|

|

|
|
The sidewheel steamship Central America
|
Who Owns Lost Ships?
Part 2 |
Back to Part 1
The struggle for ownership of the 19th-century sidewheel
steamer Central America is a case in point. Carrying 21
tons of gold from the California gold rush, the ship went down
in a storm off South Carolina in 1857. A treasure-hunting
consortium discovered and claimed the wreck in 1987, and a
federal district court backed up their claim under the law of
finds, declaring that the marine insurance companies who
underwrote the loss of the shipment had lost all commercial
records of doing so and had thus effectively abandoned the
ship. But a court of appeals reversed the decision, ruling
that one could not lightly presume abandonment, particularly
since the technology needed to find and retrieve goods from
the wreck had only recently come into existence. In the end,
citing the time, effort, and money the salvors had sunk into
the retrieval, and the care they had taken in preserving
artifacts (which included such delicate goods as cigars and
contemporary newspapers), the appellate court applied the law
of salvage to the case and awarded the salvors 90 percent of
the gold bullion and coins pulled from the wreckage.
Salvage vs science
The Central America decision irked many marine
archeologists, who pointed out that not a single archeological
report has come out of the operation. This is true of most
excavations by salvors, says Toni Carrell, a marine
archeologist who chairs the Advisory Council for Underwater
Archeology.
"If the proof of the pudding is in the eating, the proof of
good archeological work is published results," she says. "But
where are the reports? Where are the results?" The only
salvor's report that has even slightly approached a real
archeological summary, she says, was one published on a wreck
salvaged off Saipan. The goals of research and archeology
simply differ too greatly from those of commerical
exploitation. "We archeologists know we must go slowly, while
salvors must work quickly, because they've got investors
backing them who want to see a return through the sale of
artifacts," she says. For her part, Carrell sees no room for
compromise: "There's no way that archeologists and commercial
treasure salvors can work together. When the driving
motivation is profit rather than knowledge, archeology always
suffers."
The British sloop HMS De Braak
|
|
Indeed, many professional archeologists deem salvors little
more than tomb robbers, a feeling that poorly executed salvage
operations only fuel. The most notorious of such operations
was the salvage of the HMS De Braak, a 16-gun British
sloop wrecked off the coast of Delaware in 1798. After
discovering the wreck using side-scan sonar in 1984, a salvage
group, Sub-Sal, Inc., secured salvage rights and proceeded to
excavate the wreck using a crane, lifting it to the surface
and letting artifacts of inestimable historical value spill
overboard. They reportedly threw non-glittering items,
including an extremely rare 18th-century Royal Navy stove,
back into the sea. And they illegally disposed of human
remains and violated other federal and state laws. All told,
one writer deemed the excavation "one of the worst maritime
archeological disasters in American history."
The De Braak debacle helped lead to the passing of the
Abandoned Shipwrecks Act (ASA), a 1985 law that enabled states
to claim ownership of wrecks located up to three nautical
miles offshore. Such wrecks had to be embedded in submerged
lands or coralline formations owned by the state or rest
within areas included in (or deemed eligible for inclusion in)
the National Register of Historic Places.
|
The luxury steamboat Lady Elgin
|
The ASA also applies to inland waterways such as rivers and
lakes, which initially spelled bad news for Harry Zych. A
Chicago-based salvor, Zych discovered the remains of the
Lady Elgin, a double-decked luxury steamboat that
collided with a lumber schooner in Lake Michigan during a gale
in 1860, killing about 380 passengers, including many of
Wisconsin's Democratic elite. (Historians say the wreck
contributed to Abraham Lincoln's victory in that year's
presidential election; a Republican, Lincoln carried 56
percent of the Wisconsin vote.) After the ASA came into force,
the State of Illinois tried to claim ownership of the wreck,
but Zych countered by showing that the owners—the CIGNA
insurance company, successor to a company that had paid claims
on the wreck—had never abandoned the
Lady Elgin. A federal district court agreed, and in May
1999, after a 10-year court battle, Zych gained salvage rights
to the wreckage and its associated goods.
While some have unsuccessfully challenged the ASA's
constitutionality, the act faced its gravest challenge in the
recent case of the Brother Jonathan. A Gold Rush
steamer that sank off Crescent City, California in 1865 with a
cargo of gold, the Brother Jonathan was found in 1993
by a salvage company, Deep Sea Research, Inc. (DSR). The State
of California claimed it as an abandoned shipwreck in its
waters, but like Zych, DSR convinced the courts that the
wreck's insurers, who had transferred their ownership interest
to DSR, had never abandoned the ship, and thus the
Brother Jonathan belonged to DSR. When the state
challenged this ruling, the case went to the U.S. Supreme
Court, which ruled that federal courts have jurisdiction in
admiralty cases involving shipwrecks and other artifacts not
actually in a state's possession. In March 1999, the two sides
settled, with DSR getting 80 percent of the valuable gold
coinage pulled from the wreck.
Continue: A paper tiger?
Stories in the Timber
|
Explore the Shipwreck
|
Who Owns Lost Ships?
Buoyancy Brainteasers
|
Teacher's Guide
| Resources |
Transcript
| Site Map
Voyage of Doom Home
Editor's Picks
|
Previous Sites
|
Join Us/E-mail
|
TV/Web Schedule
About NOVA |
Teachers |
Site Map |
Shop |
Jobs |
Search |
To print
PBS Online |
NOVA Online |
WGBH
©
| Updated November 2000
|
|
|