Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
 
The Presidents Connect today's election issues with the past


filmmore
Ronald Reagan
Selected President
Ronald Reagan
Overview
Early Career
Domestic Politics
Foreign Affairs
Presidential Politics
Legacy

Vote on the Issues
Primary Sources

Teacher's Guide
The Film & More

Purchase Video/DVD
Select a President

 

Historian Robert Dallek on Reagan and Foreign Affairs

Play RealAudio
Requires the RealAudio Player. Download the player from Real.com.

ROBERT DALLEK: Ronald Reagan in foreign affairs, I think, was someone who had certain, very general ideas, general propositions by which he lived: to combat communism, to build up the American military power to assure our national security against any conceivable threat. Now, he was well served by a group of foreign policy advisors who were sensible, who were realistic, people like Cap Weinberger and George Shultz, Jim Baker. They helped him greatly.

And he was also served by circumstance. He happened to be there at the right time, it was the right moment, the Soviet Union was going into an eclipse, it could not sustain itself with its economic and internal contradictions for all that much longer, and Reagan happened to be there and had the wisdom to take advantage of it. So I would say he has a general design, but the fact that he appears to be so successful in foreign affairs also has to do, a great deal, with circumstance, with luck. As the great American essayist Ralph Waldo Emerson said, "Events are in the saddle and ride mankind," and Reagan was fortunate that the events turned in his favor.

Jimmy Carter, by contrast, in the 1970s, was very unlucky. He had to deal with the oil crunch, he had to deal with the Afghani invasion by the Soviets, a series of events that served him very poorly. Reagan was lucky, but he was also, had a good general design, and he had effective advisors.

Return to Interviews >>


 

Major funding provided by the National
Endowment for the Humanities and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting

NEH Corporation for Public Broadcasting


Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this Web site do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.