tehranbureau An independent source of news on Iran and the Iranian diaspora
nextback

Draining Iran's Treasury

by REIHANEH MAZAHERI in Paris

20 Apr 2010 19:4917 Comments
753007421_93a3453145.jpgPart II: Budget manipulations and the Basij power grab.

This second installment follows the author's report (Part 1) on Ahmadinejad's cultural budget.

Since 2006, a large portion of the national cultural budget has been diverted to religious foundations and especially the Basij (militia) groups.

Although no accurate data on the number of Iranian mosques has ever been available, according to a political finance expert in Tehran, about 6,000 such centers were established between 2005 and 2009. These actions, taken during Ahmadinejad's first term, paid off during last year's post-election protests -- the suppression of the demonstrators was handled in large part by members of nongovernmental religious establishments such as mosques and the Basij groups they host.

It is not a secret that, well before he first became president, Ahmadinejad had initiated his financial support for the religious forces that he would later employ. One publicly known instance is his 2004 donation of 11 billion tomans ($1.5 million, in 2009 terms) to the types of organizations I have referred to in my articles.

This sort of financial support accelerated during his first term in office, via the government's budget rather than private patronage. One example is the backing provided to the High Council of Religious Studies Center of Qom, the hozeh, which controls and manages the nation's main clerical base. When Khatami handed the presidency to Ahmadinejad in 2005, the budget for the hozeh was 23 billion tomans. By last year, it had risen to 180 billion tomans, a fourfold increase even after a generous allowance for inflation.

Another example is the sprawling Organization of Islamic Propaganda. This agency operates under the auspices of the Islamic Republic's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. One of its primary tasks is the arrangement and management of all pro-government demonstrations. It showed its full capability on December 30, only three days after the bloody Ashura anti-government demonstrations, when it delivered onto the streets of Tehran a mass of demonstrators supportive of the regime. There are no exact data regarding its total budget, but according to the official news agency of the Islamic Republic, government contributions to it increased by 73 percent between the past two fiscal years. For perspective, we can point to the publicly known portion of the organization's budget, which has tripled in size since the end of the last Reformist government, five years ago, when it was just below 150 billion tomans.

The current government has allocated many obscure budget items each year for the "expansion of religious culture," which are destined for such organizations. These items have been difficult to trace and pin down, at least so far. Although the increased outlay for religious foundations in the national budget this fiscal year faced some criticism, Ahmadinejad did not retreat on the issue. Thus, a large share of the fiscal 2010-11 budget devoted to culture will be allocated to "special" foundations, such as religious centers.

The government's attempts, over the last four years, to garner more popular support by exploiting emotional religious fervor does not seem to have been very successful. Nonetheless, Ahmadinejad and his retinue continue to allocate a major part of the national budget to religious foundations, as well to as install and nurture supporters in the country's cultural institutions.

This year, the budget of mosque-based organizations, the government's essential base of popular support, has been increased to 25 billion tomans ($25 million). According to Mohammad Hossein Saffar Harrandi, minister of Islamic guidance under the previous Reformist administration, the comparable 2004 budget was only 1.6 billion tomans (about 3 billion tomans adjusted for inflation). These centers often serve as bases for the local Basij, which carry out the government's religious agenda.

A Tehran-based specialist in religious issues points to the increase in the number of government's detractors and says that, while the government has tried to attract and absorb young people into religious foundations and establishments, prompting the large budget allocations, it has largely failed. In the aftermath of the election, we were witness to a remarkable level of participation by the youth in protests against the government, and even the religious establishment.

Despite Ahmadinejad's claim that the budget he has submitted to the Majles (parliament) for fiscal year 1389 (2010‒11) offers unprecedented support for cultural endeavors, a glance at line items in the allocations charts shows that most have been earmarked for religious and military-related institutions, rather than actual cultural groups. Of course, these actions are not unique to this year's budget. Since 1384 (2005), the government has increased the budget allocations for religious foundations at much higher rates than any previous government.

It is on this basis that the corruption case against Mohamad Reza Rahimi, first deputy to Ahmadinejad, is under investigation in both the legislative and judiciary branches. In a prayer session in Qom, he declared that such criticism would only strengthen the ties between the government and the hozeh. Defending Ahmadinejad's actions, he pointed to the government's financial support for the hozeh.

In reaction to clerical complaints during his early years in the presidency, Ahmadinejad had encouraged the hozeh to accept official financial support: "The government and the treasury should not distance itself from the responsibility of expanding Islamic culture...." In March 2007, at a convention of the clergy and religious scholars of Fars Province, he expounded on the government's financial backing of religious centers and took aim at the critics of such supports. "From early on after the Revolution," he said, "one of a few perverse issues on the agenda, which were discussed in full openness, was that the government should not provide financial support to religious centers, as they might into organs of the government. But I think this is a wrong belief. How could it be possible for an Islamic government to separate itself from the hozeh?"

It was on this basis that Ahmadinejad's government allocated 11 billion tomans ($20 million, adjusted for inflation) in his first term to initiate the recruitment, training, and deployment of a cadre of clergy and evangelists. Next to this budget item, there is another called "Qu'ranic budget" that provides for printing Qu'rans and supporting cantors. The amount allocated to this once minor religious line item grew exponentially. According to Mohamad Hosseini, the Qu'ranic budget in 2005 was the 2009 equivalent of $1 million; under Ahmadinejad, the actual 2009 Qu'ranic budget was $15 million.

During the same period, Ahmadinejad's government focused its attention on mosques, repeatedly declaring them the fundamental base of its support. Again, according to Mohamad Hosseini, it was on this basis that over $10 million was allocated to construction and renovation of mosques during 2007-8. This type of expenditure had accelerated dramatically in 2007 with the provision of a $1 million loan for the construction of Tehran Mahdieh. According to the governor of Qom, much of the $2 million in government funds allocated to the Jamkaran mosque was used to expand nearby parking facilities.

This governmental largess is driven by the fact that a substantial proportion of each mosque's budget goes to the Basij stationed there. The militia is tasked with identifying and confronting local opponents of the regime.

An economics expert in Tehran points out that during Ahmadinajad's first term, defense and military expenditures were always the highest priority in budget proposals, followed by allocations for religious foundations. Education, health, and welfare routinely ranked at the bottom. This expert, comparing the budgets from the first and last years of Ahmadijad's initial term, reports on one very telling line item. Ayatollah Khamenei's budget for travel to Mashhad, the religious center in the eastern province of Khorasan, increased over 150-fold, adjusted for inflation, from less than $100,000 to more than $15 million. The expert believes that the Supreme Leader's unwavering support for Ahmadinejad in the tumultuous days after the election was due to the extent of support for religious groups and activities in the budget.*

Although the Basij and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are usually referred to as security and military organizations, adjunct to the official forces, their actions during the Ninth and now the Tenth governments of the Islamic Republic have consistently been directed toward the advancement of the government's internal policies.

Over the four years of the first Ahmadinejad administration, next to the budget items for specified organizations, there have been other items marked for building support for the notion of the Guardianship of the Jurist. It is not a mystery what the Revolutionary Guards' weekly publication, Sobhe Sadeq (Sincere Daybreak), refers to when it talks about the essential role of the Basij in the establishment and launching of cultural and physical education centers in towns and villages.

According to a declaration in Sobhe Sadeq by Hossein Taeb, head of the Guards' intelligence bureau, the Basij's budget has increased by 200 percent since Ahmadinejad took office. He added that the military-related budget had decreased by 15 percent during each of the last five years of the Reformists' administration, resulting in unpaid obligations. These were mostly taken care of by budgetary amendments in 2005. The remainder, he wrote, was addressed through the increase of the groups' baseline budgets, made necessary, he said, because more than just military organizations, "they are active in the construction and establishment of cultural camps and other benevolent undertakings."

According to the details of the proposed 2004-5 budget, the final budget of the previous Reformist government, 79.4 billion tomans were allocated to the Basij directly. But in its review, the Majles, which was taken over by the hardliners in the elections of February and May 2004, added 100 billion tomans, so that in the first year of Ahmadinejad's administration the budget of the Basij more than doubled, to just over 172 billion tomans. The Ahmadinejad administration's first budget proposal requested an additional credit of 173 billion tomans for the Basij, but no exact accounting of the total direct budget allocations and loans to the militia has ever been released.

*Editor's note: It needs to be pointed out, especially to readers not familiar with the Iranian economy, that the figures discussed here may seem small compared to U.S. budget items. But the fact that construction and real estate tax revenues in Iran are a fraction of those in the United States indicates the value of the support the government is providing the religious establishment, all of whose properties, including income-producing agricultural lands, are legally free from tax.

Copyright © 2010 Tehran Bureau

SHAREtwitterfacebookSTUMBLEUPONbalatarin reddit digg del.icio.us

17 Comments

So let me get this straight.

Here in the US, we spend a trillion dollars on war and a half-trillion every year on defense spending, where you're complaining that President Ahmadinejad spends a few hundred million bucks on culture.

Foreign wars or culture: what choice do you think is best?

Pirouz / April 21, 2010 2:50 AM

Yes, as Pirouz says, the money spent by AN was peanuts compared to the military budget of the Great Satan, and that was on culture, especially Islamic culture, like the art of basij, which was displayed beautifully on the demonstrator.

If you meditate carefully, you can see through your righteous halo that half of demonstrator is something that every moslem has to fight, with culture if necessary. So much better if culture funds support the demon fighting basij?

I have not read your article, because I can't really read, but I think it must be against the regime. Everything on TB is against the regime. But, I love culture, so don't pick on the regime for cultural spending. Culture is good. Very good. You shouldn't cares what form culture takes, nasty acidophilus or god loving camouflage with a baton in its hand raping our sisters AND brothers. Go for it. No cultural fund has ever produced more brotherly love than that spent by AN.

I will read your article when I am done spitting my venom on the demons, and after have I have learned how to really read.

Mad Hatter / April 21, 2010 6:53 AM

i agree with Pirouz...this article is utter nonsense

If only American journalists analysed their own governments actions this closely...maybe the world would be a better place. While millions are out of jobs and out of homes, you seem so worried about governmental spending on the other side of the world.

Wake up!

sam / April 21, 2010 8:02 AM

The IRI is combining,and conflating internal repression, foreign wars(they are shaping up) and culture. This is the hallmark of any fascist, military dictatorship.Here in the US, you and I outspend the next dozen countries in defence spending this doesn't change the fact that the Iran is a fascist ,military dictatorship.In China, they execute many more people but that doesn't change the fact that Iran is a fascist military dictatorship.In North Korea they aren't even allowed to register a pathetic,token vote that doesn't change the fact that Iran is what it is.

Pirooz / April 21, 2010 8:41 AM

@ Pirouz: I don't believe the author of this article in any way said that this is better or worse than US military spending.
As far as I could tell the point was to show that under Ahmadinejad's government funding for mosques, religious institutions (hozeh), the basij, the military and Khamenei's personal travel budget have all increased dramatically (even when considering inflation.)
Perhaps this is where record-oil profits have gone? And now time to do away with gas and electric subsidies because the government's budget is over burdened?
Unfortunately for the Iranian people this 'Islamic' regime (like previous monarchs!) only enriches* itself and its allies.
* Of course it also gives no-bid contracts to companies of the Revolutionary Guard (under the name of privatization. So PUBLICLY owned enterprises and land are being sold for no or negative profit to the regime's allies.

Hosain / April 21, 2010 10:06 AM

Pirouz, spending millions on propaganda posters, books and films is not culture advancing culture. All dictatorships do it to manipulate public opinion.

Also, if you had been chased by plaincloths basijis wielding knives, pistols and batons (as many of us had) may be you would be a bit more critical of where ahmadinejad's "cultural" money goes.

Prirouztar / April 21, 2010 1:01 PM

Pirouz - Foreign wars or culture???!!! You are right this is spending money on 'cultural' work. Brainwashing, propaganda, book burning, banning 'dissident' material (Western sociology for example!), imprisoning intellectuals and writers, and artists are indeed cultural work.

As for opposing 'culture' to wars, we have our homegrown wars, don't worry! The Basij and plain-clothes thugs that beat the hell out of people and torture and kill them are the beneficiaries of that 'culture'.

gorg O'meesh / April 21, 2010 1:25 PM

To the Editor,
Could you please include a link to Part I?
Thanks.

Catherine / April 21, 2010 3:51 PM

Kinda reads like Chicago, IL under Richard Daley in the 1960's. This is about keeping your power base employed and happy more than religion or culture. But it's nice to know even Persian religious types enjoy a good governmental gravy train.

Paul J. Jarzabek / April 21, 2010 7:25 PM

It is good that the author is detailing these kinds of expenditures, but in any economic reporting, one should express these sorts of numbers as percentages of the GDP or of the budget. Absolute figures in rials mean little to an average reader, and such figures (which seem even larger in rials) cannot be understood without such context.

For example, when saying that a certain expenditure quadrupled over the last four years, this exaggerates its increase - the budget went up by almost the same multiple over the last four years as well. So a critic could easily dismiss such remarks by saying the amount spent has not changed at all, relative to the budget. Hopefully, in the future, the author as well as other writers on TB will express spending amounts in both absolute and relative terms - that is responsible reporting.

Kevan / April 21, 2010 8:15 PM

The only thing that is more disgusting than the cancer that is the Islamic Military-Cultural Dictatorship of Iran is the apologists that can't see that green is green, and fascism is fascism.

Behrooz / April 22, 2010 3:32 AM

as you can see the basij have their thugs/servants also available to protect their behavior here.

Farshad / April 22, 2010 5:19 AM

Catherine, link to part I:

Ahmadinejad's Cultural Priorities

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2010/04/ahmadinejads-cultural-priorities.html

Farooz / April 22, 2010 9:05 AM

I finally read the article with the aid of an ENGLISH speaking person. This article is in english, he was very kind to make sure I UNDERSTOOD the point of the article.

Now I can see that a lot of people shoot their mouths (fingers) here without having read the article, of even the title. Or, else, the majority are just morons.

Money WAS NOT spent on culture. It was earmarked as such but diverted to the basij brigades stationed in mosques to help fund these philistines to spy on people and confront their sisters and brothers (in Islamic and non-Islamic terms) if they wanted to express themselves, that is, if they wanted to say "where is my vote?" and, Dearest Leader, how come you eat caviar for breakfast and I can't find descent bread.

Who cares if the US is good or bad, or the French, or the Chinese.

These bastards are RAPING and KILLING. Is that OK if the martians do that too?

Hmmm.., I am not half as bad as Hitler. I am 45% as bad as him. So, I must be OK. I have 5% credit to kill a few thousand more by silent support of these miscreants, because they are like each other.

All this nonsense of relative moral comparisons is to COVER UP for your weak, demented, lazy, irresponsible, and guilty conscious. You sit here in the US, with your sorry donkey protected by the US, and by comparing US and Iran, justify rape, torture, starvation, and murder, on both sides. Shame on all of you.

Mad Hatter / April 22, 2010 4:23 PM

Kevan

Thank you very much. Very good point and I hope it is taken!

gorg O'meesh / April 22, 2010 6:59 PM

The Iranian govertment has been using relations with the US to justify it's defense spending for years. But when you look at what they are spending this money on, it has nothing to do with defending the nation against a foreign threat. The spending is all spent on controlling the people of Iran. Recent views of Iranian military exercises are quite humorous. Instead of addressing the 20% unemployment, the short supply of basic goods etc. the Iranian governtment is more interested in keeping it's own citizens from removing them from their cushy lives, in which the live in luxury off of money stolen from their countrymen who are suffering.

Brianc / April 23, 2010 6:14 PM