to take us back
to Goma. We learned that a group of bandits had attacked the
neighboring village and that two of the assailants had been killed.
After the incident, the United Nations asked us not to leave Goma
after nightfall for the rest of our stay.
Up and into the volcano
Once we reached the volcano, there seemed, at first, relatively
little to fear—after all, armed escorts were watching over us.
But we soon learned how unfriendly this environment was, and how
this would complicate an already daunting film shoot.
After climbing to the 11,400-foot summit, we set up our base camp at
the crater's edge. There were no flat areas on the steep slope, so
we had to flatten the ground and lay down small platforms on which
we could pitch our tents. We anchored ourselves in for the night and
hoped all of our equipment would be secure despite the high winds.
The scientists would be working primarily on a rocky plateau deep
within the crater. Rather than shuttle back and forth to the base
camp, which would take hours each day, we set up another camp
directly on the plateau. Filming in an environment as hostile as a
volcano demands not just a great deal of preparation but also a lot
of equipment. To facilitate the transport of the scientific
materials, film gear, food, and other supplies, we installed what
essentially amounts to an elevator between the edge of the crater
and the spot where we were working. It was nearly 1,000 feet high!
This elevator saved us precious time.
Shaky ground
Contrary to what you might think, the risk of being surprised by an
eruption and streams of lava while you are inside a volcano is
practically zero. There are almost always warning signs of such
activity, and we were with scientists who know Nyiragongo well. The
main threat to this expedition was the unstable walls of the
volcano, which could collapse at any time. We could never trust the
ground we were walking on.
The ring-shaped plateau on which we were working—and
camping—was riddled with fractures, and the jagged rim clearly
showed where huge parts of the plateau had broken off and plummeted
to the lava lake below. While we were in the crater, we witnessed
collapsing rock and mud slides several times a day. But to do the
sampling, we had to be in this precise location at the edge of the
plateau.
By the time the sampling was completed, we had spent nearly two
weeks living inside the crater.
We all had harnesses, and the rope to which we were fastened was
tied to a spot many yards from the edge. Luckily there were no rock
slides or collapses while we were at the edge sampling and filming,
but I shudder to think what would have happened if there had been.
Would the anchor and rope have held if six people had fallen
simultaneously?
Roughing it
The living conditions inside the volcano were also very difficult.
We had the resources to cook only the simplest meals. We had brought
only a small hot plate to reheat water, and we ate dried food. This
was quite bearable, but the air quality in the volcano was not. When
there wasn't any wind, the volcano's gas plume and cinders rose
straight up from the lava lake skyward, and the air around us on the
plateau was relatively clear. But when the wind picked up, the
environment would change completely in a matter of minutes. Acidic
gases would blow over the plateau. We could barely see in front of
us, and what the researchers called "hairs of Pelée" swirled
around us. These are fine needles of solidified lava. Sometimes they
pierce the skin and break, making them very difficult to extract. We
often had to protect our eyes with safety glasses.
The air would become so unbreathable at times that the film crew had
to put on gas masks. In the film, we rarely see the researchers with
a mask, but that's mostly because they had become used to the gas.
In my opinion, they were making a mistake. Whether they're used to
it or not, the gas still attacks the respiratory system.
I for one am attracted by intense sensations and sometimes even by
danger.
By day, a gas mask is not too hard to wear, but things get tricky at
night. While we were asleep, as soon as we started sweating, the
plastic mask would stick to our skin. We often had to remove the
masks to dry our faces. We couldn't sleep well like this. After a
few days in these conditions, the whole crew was exhausted. Yet both
filmmakers and scientists pushed on. By the time the sampling was
completed, we had spent nearly two weeks living inside the crater.
Why make the effort
They aren't easy, but expeditions of this scope are necessary to
better understand volcanoes, and it's critical that scientists know
this particular volcano as well as possible. Because of its
proximity to Goma, with its 500,000 inhabitants, an eruption at
Nyiragongo could be catastrophic. All information gathered by
Durieux and his colleagues could help fill in a picture of what is
happening at the volcano.
Some scientists argue that it is not necessary to sample lava
directly at the bottom of the crater. But I think these critics are
forgetting one aspect of this effort: basic research. In my
mind—and this is just my personal opinion—asserting that
a sample from the lake of lava won't bring new information ignores
the possibility of making new discoveries. Scientific discoveries
don't always correspond to what we already know, and it's often by
detecting abnormalities that scientific research makes advances.
Even if the analysis of the lava samples shows nothing strikingly
new, it may later help to prove something we never suspected to be
true.
More and more, robotic technology and computer simulations allow
researchers to avoid taking life-threatening risks to advance
scientific knowledge. One day scientists may be able to take samples
from volcanoes and other hostile places without even leaving their
labs. That day may not be far off, and that's certainly a good
thing. But I for one am attracted by the chance to explore new
environments, by intense sensations, and sometimes even by danger.
In short, I am drawn to what we call adventure. In this sense, even
if it isn't rational, I hope that day never arrives.
|
Volcanologist Jacques Durieux makes a near 1,000-foot
descent from the crater's edge to a ring-shaped plateau
within Nyiragongo.
|
|
The 2002 eruption of Nyiragongo unleashed a flood of
scorching lava that caught the city of Goma by surprise.
More than 100 people died and 120,000 were left
homeless.
|
|
The expedition's base camp, perched precariously on the
fragile rim of the crater.
|
|
An exhausted but pleased Durieux holds his hard-won
sample of cooled, solidified lava.
|
|
|