Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Rollover text informationAmerican Experience Logo
The Rockefellers















spacer above content
Krugman Interview

Was Rockefeller’s monopoly necessary?

Paul Krugman
spacer
spacerPlay Realvideo
It's complicated. In a way, at least my understanding of it is that an important part of the reason for his monopoly was that only a tremendously powerful oil company would have the bargaining leverage to compete with, to control the monopoly power of the railroads. So in a way, Rockefeller was a counter bearing weight to the power of the railroads. There were probably in the early stages, substantial advantages to that unification of resources. By the time Standard Oil was broken up, I think it's pretty clear that the usefulness of that monopoly had passed. And you can see by the fact that there don't seem to have been any big costs to breaking Standard Oil up into a number of component companies. It’s probably true that in 1885, there were a lot of gains to having a unified oil industry. By 1915, they were probably long since dissipated.

previous | return to questions | next


Site Navigation

Special Features: Online Poll | Corner the Market | Krugman Interview | Rockefellers at Play | Attica Prison Riot | Clash of Titans | "McClure's" Excerpts | Ludlow Massacre

The Rockefellers Home | The Film & More | Special Features | Timeline | Maps | People & Events | Teacher's Guide

The American Experience | Feedback | Search & Site Map | Shop | Subscribe | Web Credits

© New content 1999-2000 PBS Online / WGBH