>>> A COLLEGE EDUCATION HAS LONG
BEEN SEEN AS THE SHE IS R SUREST
TICKET TO THE MIDDLE CLASS.
PRESIDENT OBAMA USED PRECISELY
THOSE WORDS THREE YEARS AGO WHEN
PROMOTING A SERIES OF
INITIATIVES AIMED AT REDUCING
THE COST OF GOING TO COLLEGE TO
MAKE IT MORE ACCESSIBLE FOR MORE
AMERICANS.
BUT IS A DREAM OF A COLLEGE
EDUCATION REALLY WORKING OUT FOR
MOST AMERICAN STUDENTS?
ACCORDING TO A NEW REPORT BY THE
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE, THE ANSWER
IS AN EMPHATIC NO, ACCORDING TO
THE REPORT TITLED HOW THE OTHER
HALF LEARNS LESS THAN ONE IN
FIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS MANAGED
TO TRAVEL SMOOTHLY FROM A HIGH
SCHOOL DIPLOMA TO A COLLEGE
DEGREE TO A CAREER.
THE REPORT CONCLUDES THAT MOST
STUDENTS ARE NOT WELL SERVED BY
THE HIGH SCHOOL TO COLLEGE
PIPELINE AND CALLS FOR A RADICAL
RETHINKING OF ITS PRIORITIES.
THIS SEGMENT IS PART OF OUR
CHASING THE DREAM INITIATIVE ON
POVERTY AND OPPORTUNITY IN
AMERICA.
AND JOINING US NOW IS THE AUTHOR
OF THAT REPORT, OREN CASS.
WELCOME TO THE PROGRAM.
>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.
>> WHAT DID YOUR REPORT LOOK AT
AND WHAT DID YOU FIND?
>> WE LOOKED AT THE DATA ON WHAT
HAPPENS TO STUDENTS AT EACH
STAGE OF THE PIPELINE AS THEY
MOVE THROUGH SCHOOL.
AND AT EACH STAGE IT ACTUALLY
LOOKS GOOD.
MOST STUDENTS GRADUATE HIGH
SCHOOL.
MOST OF THOSE STUDENTS GO TO
COLLEGE.
MOST COLLEGE STUDENTS GRADUATE.
BUT WHEN YOU ACTUALLY STEP BACK
AND LOOK AT THE WHOLE PICTURE
WHAT YOU FIND IS THAT BY THE END
THE VAST MAJORITY HAVE FALLEN BY
THE WAYSIDE.
SO EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE THIS
SYSTEM THAT'S REALLY EXCLUSIVELY
DESIGNED TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR
COLLEGE AND PUSH THEM THROUGH,
REALLY THAT'S NOT SERVING MOST
STUDENTS.
ESPECIALLY FAILING THE STUDENTS
WHO NEED THE MOST HELP AND WHO
REALLY WE SHOULD BE WORKING
HARDEST TO SUPPORT IF WE WANT TO
HELP THEM GET ON THEIR FEET AND
START A LIFE.
>> IT'S NOT JUST THEM, IT'S THAT
80%, IF YOU INCLUDE EVERY ASPECT
OF THAT PIPELINE FROM HIGH
SCHOOL GRADUATION TO CAREER,
IT'S 80%.
SO WHAT IS THE ANSWER?
WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE?
>> WELL, THE ANSWER IS TO
RECOGNIZE THAT WE'RE NOT GOING
TO SUCCEED IN DESIGNING A SYSTEM
WHERE EVERYONE GOES TO COLLEGE.
THAT'S NOT THE REALITY OF WHAT
STUDENTS ARE INTERESTED IN AND
WHAT THEIR APTITUDES ARE.
IF WE ACTUALLY WANT TO MEET
STUDENTS WHERE THEY ARE AND
SERVE THEM WELL AND PREPARE THEM
WE NEED TO DESIGN A SYSTEM FOR
THE PATHS THAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY
ON.
SO THAT MEANS HAVING HIGH
SCHOOLS THAT, YES, PREPARE KIDS
FOR COLLEGE, IF THAT'S THE
DIRECTION THEY'RE HEADED, BUT
SPEND JUST AS MUCH TIME AND
EFFORT PREPARING OTHER KIDS TO
MOVE RIGHT INTO THE WORKFORCE,
AND TO DEVELOP THE SKILLS THEY
NEED TO DO JOBS THAT THEY CAN DO
WITHOUT A COLLEGE DEGREE.
>> BUT THAT ASSUMES THAT KIDS
KNOW WHICH OF THESE TWO PATHS
THEY SHOULD GO ON.
YOU KNOW, WHEN I WAS READING
YOUR REPORT, I WAS THINKING OF
MALCOLM X, HE WANTED TO BE A
LAWYER, BUT HIS COUNSELOR SAID
NO, NO, YOU'RE NOT A LAWYER,
YOU'RE GOING TO BE A CARPENTER,
HOW DO WE PREVENT, IF THIS
HAPPENS, THAT PEOPLE ARE PUSHED
IN ONE DIRECTION BECAUSE OF
WHERE THEY ARE RIGHT THERE, OR
BECAUSE OF THE CLASS, OR COLOR,
ET CETERA?
>> WELL, I THINK THAT'S EXACTLY
THE RIGHT CONCERN TO RAISE.
AND THERE ARE A FEW THINGS WE
CAN DO.
ONE IS WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT
IT'S THE STUDENT'S DECISION, AND
THE FAMILY'S DECISION.
SO THE SCHOOL CAN GIVE ADVICE.
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY WE
WANT TO MAKE SURE FAMILIES ARE
MAKING CHOICES FOR THEIR KIDS.
SECOND THING WE CAN DO IS MAKE
SURE THAT THERE ARE ONRAMPS AND
OFF RAMPS IN BOTH DIRECTIONS.
SO JUST BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU'RE
HEADED DOWN MAYBE A VOCATIONAL
TRACK, THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU CAN
NEVER SWITCH.
AND THE LAST THING I THINK IS
REALLY IMPORTANT TO EMPHASIZE,
THOUGH, IS TO RECOGNIZE THAT WE
HAVE TO GET OUT OF THIS MIND-SET
THAT SOMEHOW BEING ON A COLLEGE
TRACK, THAT'S WHERE THE WINNERS
ARE, THAT'S THE TICKET TO
SUCCESS IN THE MIDDLE CLASS, IF
THAT'S NOT THE TRACK YOU'RE ON,
YOU'RE SOMEHOW A FAILURE.
FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE WELL PREPARED
AND DEVELOP GOOD SKILLS IN HIGH
SCHOOLS THERE ARE PLENTY OF JOBS
FOR PEOPLE WITH HIGH SCHOOL
DEGREES THAT PAIL OUT BETTER
THAN A LOT OF JOBS FOR PEOPLE
WITH COLLEGE DEGREES.
WE HAVE TO TREAT THESE AS EQUAL
TRACKS THAT MEET THE NEEDS OF
STUDENTS WHO MIGHT WANT TO BE ON
THEM.
ONE TRACK FOR WINNERS AND YOU'RE
NOT ON THAT TRACK AND YOU'RE A
FAILURE.
>> QUICKLY DEFINE FOR US WHAT
THAT VOCATIONAL TRACK LOOKS
LIKE.
THOSE OF US OF A CERTAIN AGE
THINK ABOUT SHOP WHEN WE THINK
OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION.
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
>> IT'S IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE
THAT MOST OF THE REST OF THE
DEVELOPED WORLD, CERTAINLY IN
EUROPE, DOES THIS.
MOST STUDENTS ARE ON WHAT WE
WOULD CALL A VOCATIONAL TRACK.
AND IT'S NOT SHOP.
IT'S INTENSIVE TECHNICAL
TRAINING, ALONGSIDE CLASSROOM
TRAINING, BUT THAT EMPHASIZES
NOT, YOU KNOW, NECESSARILY THE
ADVANCED MATH OR ENGLISH
LANGUAGE SKILLS THAT ARE
SUPPOSED TO PREPARE YOU FOR
COLLEGE, BUT INSTEAD EMPHASIZES
ACTUAL PRACTICAL WORKPLACE
SKILLS.
SO WHATEVER TYPE OF TRACK YOU'RE
ON, ACTUALLY THE TOP VOCATIONAL
TRACK RIGHT NOW IS HEALTH CARE.
IT'S LEARNING HOW TO DO THOSE
SORT OF MIDDLE SKILL DIAGNOSTIC
RELATED TASKS IN OUR HEALTH CARE
SYSTEM.
SO WHETHER YOU'RE DOING THAT,
WHETHER YOU'RE DOING SOMETHING
IN ADVANCED MANUFACTURING, IT'S
COMBINING CLASSROOM LEARNING AND
THEN ALSO GETTING PEOPLE INTO
THE WORKFORCE SOONER.
SO BY THE TIME YOU'RE 17 OR 18
YOU HAVE SOME OF YOUR TIME IN
YOUR CLASSROOM, BUT ALSO SOME OF
THE TIME WITH AN EMPLOYER
LEARNING ON THE JOB.
>> AS YOUR REPORT POINTS OUT, A
TRULY FUNCTIONING VOCATIONAL
TRACK IS GOING TO BE EXPENSIVE.
HOW DO YOU PAY FOR IT?
>> THE TRUTH IS IT'SICS PENSIVE,
BUT IT'S A LOT CHEAPER THAN
CHEJ.
ONE OF THE CRAZY THINGS WE DO IS
WE SAY IF YOU'RE GOING TO
COLLEGE, WE THROW BILLIONS AND
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SPENDS ABOUT $70
BILLION A YEAR, SUBSIDIZING
COLLEGE, STATES SPEND ANOTHER
$80 BILLION A YEAR.
BY CONTRAST THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SPENDS ABOUT $1
BILLION A YEAR ON VOCATIONAL
TRACKS.
SO YES, IT'S EXPENSIVE TO
PROVIDE GOOD VOCATIONAL
EDUCATION TO PEOPLE.
BUT IF WE RECOGNIZE THAT IT'S AN
ALTERNATIVE TO COLLEGE, THEY
CERTAINLY DESERVE JUST AS MUCH
SUPPORT, IF NOT MORE AS WHAT WE
PROVIDE TO THE COLLEGE -- SO
FRANKLY THE ANSWER IS TO MOVE
SOME OF THAT MONEY TO SAY LOOK,
FOLKS WHO ARE IN COLLEGE, WE
WISH THEM THE BEST, WE WANT TO
SUPPORT THEM IN DOING THAT,
TOWARD HIGHER EARNING AND THEY
SHOULD BE ACTUALLY FUNDING MORE
OF THAT THEMSELVES, EVEN IF IT
MEANS THEY HAVE TO PAY IT BACK
LATER IN LIFE, WE'RE GOING TO
TAKE MORE OF THE MONEY AND NOT
PUT IT JUST TO THAT COLLEGE
TRACK, BUT ACTUALLY PUT IT TO
SAYING THAT THE PEOPLE WHO
AREN'T HEADED TO COLLEGE DESERVE
AT LEAST AS MUCH SUPPORT, AND I
WOULD SAY MORE SUPPORT BECAUSE,
YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY IN TODAY'S
ECONOMY, THAT'S WHERE WE'RE
FALLING BEHIND.
THAT'S NOT WHERE WE'RE NOT
SERVING PEOPLE WELL.
>> SO, OREN, THIS IS A RADICAL
SHIFT IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM.
WHO IS ON BOARD WITH THIS?
WHAT FORCES, WHAT FACTORS?
WHAT DO YOU THINK WILL MOST
OPPOSE IT?
>> WELL, YOU KNOW, THE REALITY
IS, A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE ON BOARD
WITH IT RHETORICALLY.
I THINK WE HEAR FROM POLITICIANS
LEFT AND RIGHT, AT THIS POINT,
WANTING TO DO MORE OF THIS KIND
OF EDUCATION, WANTING TO DO MORE
APPRENTICESHIPS.
ONE THING I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT
IS DONALD TRUMP TALKED ABOUT
MORE OF THIS IN HIS STATE OF THE
UNION AND THEN THE DEMOCRATIC
RESPONSE WAS ACTUALLY DELIVERED
FROM A VOCATIONAL SCHOOL.
SO THIS IS SOMETHING I THINK
EVERYONE IS COMMITTED TO IN
PRINCIPLE.
THE PROBLEM IS GOING FROM THE
PRINCIPLES TO ACTUALLY REALIZING
WHAT IT WOULD TAKE.
AND A LITTLE BIT TO YOUR POINT,
REALIZING THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE
GOING TO HAVE TO GIVE SOMETHING
UP.
SO THE PEOPLE ON THE OTHER SIDE
OF THIS ARE THE FOLKS WHO LIKE
THE EXISTING SYSTEM MOST.
CERTAINLY THE HIGHER EDUCATION
LOBBY IS VERY HAPPY WITH THE
CURRENT ARRANGEMENT AND WOULD
RESIST THIS KIND OF SHIFT.
CERTAINLY SOME FOLKS IN TEACHERS
UNIONS WOULD HAVE ISSUE WITH IT
BECAUSE YOU'D BE TALKING ABOUT
FEWER TRADITIONAL TEACHERS, LESS
CLASSROOM TIME, AND MORE
INVESTMENT IN ALTERNATIVE TYPES
OF EDUCATION, BUT AT THE END OF
THE DAY IT'S GOING TO BE A
CULTURAL QUESTION FOR OUR
COUNTRY, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE SAY
VOCATIONAL EDUCATION IS GREAT,
BUT IT'S ALWAYS FOR SOMEONE
ELSE'S KIDS.
AND WHAT WE HAVE TO REALIZE IS
THAT THOSE SOMEONE ELSE'S KIDS
ARE MOST KIDS AND THEY'RE
PROBABLY IN SOME CASES YOUR KIDS
TOO.
IF WE WANT TO BE SERVING
EVERYBODY WELL, WE REALLY HAVE
TO SHIFT THAT OBLIGATION AND
SAY, WHAT WILL IT TAKE FOR THE
NON-COLLEGE PATHWAY NOT TO BE
SOMETHING FOR OTHER KIDS, BUT
SOMETHING THAT YOU'RE PROUD TO
HAVE YOUR OWN KIDS ON TO?
>> WELL, OREN, WE'LL HAVE TO END
IT THERE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING US
TODAY.
>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.