|
Missing in MiG Alley
|
|
Classroom Activity
|
Activity Summary
Students
research technological advances, tactical strategies, and roles aircraft have
played in the United States' five major international conflicts of the 20th
century.
Learning Objectives
Students will be able to:
- copy of the "Historian Fact Sheet" student handout
(PDF or
HTML)
Part I
- copy of the "The Changing Face of War" student handout
(PDF or
HTML)
- sheets of white drawing paper
- white poster paper
- assorted colored pencils, pens, and
markers
- glue sticks or tape
- access to print and Internet resources
Background
During
the 20th century, the United States was involved in five major
international conflicts (not including the Cold War): World War I, World War
II, the Korean War, the Vietnam Conflict, and the Persian Gulf War. The outcome
of each one of those wars depended on a number of factors, including the
combatants involved, the number of armed forces engaged, the technologies
employed, the campaign strategies applied, and the politics and policies of the
time.
In
this activity, students explore the details of each war and consider how
changing technology has impacted how wars have been fought over time.
Organize students into five teams, one for each of the wars listed below:
- World War I
- World War II
- Korean War
- Vietnam Conflict
- Persian Gulf War
Distribute the student handout and other materials (cut up the teacher handout
that lists the statistics for each war and provide each group with the
statistics for its war). Review the student handout with the class and explain
the roles for the completion of the classroom project. Assign or have team members
choose roles.
Have students conduct research in each of their assigned roles: historian,
technologist, airplane specialist, and operational methods specialist. Each
team member should create a poster containing research learned about his or her
role for the war he or she has been assigned.
Have each team member present a poster about his or her role, either presenting
by role across the five wars or having each role presented for one war before
moving onto the next war.
After all teams have presented, have a class discussion to compare and contrast
technologies across all of the wars and to consider the impact technology has
had on how wars are fought. What were the most striking technological
developments? How did these changes affect tactical strategies? What
technologies helped cut down on human casualties? How has the role of aircraft
changed over the course of the five wars?
As an extension, have students research and create posters on everyday
technologies that resulted from technological innovations that occurred during
wartime.
Historians
Students will create bar charts using supplied statistics, and provide basic facts about
each war.
Technologists
The
following is a partial list of major
technologies introduced or refined by each war:
World
War I: aircraft (used mainly for
reconnaissance and to adjust artillery fire), heavy artillery, poison
gas (i.e., phosgene and mustard), submarine warfare, battlefield tanks,
field telephone and radio
World
War II: combat aircraft (used in
strategic bombing of targets), transport aircraft, airborne warfare
(paratroopers, gliders, and aircraft carriers), mechanized warfare (armored and
mechanized divisions on suitable terrain), nuclear weapons, cruise missiles and
ballistic missiles (V-1 and V-2), radar, sonar, electronic computers (most
importantly for code breaking), antibiotics, napalm, radios and movies (for
public information and propaganda)
Korean
War: helicopters (for casualty
evacuation and combat rescue), jet aircraft
Vietnam
Conflict: helicopters, guided
missiles, bio-chemical warfare (Agent Orange), television (for public
information and propaganda)
Persian
Gulf War: smart bombs, global
positioning system, stealth aircraft, satellite communications
Airplane Specialists
Soon
after the beginning of the 20th century, many nations used aircraft
for reconnaissance. The technical advancement generated by World War I led to
the development of specialized reconnaissance aircraft, and later fighters and
bombers. World War II witnessed the development of strategic bombing and of the
earliest jet fighters. The Korean War pitted American
and Soviet pilots in history's first jet-vs.-jet war, while helicopters
were deployed to evacuate the wounded and rescue downed pilots. During the Vietnam Conflict, aerial bombing was used to put
diplomatic pressure on the enemy, to interdict the flow of supplies, and to
provide close support to ground troops. In the first Persian Gulf War, fighters
(especially the stealth fighter) were used as first-strike weapons before
ground troops entered the combat zone. This strategy sought to break Iraqi resistance
before infantry invaded.
Over
time, as aircraft attained higher speeds and armament proved more powerful,
aerial engagements rapidly changed from close-in dogfights to long-range
missile duels. The advent of computer-guided
missiles in the 1950s allowed pilots to be more
selective in their targets. Modern laser-guided bombs
use the accuracy of the global positioning system
to guide weapons to within a few feet of their targets.
The introduction of radar bombing systems during World
War II made night bombing more accurate, and steady improvements in the 1950s
and 1960s permitted precision radar bombing. The introduction of radar and
infrared guided air-to-air missiles in the 1960s allowed for long-range missile
engagements. At the same time, the adoption of laser- and television-guided
bombs permitted unprecedented bombing accuracy. With the advent of guidance
systems using remote inputs from global positioning system satellites in the
1990s, this accuracy could be achieved without visual contact with the target.
The following table lists some of the airplanes used in each war.
War/Conflict
|
Aircraft*
|
Nation
|
Speed (mph)
|
World War I
|
Sopwith Camel (1917)
|
Great Britain
|
118
|
|
Royal Aircraft Factory S.E. 5 (1917)
|
Great Britain
|
138
|
|
Fokker DR.I Triplane (1917)
|
Germany
|
103
|
|
Fokker D.VII (1918)
|
Germany
|
118
|
|
Albatros D.III (1917)
|
Germany
|
109
|
|
Nieuport XVII (1916)
|
France
|
110
|
|
Spad S.XIII (1917)
|
France
|
138
|
World War II
|
Messerschmitt Bf 109 (1935)
|
Germany
|
358
|
|
Focke-Wulf Fw 190 (1941)
|
Germany
|
426
|
|
Messerschmitt Me 262 (1944)
|
Germany
|
540
|
|
North American P-51 (1940)
|
USA
|
437
|
|
Grumman F6F (1943)
|
USA
|
380
|
|
Lockheed P-38 (1939)
|
USA
|
414
|
|
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 (1941)
|
USSR
|
398
|
|
Yakovlev Yak-9 (1943)
|
USSR
|
434
|
|
Mitsubishi A6M Zero-Sen (1942)
|
Japan
|
354
|
|
Supermarine Spitfire (1938)
|
Great Britain
|
369
|
|
Hawker Hurricane Mk. I (1937)
|
Great Britain
|
318
|
Korean War
|
North American F-86 Sabre (1949)
|
USA
|
690
|
|
MiG-15 (1947)
|
USSR
|
668
|
Vietnam Conflict
|
F-4 Phantom (1962)
|
USA
|
1,485
|
|
MiG-21 (1960)
|
North Vietnam
|
1,353
|
|
F-105 (1961)
|
USA
|
1,390
|
Persian Gulf War
|
F-15 (1975)
|
USA
|
1,875
|
|
F-117 (1982)
|
USA
|
646
|
|
MiG-25 (1972)
|
Iraq
|
1,848
|
*
Dates indicate initial year of service for aircraft.
Operational Methods
War
|
Strategy
|
Strategy
Defined
|
Nation
|
World War I
|
Schlieffen
Plan
|
attack
plan to encircle Paris through Belgium; was implemented and failed; abandoned
in 1914
|
Germany
|
|
attrition
and trench warfare
|
forcing
opponent to expend lives for small gains
|
embraced
by Germany in 1915, then by other industrialized nations
|
|
total
war involving civilian populations
|
destruction
of non-military and non-strategic positions; destruction of resources, human
and economic
|
embraced
by totalitarian powers
|
|
alliances
and coalitions
|
Triple
Entente and Triple Alliance (alliances that dominated Western European
diplomatic history until World War I)
|
successfully
adopted by German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, but misuse led to catastrophe
in August 1914
|
World
War II
|
island
hopping
|
bypassing
key Japanese Pacific strongholds (1942–45)
|
United
States
|
|
massed
tank formations
|
large-scale
armor-only attacks with infantry support
|
heavily
used by Germans
|
|
air
superiority
|
use of
fighter aircraft to secure control of the air for reconnaissance,
bombardment, and ground attack
|
fighter
aircraft first invented by French in 1915, and adopted by the Germans and
other warring powers in subsequent wars
|
|
terror
bombing of cities
|
use of
massed bombing formations to sow terror
|
used
by Germans and Japanese in the 1930s
|
|
strategic
high-altitude precision bombardment
|
destruction
of selected industrial and military targets by massed formations of
high-altitude bombers
|
developed
by United States in the 1920s; applied in World War II
|
|
night
bombardment of cities
|
use of
darkness to protect bombers from fighter attack
|
used first
by the Germans against Britain, then by the British against Germany, and
finally the United States against Japan
|
|
lightning
war, aka blitzkrieg
|
coordinated
combined arms attacks using tanks and mechanized infantry and artillery with
air support
|
first
used by the Germans in 1939–40; later adopted by Western allies
|
|
wolf
packs
|
submarines
working as large teams for massed attacks
|
adopted
by the Germans in World War II
|
|
kamikaze
|
aerial
suicide attacks against primarily naval targets
|
Japan
|
Korean
War
|
containment
|
checking spread of
communism by intervention
|
American
policy to limit the scope of the conflict to the peninsula
|
|
human wave
|
massed infantry attacks in
close formation against defenses
|
China
|
Vietnam
Conflict
|
Americanization
|
U.S.
assumption of the primary military role in March 1965
|
introduction
of U.S. ground troops on March 8, 1965
|
|
defoliation
|
use of
chemical agents to selectively destroy ground cover (to deny cover for
ambushes) and to destroy crops
|
United
States in Vietnam from 1962–71
|
|
carpet
bombing
|
high-tonnage
bomb drops, in waves, on small areas, typically to pave the way for the
advance of ground forces
|
used
by the Americans against the North Vietnamese
|
Persian
Gulf War
|
envelopment
|
encirclement
of enemy to create an indefensible "pocket"
|
American
tactic to avoid most fixed defenses
|
|
"Hail
Mary" sweep
|
high-speed
end-around maneuver by armored divisions
|
formulated
by American general Norman Schwarzkopf
|
Web Sites
NOVA—Missing in MiG Alley
www.pbs.org/nova/warplanes
Learn about G forces, find out how the United States looks for
missing war personnel, compare the MiG and Sabre, and outfit a fighter pilot in
this companion Web site.
American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics
www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf
Presents
a comprehensive list of military personnel serving in, and casualties reported
for, major wars and selected military operations waged by the United States.
History of Warplanes
Techcenter.Davidson.kiz.nc.us/fall03/1stgroup/index.htm
Outlines
the planes used in major conflicts, with photos, statistics, and time lines.
Statistical Summary: America's Major Wars
www.cwc.lsu.edu/cwc/other/stats/warcost.htm
Compares
the vital statistics of all major American conflicts, including number of
troops, casualties, and financial costs.
Wars & World History-Homework Center-Multnomah County Library
www.multcolib.org/homework/warwldhc.html
Offers
a search portal on wars and world history, with information on technology,
statistics, and time lines.
Books
Air Power in the Age of Total War
by
John Buckley. Indiana
University Press, 1999.
Analyzes
the changing military role of air power in the 20th century and examines the
impact of World War I, the theories and planning in the interwar period,
the air arms race, World War II in Europe and the Far East, and the post-war
period.
MiG Alley: Sabres vs. MiGs over Korea
by Warren E. Thompson and David R. McLaren. Speciality Press, 2002.
Includes
several in-depth interviews with F-86 pilots, who explain their tactics and the
details of air combat against MiG pilots.
Sabres over MiG Alley
by Kenneth P. Werrell. Naval Institute Press, 2005.
Provides
a comprehensive analysis of the F-86 and how UN pilots, initially outnumbered,
redefined aerial strategies and won a decisive victory.
The "The Changing Face of War" activity aligns with the following National
Science Education Standards (see
books.nap.edu/html/nses).
Grades 5-8
Science and Technology
• Abilities of technological design
Grades 9-12
Science and Technology
• Abilities of technological design
Classroom Activity Author
Steven Branting has served
as a consultant for gifted and innovative programs in Lewiston, Idaho, public
schools for more than 30 years. Branting and his students have won
international awards for their work in physics, engineering, geographic
information systems, and historical preservation.
|
|