|
Should Lab Animals Be Used for Testing? |
|||
|
Baltimore, 1949 Background: Throughout the 1940s, however, the anti-vivisection movement began to grow powerful. To these animal rights activists, animal experimentation was a moral and ethical outrage and had to be stopped. They staged protests and conducted letter campaigns that filled mailboxes across the country. Government officials took note and began to discuss whether or not to restrict animal experimentation. Much of the attention in the eastern United States was focused on the now world-famous Johns Hopkins. By the late 1940s, Blalock and his colleagues faced severe public pressure as well as government hearings to confront the vivisection question. |
![]() |
||
|
|
|||
|
Select one of these three choices:
Blalock realizes that increasing public antagonism and government involvement will create too much of a problem for Hopkins. It might be best to find another way to test new surgical techniques.
The general public will not understand the details of why dogs are important for medicine. There is no reason to waste time better spent at in the operating room and the lab.
The general public does not understand why dogs are so important for medical experimentation. Before the antivivisectionists grow too powerful, it might be wise to address the issue and show why dogs are necessary. |
![]() |
||