Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
Photo of Bill Moyers Bill Moyers Journal
Bill Moyers Journal
Bill Moyers Journal
Watch & Listen The Blog Archive Transcripts Buy DVDs

« Corporations, Political Spending, & the Supreme Court | Main | A Single-Payer Solution? »

Michael Winship: Lobbyists Retreat But Never Surrender

(Photo by Robin Holland)

Below is an article by JOURNAL senior writer Michael Winship. We welcome your comments below.

"Lobbyists Retreat But Never Surrender"
By Michael Winship

George Washington's birthday is approaching and with it will come the attendant mythology: hatchet and cherry tree, wooden teeth, throwing a silver dollar across the Potomac River - or the Rappahannock.

Of course, as the old joke goes, a dollar went a lot further then. Today, if you tried to hurl a silver dollar across the Potomac, chances are some member of Congress would snatch it in flight like one of those nature film grizzly bears grabbing a salmon in mid-leap.

And the more likely person doing the throwing would be a lobbyist, tossing coins in the air to keep the playful legislator's attention. The other day, the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics reported that more than 15,600 companies spent at least $3.2 billion on federal lobbying last year. Five hundred thirty-five members of the House and Senate, more than 13,000 registered lobbyists in DC - you do the math.

This week, White House Special Counsel Norm Eisen blogged about President Obama's plans to further crack down on lobbyists by updating the Lobbying Disclosure Act and getting Congress to mandate "low-dollar limits on the contributions lobbyists may bundle or make to candidates for federal office," bundling being that insidious practice by which you raise a lot of money by hitting up a number of people for contributions and "bundling" their donations together.

Good luck with that, Norm. As we've seen, lobbyists are brilliantly devious at figuring out ways into the inner sanctums, and whoever's behind the door tends to welcome them with open arms, as long as they've arrived with the secret password - "Cash."

Example: last weekend, both Democratic and Republican members of Congress held retreats, ostensibly to go away some place and sagely contemplate their navels, discussing issues and plotting strategy. Guess who else was there?

The House Republican Caucus chose to stay near Washington at the Renaissance Baltimore Harborplace Hotel, all the easier for lobbyists to make a quick sprint up Interstate 95 and pitch woo. Among those addressing the Caucus were President Obama - you've seen the video of his give-and-take with them last Friday - and the ubiquitous former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, the GOP equivalent of a rash that won't go away.

The meeting was organized by the Congressional Institute, which describes itself as "a not-for-profit corporation dedicated to helping Members of Congress better serve their constituents and helping their constituents better understand the operations of the national legislature." It holds seminars for legislators and their staffs, publishes a handbook on floor procedure and sponsors the annual Congressional Art Competition.

The reality, as the Center for Media and Democracy's SourceWatch Web site reports, is that the Congressional Institute is "funded by corporate contributions and run by top Republican lobbyists." Twelve of its 14 board members are registered lobbyists, including its chair, Daniel Meyer of The Duberstein Group, a lobby firm founded by former Reagan chief of staff Ken Duberstein; vice chair Barbara Morris-Lent, who has been a consultant to Verizon and is the wife of former Republican Congressman Norman Lent; and its secretary Gary Andres, a columnist for Rupert Murdoch's right-wing Weekly Standard and vice president of public policy and research for the lobby company Dutko Worldwide. Many of them are former Republican congressional staff members; two of them worked for ex-Speaker Gingrich.

A list of the Congressional Institute's financial contributors reads like a Who's Who of corporate America: among them have been General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Time Warner, UPS, Merck and tobacco giant Altria.

Lee Fang, a researcher for the progressive Center for American Progress Action Fund, paid a visit on the Republicans at their Baltimore hotel. In the time before Congressional Institute representatives told him to scram or face arrest, he found out quite a lot.

The aforementioned Dan Meyer was on his way to the retreat - his Duberstein clients include Goldman Sachs, BP, HealthNet and AHIP, the health insurance industry trade group that fought tooth and nail against the public option in the health care fight.

Also in attendance, according to Fang, was Institute board member Michael Johnson. A lobbyist at the OB-C Group, Johnson "touts himself as a 'Republican heavyweight' whose firm represents the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, JPMorgan Chase, and the health insurance giant WellPoint." And as he was pointed to the exit, Fang spotted John Sampson, chief lobbyist for Microsoft.

Meanwhile, Democrats chose to bask in sunnier climes, and some select lobbyists decided to grab their towels and Jamba Juice and enjoy the balmy weather with them. A dozen senators headlined the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's winter retreat at a Ritz Carlton resort in Miami Beach, a cozy little hideaway with 375 guest rooms, "sumptuous" marble baths, spa and a $2 million dollar art collection.

The senators included DSCC chair Robert Menendez, Carl Levin, Frank Lautenberg, Claire McCaskill and Bernie Sanders. Riding in the wake of their surf were 108 lobbyists - special guests who shared meals, receptions and "informal conversations" with the legislators.

According to the Web site Politico.com, among those attending were "top lobbying officials for many of the industries Democrats regularly attack: Represented were the American Bankers Association, the tobacco company Altria, the oil company Marathon, several drug manufacturers, the defense contractor Lockheed, and most of the large independent lobbying firms."

The price of admittance wasn't released but the maxiumun contribution to the DSCC for similar events is $30,000 a head. Interesting when compared to recent remarks by Senator Menendez. Politico's Ben Smith quoted a January 27 Menendez press release: "In the upcoming elections, voters will face a choice between Republicans who are standing with Wall Street fat cats, bankers and insurance companies - or Democrats who are working hard to clean up the mess we inherited by putting the people's interests ahead of the special interests."

Hearing all this makes me think we should stage a national intervention and ship the entire 111th Congress off to a different kind of retreat, a sort of political rehab facility. They would be kept isolated from lobbyists and special interests for as many weeks as it takes for them to be weaned from money and pork and made to pay attention to the needs of their constituents - and the nation.

There would be lectures, motivational speakers, readings from the Federalist Papers, and daily screenings of "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington." And emblazoned across its entryway would be a denunciation of money and politics, Thomas Jefferson's 1816 battle cry to "crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country."

I know it's just a fantasy, but I feel better already.


Please note that the views and opinions expressed by Michael Winship are not necessarily the views and opinions held by Bill Moyers or BILL MOYERS JOURNAL.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/1910

Comments

Hearing all this makes me think we should stage a national intervention and ship the entire 111th Congress off to a different kind of retreat, a sort of political rehab facility. Yes it is. You know where the key point is.

I think that we should pull back are troops from the war in Afganistan.

Is democracy dead in this country? Yes we have the vote but the process is so corrupted by lobbyist that represent mainly corporations, this is buying the votes of Congress. This means that Congress is not representing the general population but a handful of individuals/corporations. This was very evident in the Senate with the healthcare bill. The inaction of the Senate in this matter was reprehensible. The only way to correct this is by not allowing lobbyists money to be used in the influencing of policy in this country. Either provide government funds to be used for campaigns or limit the donation by citizens to be no more than $1000 per year and to eliminate the donations of lobbyists. The other thing that makes this so ridiculous is the bizarre decision of the Supreme Court that encourages this behavior. Lets do something right for a change. I believe a bill was introduce in the Congress to do this by the Democrats but was rejected by the Republicans.

If Congress did not deliver the goods then corporation bucks would be like deer on the 1st day of hunting season--no where to be seen.

Therefore, if Congress did not make it worth while Corp. big guys would go Vagas without Congressmen.

Congress is BROKEN & until the SENIORITY System is disolved any change will be short lived as the "new good guys" will have attained Seniority and we will be right back here!

It's plain as the nose on your face, man!

Billy Bob Florida where winter is hanging on as long as a lobbiest to a crooked (senior) Congressman

I have a dream I think someone once said! it is:-
a) That the political parties will unanimously vote a ban on all lobbying other than that done by individual voters in a senators or Representatives electoral area, and certainly the payment in cash or benefit of any kind to be made to any congressmen.
b) If you wish to run for office Senate or House you are given ( signatories to be as now)
i) A fixed state per capita $ amount for each voter to each candidate the same.
ii) Time by local radio and TV stations for advertisements related to your campaign FOC sme to each candidate
iii) No corporate or special interest bodies may give any candidate any money benefit in kind.
They can do thier thing on a political and policy basis thru adverts or whatever, but may not undermine or attack a candidate or express specific support either verbally or cash or benefit in kind wise for any candidate.
For those seeking national office contributions must come only from Voters to the National committees of parties be that GOP Democrats or Independents.
Get the huge money out of politics in USA or it will never be of the people for the people and by the people!
Regards.
Hodgson.

Nice reporting. DSCC has for the last four years or so been sending out fundraising solicitations to progressives about how we'll meet the progressive agenda if we just give money to DSCC. I used to NEVER give political contributions except to particlar candidates I liked. But DSCC talked the talk, and had some generalized goals like a supermajority in the Senate that made it seem as if it ws safe to give to DSCC. Now it is obvios that was a mistake, and that unless it arranges "access" for the little donors comparable to "access" for the big ones there's no point playing. At the same time as they're telling us who the "enemy" is, they are meeting in private with and making lots of money from the "enemy."

So next time DSCC contacts you or your friend, hand them back Winship's blog and tell them, "Nothing for you until we have equal tinme."

Nice reporting. DSCC has for the last four years or so been sending out fundraising solicitations to progressives about how we'll meet the progressive agenda if we just give money to DSCC. I used to NEVER give political contributions except to particlar candidates I liked. But DSCC talked the talk, and had some generalized goals like a supermajority in the Senate that made it seem as if it ws safe to give to DSCC. Now it is obvios that was a mistake, and that unless it arranges "access" for the little donors comparable to "access" for the big ones there's no point playing. At the same time as they're telling us who the "enemy" is, they are meeting in private with and making lots of money from the "enemy."

So next time DSCC contacts you or your friend, hand them back Winship's blog and tell them, "Nothing for you until we have equal tinme."

If pro is opposite of con then what is the opposite of progress? CONGRESS!!!!!

here's my fantasy...make 'em live on the average income of the constituents in their districts. what's congressional pay 174K? that puts them in the "wealthiest" of all americans...
http://www.sfexaminer.com/politics/ap/census-data-show-a-widening-income-gap-in-us-as-poor-people-take-bigger-hit-in-recession.html
maybe if they actually had to navigate life like the rest of us, they'd start to think of us once in a while.
will share...:)

Post a comment

THE MOYERS BLOG is our forum for viewers' comments intended for discussing and debating ideas and issues raised on BILL MOYERS JOURNAL. THE MOYERS BLOG invites you to share your thoughts. We are committed to keeping an open discussion; in order to preserve a civil, respectful dialogue, our editors reserve the right to remove or alter any comments that we find unacceptable, for any reason. For more information, please click here.

THE MOYERS BLOG
A Companion Blog to Bill Moyers Journal

Your Comments

Podcasts

THE JOURNAL offers a free podcast and vodcast of all weekly episodes. (help)

Click to subscribe in iTunes

Subscribe with another reader

Get the vodcast (help)

For Educators    About the Series    Bill Moyers on PBS   

© Public Affairs Television 2008    Privacy Policy    DVD/VHS    Terms of Use    FAQ