Judge Blocks Key Provision of “Gainful Employment” Rules


July 2, 2012
Watch College, Inc., FRONTLINE’s investigation into how for-profit universities are transforming the way we think about college in America, and Educating Sergeant Pantzke, our follow-up film about how the schools recruit veterans.

A federal judge has struck down a Department of Education initiative aimed at improving the quality of degrees issued by for-profit colleges, ruling that a key provision of the department’s “gainful employment” standard was “arbitrary and capricious.”

Under the regulation, which was scheduled to take effect Sunday, career training programs would be ineligible for federal student aid if less than 35 percent of graduates were not in repayment of their loans. The plan was established to ensure students are not overburdened with debt for degrees that are not helping them to find work.

But in an opinion [PDF] issued on Saturday, Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled that the department’s primary benchmark for measuring progress lacked any factual support.

“No expert study or industry standard suggested that the rate selected by the department would appropriately measure whether a particular program adequately prepared its students,” Contreras wrote. “Instead, the department simply explained that the chosen rate would identify the worst-performing quarter of programs.”

The judge further struck down two related benchmarks, saying they were too “intertwined” with the repayment standard to survive. Under those benchmarks, a graduate’s annual loan payments could not exceed 12 percent of their earnings or 30 percent of their discretionary income.

Last week, the Education Department released data showing 193 vocational programs at for-profits — roughly 5 percent of those that would have been subject to the gainful employment rule — failed to meet all three benchmarks.

The for-profit education industry, which had criticized the gainful employment rules as overly burdensome and fought to water down the regulation, claimed the decision as a victory.

“We are very pleased to report nearly all of the regulation’s overreaching elements were vacated,” Steve Gunderson, the president and CEO of the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities, the group that brought the lawsuit, said in a statement.

Still, the decision preserved several key protections for students, including a requirement that institutions disclose their graduation rates to prospective students, as well as their student’s median debt load. While students at for-profit schools represent just 12 percent of all higher education students, they account for 46 percent of all student loan dollars in default.

Moreover, the judge recognized in his opinion that though flawed, gainful employment rules “set out to address a serious policy problem.” In so doing, he left Education Department officials room to revisit the issue.

Next steps remain unclear, though. A department spokesman told Inside Higher Ed that the administration was weighing its options, which the publication suggested could include returning to court to try to provide a better justification for the repayment standard, or rewriting the gainful employment standards in a way that better fits the ruling by Judge Contreras.


Jason M. Breslow

Jason M. Breslow, Digital Editor



In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

U.S. Supreme Court Decision Could Disenfranchise Wisconsin Voters
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision not to extend the absentee ballot deadline in Wisconsin wasn't a surprise to election officials but could disenfranchise thousands of voters in a state with nearly 300,000 absentee ballots outstanding.
October 29, 2020
COVID-19 and the Most Litigated Presidential Election in Recent U.S. History: How the Lawsuits Break Down
A FRONTLINE analysis found that more than 400 election-related cases have been filed in the U.S. this year, making 2020 the most litigated presidential election in recent U.S. history — largely due to concerns involving COVID-19.
October 28, 2020
Trump Stokes Fear in the Suburbs, but Few Low-Income Families Ever Make It There
In an effort to appeal to suburban voters, President Trump has promised to keep low-income housing out of their neighborhoods. But in the 50 years since the Fair Housing Act was passed, families with low incomes have not flooded the suburbs.
October 28, 2020
Cheat Codes: Students Search For Shortcuts as Virtual Schooling Expands
Cheating has always been an issue in schools, but there is little getting in the way for students today. Shared answers have become even more accessible as districts have adopted or expanded their use of popular online learning programs.
October 23, 2020