In recent years, remote-sensing technologies have become as
commonplace in archeological fieldwork as khakis, spades, and
brushes. Such tools for virtual excavation generate rapid results
and are non-destructive, highly accurate, and usually
cost-effective. Here are ten of the modern archeologist's most
trusted remote-sensing tools, each of which routinely proves
invaluable in salvage excavations such as those that took place at
Zeugma in 2000.
|
|
|

|
|
|
Aerial Photography
The simplest of the remote-sensing techniques that
archeologists use, aerial photography allows experts to
discern aspects of a site that may be invisible from the
ground, such as floral patterns, the layout of large
monuments, and traces of old walls and roads. The technique
involves taking photographs with conventional camera and film
from an airplane, tethered blimp, helicopter, hot-air balloon,
or other airborne vehicle.
|

|
|
|
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
GIS has been described as a kind of layer cake, the
ingredients of which, for archeologists, include the plethora
of field data they typically collect in and around excavation
sites. While in the field, archeologists use GIS on their
laptop computers to fashion and manage detailed site maps, and
they can combine the results of remote-sensing tests with
spatial maps of the region created with the aid of Global
Positioning System units. Resulting maps collate the most
archeologically promising areas and display these sites
three-dimensionally.
|

|
|
|
Geophysical Diffraction Tomography (GDT)
A type of sonar used for detecting subterranean objects, a GDT
device shoots small shells into the soil. The shells generate
sound waves that bounce off underground features.
Archeologists drill small boreholes into the ground to
eavesdrop on these sound waves and measure their tonal shifts.
As the sound waves ricochet off objects, they can reveal the
depth and shape of the features, which archeologists can then
map three-dimensionally on computers.
|

|
|
|
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)
Ranging in size from small handheld models that one places
against the ground to larger ones that one drags across a
site, GPR devices use low-power radio waves to detect changes
in density underground. Unlike traditional radar, which
broadcasts into the air and uses a parabolic dish to focus the
returned waves, GPR uses a small but sensitive receiver placed
directly against the ground. Depending on their needs,
archeologists can adjust radio frequencies upward for shallow
sites or downward for deeper areas, though GPR devices produce
the greatest definition when reading depths of three feet or
less.
|

|
|
|
Imaging radar
Using radar across a broad spectrum of frequencies, imaging
radar can see through the ground to depths of up to ten feet,
penetrating sand, dirt, and even heavy vegetation; a buried
section of China's Great Wall was discovered this way. Space
shuttles or satellites outfitted with this equipment can
generate imaging radar maps by day or night and even in poor
weather conditions.
|

|
|
|
Infrared aerial photography
Buried structures can disturb vegetation above them by
blocking plants' growth or their access to groundwater. While
the archeologist's naked eye cannot perceive these subtle
abnormalities, infrared film can. By recording the heat
signature that plants give off, and by detecting places where
that signature has been interfered with, infrared photographs
can hint at promising areas for excavation. Experts take such
photographs from the air with a conventional camera using
infrared film.
|

|
|
|
Magnetometer
The handheld magnetometer, also referred to as a gradiometer,
proton magnetometer, or simply "mag," is loosely related to
metal detectors used to sweep beaches in search of lost coins
and jewelry. As one moves it over the ground, the mag
generates a small electronic signal that measures the
intensity of the magnetic field below the surface. Where there
is a break in the bedrock—at the entrance of a rock-cut
tomb, for example—the magnetometer records a dip in the
magnetic field. Archeologists often use mags in conjunction
with Global Positioning System receivers (which use satellites
to compute precise positions) to create detailed maps of the
subsurface.
|

|
|
|
Seismic vertical profiling survey
A seismic vertical profiling survey involves setting off
explosive charges that send seismic waves reverberating
through the ground. Archeologists measure and analyze the
acoustic waves reflected from rock layers beneath the surface.
These signals produce a cross-section showing potential
cavities where, for example, buried tombs might lie.
|

|
|
|
Soil resistivity mapping
A soil resistivity meter evaluates how well the soil conducts
electricity by measuring its moisture content. Heavily
compacted soil, such as a buried road or the floor of a
building, holds less moisture and is less conductive, while
ground that has been tampered with, such as trenches or
ditches, have high moisture content and readily conduct
electricity. In either case, archeologists use soil
resistivity mapping to pinpoint disturbed areas beneath the
surface.
|

|
|
|
Thermographic Infrared Multispectral Scanner (TIMS)
Originally designed for geological research, TIMS picks up
visible, infrared, microwave, and thermal data in a single
shot and allows archeologists to examine potential sites in
spectral bands best suited to their particular needs. TIMS
units mounted onto satellites and aircraft and can detect and
image patterns of disturbed soil at high resolution up to 30
feet below ground. This remote-sensing tool is particularly
useful for showing buried geologic features, such as ancient
river beds, along which people may have settled.
|
|
|