|
Missing in MiG Alley
|
|
Classroom Activity
|
Activity Summary
Students research technological advances, tactical strategies, and
roles aircraft have played in the United States' five major
international conflicts of the 20th
century.
Learning Objectives
Students will be able to:
-
copy of the "Historian Fact Sheet" student handout
(PDF
or
HTML)
Part I
-
copy of the "The Changing Face of War" student handout
(PDF
or
HTML)
- sheets of white drawing paper
- white poster paper
- assorted colored pencils, pens, and markers
- glue sticks or tape
- access to print and Internet resources
Background
During the 20th century, the United States was involved
in five major international conflicts (not including the Cold War):
World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam Conflict, and
the Persian Gulf War. The outcome of each one of those wars depended
on a number of factors, including the combatants involved, the
number of armed forces engaged, the technologies employed, the
campaign strategies applied, and the politics and policies of the
time.
In this activity, students explore the details of each war and
consider how changing technology has impacted how wars have been
fought over time.
-
Organize students into five teams, one for each of the wars
listed below:
- World War I
- World War II
- Korean War
- Vietnam Conflict
- Persian Gulf War
-
Distribute the student handout and other materials (cut up the
teacher handout that lists the statistics for each war and
provide each group with the statistics for its war). Review the
student handout with the class and explain the roles for the
completion of the classroom project. Assign or have team members
choose roles.
-
Have students conduct research in each of their assigned roles:
historian, technologist, airplane specialist, and operational
methods specialist. Each team member should create a poster
containing research learned about his or her role for the war he
or she has been assigned.
-
Have each team member present a poster about his or her role,
either presenting by role across the five wars or having each
role presented for one war before moving onto the next war.
-
After all teams have presented, have a class discussion to
compare and contrast technologies across all of the wars and to
consider the impact technology has had on how wars are fought.
What were the most striking technological developments? How did
these changes affect tactical strategies? What technologies
helped cut down on human casualties? How has the role of
aircraft changed over the course of the five wars?
-
As an extension, have students research and create posters on
everyday technologies that resulted from technological
innovations that occurred during wartime.
Historians
Students will create bar charts using supplied statistics, and
provide basic facts about each war.
Technologists
The following is a partial list of major technologies introduced or
refined by each war:
-
World War I: aircraft (used mainly for reconnaissance and
to adjust artillery fire), heavy artillery, poison gas (i.e.,
phosgene and mustard), submarine warfare, battlefield tanks,
field telephone and radio
-
World War II: combat aircraft (used in strategic bombing
of targets), transport aircraft, airborne warfare (paratroopers,
gliders, and aircraft carriers), mechanized warfare (armored and
mechanized divisions on suitable terrain), nuclear weapons,
cruise missiles and ballistic missiles (V-1 and V-2), radar,
sonar, electronic computers (most importantly for code
breaking), antibiotics, napalm, radios and movies (for public
information and propaganda)
-
Korean War: helicopters (for casualty evacuation and
combat rescue), jet aircraft
-
Vietnam Conflict: helicopters, guided missiles,
bio-chemical warfare (Agent Orange), television (for public
information and propaganda)
-
Persian Gulf War: smart bombs, global positioning system,
stealth aircraft, satellite communications
Airplane Specialists
Soon after the beginning of the 20th century, many
nations used aircraft for reconnaissance. The technical advancement
generated by World War I led to the development of specialized
reconnaissance aircraft, and later fighters and bombers. World War
II witnessed the development of strategic bombing and of the
earliest jet fighters. The Korean War pitted American and Soviet
pilots in history's first jet-vs.-jet war, while helicopters were
deployed to evacuate the wounded and rescue downed pilots. During
the Vietnam Conflict, aerial bombing was used to put diplomatic
pressure on the enemy, to interdict the flow of supplies, and to
provide close support to ground troops. In the first Persian Gulf
War, fighters (especially the stealth fighter) were used as
first-strike weapons before ground troops entered the combat zone.
This strategy sought to break Iraqi resistance before infantry
invaded.
Over time, as aircraft attained higher speeds and armament proved
more powerful, aerial engagements rapidly changed from close-in
dogfights to long-range missile duels. The advent of computer-guided
missiles in the 1950s allowed pilots to be more selective in their
targets. Modern laser-guided bombs use the accuracy of the global
positioning system to guide weapons to within a few feet of their
targets.
The introduction of radar bombing systems during World War II made
night bombing more accurate, and steady improvements in the 1950s
and 1960s permitted precision radar bombing. The introduction of
radar and infrared guided air-to-air missiles in the 1960s allowed
for long-range missile engagements. At the same time, the adoption
of laser- and television-guided bombs permitted unprecedented
bombing accuracy. With the advent of guidance systems using remote
inputs from global positioning system satellites in the 1990s, this
accuracy could be achieved without visual contact with the target.
The following table lists some of the airplanes used in each war.
War/Conflict
|
Aircraft*
|
Nation
|
Speed (mph)
|
World War I
|
Sopwith Camel (1917)
|
Great Britain
|
118
|
|
Royal Aircraft Factory S.E. 5 (1917)
|
Great Britain
|
138
|
|
Fokker DR.I Triplane (1917)
|
Germany
|
103
|
|
Fokker D.VII (1918)
|
Germany
|
118
|
|
Albatros D.III (1917)
|
Germany
|
109
|
|
Nieuport XVII (1916)
|
France
|
110
|
|
Spad S.XIII (1917)
|
France
|
138
|
World War II
|
Messerschmitt Bf 109 (1935)
|
Germany
|
358
|
|
Focke-Wulf Fw 190 (1941)
|
Germany
|
426
|
|
Messerschmitt Me 262 (1944)
|
Germany
|
540
|
|
North American P-51 (1940)
|
USA
|
437
|
|
Grumman F6F (1943)
|
USA
|
380
|
|
Lockheed P-38 (1939)
|
USA
|
414
|
|
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 (1941)
|
USSR
|
398
|
|
Yakovlev Yak-9 (1943)
|
USSR
|
434
|
|
Mitsubishi A6M Zero-Sen (1942)
|
Japan
|
354
|
|
Supermarine Spitfire (1938)
|
Great Britain
|
369
|
|
Hawker Hurricane Mk. I (1937)
|
Great Britain
|
318
|
Korean War
|
North American F-86 Sabre (1949)
|
USA
|
690
|
|
MiG-15 (1947)
|
USSR
|
668
|
Vietnam Conflict
|
F-4 Phantom (1962)
|
USA
|
1,485
|
|
MiG-21 (1960)
|
North Vietnam
|
1,353
|
|
F-105 (1961)
|
USA
|
1,390
|
Persian Gulf War
|
F-15 (1975)
|
USA
|
1,875
|
|
F-117 (1982)
|
USA
|
646
|
|
MiG-25 (1972)
|
Iraq
|
1,848
|
* Dates indicate initial year of service for aircraft.
Operational Methods
War
|
Strategy
|
Strategy Defined
|
Nation
|
World War I
|
Schlieffen Plan
|
attack plan to encircle Paris through Belgium; was implemented
and failed; abandoned in 1914
|
Germany
|
|
attrition and trench warfare
|
forcing opponent to expend lives for small gains
|
embraced by Germany in 1915, then by other industrialized
nations
|
|
total war involving civilian populations
|
destruction of non-military and non-strategic positions;
destruction of resources, human and economic
|
embraced by totalitarian powers
|
|
alliances and coalitions
|
Triple Entente and Triple Alliance (alliances that dominated
Western European diplomatic history until World War I)
|
successfully adopted by German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck,
but misuse led to catastrophe in August 1914
|
World War II
|
island hopping
|
bypassing key Japanese Pacific strongholds (1942–45)
|
United States
|
|
massed tank formations
|
large-scale armor-only attacks with infantry support
|
heavily used by Germans
|
|
air superiority
|
use of fighter aircraft to secure control of the air for
reconnaissance, bombardment, and ground attack
|
fighter aircraft first invented by French in 1915, and adopted
by the Germans and other warring powers in subsequent wars
|
|
terror bombing of cities
|
use of massed bombing formations to sow terror
|
used by Germans and Japanese in the 1930s
|
|
strategic high-altitude precision bombardment
|
destruction of selected industrial and military targets by
massed formations of high-altitude bombers
|
developed by United States in the 1920s; applied in World War
II
|
|
night bombardment of cities
|
use of darkness to protect bombers from fighter attack
|
used first by the Germans against Britain, then by the British
against Germany, and finally the United States against Japan
|
|
lightning war, aka blitzkrieg
|
coordinated combined arms attacks using tanks and mechanized
infantry and artillery with air support
|
first used by the Germans in 1939–40; later adopted by
Western allies
|
|
wolf packs
|
submarines working as large teams for massed attacks
|
adopted by the Germans in World War II
|
|
kamikaze
|
aerial suicide attacks against primarily naval targets
|
Japan
|
Korean War
|
containment
|
checking spread of communism by intervention
|
American policy to limit the scope of the conflict to the
peninsula
|
|
human wave
|
massed infantry attacks in close formation against defenses
|
China
|
Vietnam Conflict
|
Americanization
|
U.S. assumption of the primary military role in March 1965
|
introduction of U.S. ground troops on March 8, 1965
|
|
defoliation
|
use of chemical agents to selectively destroy ground cover (to
deny cover for ambushes) and to destroy crops
|
United States in Vietnam from 1962–71
|
|
carpet bombing
|
high-tonnage bomb drops, in waves, on small areas, typically
to pave the way for the advance of ground forces
|
used by the Americans against the North Vietnamese
|
Persian Gulf War
|
envelopment
|
encirclement of enemy to create an indefensible "pocket"
|
American tactic to avoid most fixed defenses
|
|
"Hail Mary" sweep
|
high-speed end-around maneuver by armored divisions
|
formulated by American general Norman Schwarzkopf
|
Web Sites
NOVA—Missing in MiG Alley
www.pbs.org/nova/warplanes
Learn about G forces, find out how the United States looks for
missing war personnel, compare the MiG and Sabre, and outfit a
fighter pilot in this companion Web site.
American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and
Statistics
www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf
Presents a comprehensive list of military personnel serving in, and
casualties reported for, major wars and selected military operations
waged by the United States.
History of Warplanes
Techcenter.Davidson.kiz.nc.us/fall03/1stgroup/index.htm
Outlines the planes used in major conflicts, with photos,
statistics, and time lines.
Statistical Summary: America's Major Wars
www.cwc.lsu.edu/cwc/other/stats/warcost.htm
Compares the vital statistics of all major American conflicts,
including number of troops, casualties, and financial costs.
Wars & World History-Homework Center-Multnomah County Library
www.multcolib.org/homework/warwldhc.html
Offers a search portal on wars and world history, with information
on technology, statistics, and time lines.
Books
Air Power in the Age of Total War
by John Buckley. Indiana University Press, 1999.
Analyzes the changing military role of air power in the 20th century
and examines the impact of World War I, the theories and planning in
the interwar period, the air arms race, World War II in Europe and
the Far East, and the post-war period.
MiG Alley: Sabres vs. MiGs over Korea
by Warren E. Thompson and David R. McLaren. Speciality Press,
2002.
Includes several in-depth interviews with F-86 pilots, who explain
their tactics and the details of air combat against MiG pilots.
Sabres over MiG Alley
by Kenneth P. Werrell. Naval Institute Press, 2005.
Provides a comprehensive analysis of the F-86 and how UN pilots,
initially outnumbered, redefined aerial strategies and won a
decisive victory.
The "The Changing Face of War" activity aligns with the following
National Science Education Standards (see
books.nap.edu/html/nses).
Grades 5-8
Science and Technology
• Abilities of technological design
Grades 9-12
Science and Technology
• Abilities of technological design
Classroom Activity Author
Steven Branting has served as a consultant for gifted and innovative
programs in Lewiston, Idaho, public schools for more than 30 years.
Branting and his students have won international awards for their
work in physics, engineering, geographic information systems, and
historical preservation.
|
|