In the years since Hamilton's simulations, empirical
support for his hypothesis has been growing. There is,
first, the fact that asexuality is more common in
species that are little troubled by disease: boom-and-bust
microscopic creatures, arctic or high-altitude plants
and insects. The best test of the Red Queen hypothesis,
though, was a study by Curtis Lively and Robert Vrijenhoek,
then of Rutgers University in New Jersey, of a little
fish in Mexico called the topminnow.
The topminnow, which sometimes crossbreeds with another
similar fish to produce an asexual hybrid, is under
constant attack by a parasite, a worm that causes "black-spot
disease." The researchers found that the asexually
reproducing topminnows harbored many more black-spot
worms than did those producing sexually. That fit
the Red Queen hypothesis: The sexual topminnows could
devise new defenses faster by recombination than the
asexually producing ones.
|
|
It could
well be that the deleterious mutation hypothesis
and the Red Queen hypothesis are both true, and that sex
serves both functions. Or that the deleterious mutation
hypothesis may be true for long-lived things like mammals
and trees, but not for short-lived things like insects,
in which case there might well be need for both models
to explain the whole pattern. Perpetually transient, life
is a treadmill, not a ladder.  |
|