Maryland Votes to Expand Felons’ Voting Rights

Ex-offender Leroy Jones joins other demonstrators outside court in Miami, Wednesday, April 9, 2003. Jones finished his sentence 10 years earlier. Currently, those with felony convictions in Florida can be permanently disenfranchised.

Ex-offender Leroy Jones joins other demonstrators outside court in Miami, Wednesday, April 9, 2003. Jones finished his sentence 10 years earlier. Currently, those with felony convictions in Florida can be permanently disenfranchised. (AP Photo/J. Pat Carter)

February 9, 2016

Maryland has become the latest state to expand the right to vote to felons who have been released from prison, in the most significant expansion of voting access for ex-offenders in recent years.

The state legislature on Tuesday voted to overturn Gov. Larry Hogan’s veto of a bill granting expanded access to the ballot. Hogan, a Republican, told lawmakers that Maryland law at the time of the veto — which restored voting rights once offenders completed all aspects of their sentence, including parole and probation — was more appropriate. Critics, including some ex-offenders, argued that approach amounted to taxation without representation. The new law restores voting rights immediately upon a prisoner’s release. 

“These are people living in the community,” said Nicole D. Porter, advocacy director at the Sentencing Project, a nonprofit group that works toward criminal justice reform.  “They participate in other areas of the social contract. They are expected not to recidivate. They pay taxes. They want to participate in democracy and should have a role in deciding who represents them.”

The new law is expected to restore the right to vote for an estimated 40,000 people in Maryland, which, once it takes effect next month, should allow them to vote in the state’s April presidential primary election.

Doug Mayer, a spokesman for the governor, said in a statement that lawmakers had “decided to ignore reason and common sense and support an action that the vast majority of Marylanders vehemently oppose.” He added, “For too long, voters have been completely ignored by their elected representatives in Annapolis — it happened again today and our citizens deserve better.”

Nearly six million Americans are unable to vote because of their criminal records, a disproportionate number of whom are African-American. In recent years, as states have begun to push for reforming the criminal justice system, including making it easier for those with criminal records to find jobs and housing, a few have also begun to consider restoring voting rights for those with felony convictions.

But it’s been an uneven process. Currently, most states restrict the right to vote for those with felony convictions until they have completed all aspects of their sentences. And 12 states have laws that can leave ex-offenders permanently stripped of the right to vote.

Only two states — Maine and Vermont — impose no restrictions on felons’ right to vote, even when they’re in prison.

Since 2010, only two states have passed laws to restore voting rights to some with criminal records.

Delaware dropped its five-year waiting period for those seeking to have their rights restored in 2013. Wyoming, where most felons lose their right to vote permanently, enacted a law last year to restore voting rights to some non-violent offenders upon their release from prison. 

More have restricted felons’ access to the ballot. Florida, Iowa, Tennessee, South Dakota and South Carolina have scaled back rights for felons in recent years. Last year, Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear, a Democrat, issued an executive order that automatically restored felons’ right to vote, but it was rescinded by the current Republican governor, Matt Bevin.

That trend may be starting to change. So far this year, Porter said, lawmakers in Minnesota, Alabama and Kentucky are considering bills that would expand voting rights for ex-offenders.

This story has been updated.

Sarah Childress

Sarah Childress, Senior Editor & Director of Local Projects, FRONTLINE



In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

Wisconsin Recount Targets 2 Democratic Strongholds, Home to Black and Hispanic Voters
Unlike other places, where the Trump campaign has pursued statewide recounts, the Wisconsin request was limited to Dane and Milwaukee Counties, where Biden held solid leads.
November 25, 2020
7 New Documentaries to Watch over Thanksgiving Break in 2020
Plus, one new podcast to listen to.
November 25, 2020
‘I'm Not A Monster’: Who's Who from the Podcast
Meet the key players in 'I Am Not A Monster,' a special podcast series on how an American mother ended up in the heart of ISIS' self-declared caliphate.
November 24, 2020
On Night of Ginsburg’s Death, McConnell Pushed Trump to Nominate Amy Coney Barrett
An excerpt from FRONTLINE’s ‘Supreme Revenge: Battle for the Court’ goes inside Sen. McConnell’s swift maneuvering to achieve a 6-3 conservative majority.
November 24, 2020