![]() In the News: The Immigration DebateFollow @GretchenMargSeptember 29, 2011, 4:31 pm ET We’re preparing for Lost in Detention — our upcoming film on immigration airing Oct. 18 (check local listings) — and have been keeping our eye on a number of related stories in the news this week: + Nearly 3,000 arrested in crackdown on immigrants with criminal records: This summer, the Obama administration announced it would prioritize (PDF) the arrest and deportation of illegal immigrants who “pose a danger to national security or a risk to public safety,” as well as repeat immigration violators. Yesterday, it made good on that promise, announcing that nearly 3,000 “convicted criminal aliens” had been arrested during a nationwide, week-long operation by ICE’s Fugitive Operations program. Among those arrested: + 1,600 had been convicted of felonies, ranging from manslaughter to drug trafficking to sexual crimes against minors This summer’s shift in policy came amidst criticism (from social justice groups and state officials alike) that the administration’s highly publicized Secure Communities program — a new high-tech way of tracking immigration violators via fingerprint data — is sowing fear and deporting low-level offenders (or people without records at all). + Alabama’s Tough Immigration Law Upheld: On Wednesday, Federal District Court Judge Sharon Blackburn upheld much of the state’s new immigration policy, which was signed into law by Gov. Robert Bentley [R] in June, and is considered to be the strictest in the nation. The Justice Department had challenged the statute, known as HB-56, arguing it goes far beyond federal guidelines. Among its requirements: + Police must determine the immigration status of anyone they came across who they suspect might not be a U.S. citizen Though the judge blocked parts of the law pertaining to “harboring or transporting” undocumented immigrants and preventing them from enrolling in public universities, the most controversial aspect of the law — allowing officers to verify a person’s legal status during routine traffic stops — is still on the books. But the ruling does not seem to have deterred the Justice Department; The Washington Post reports today that it’s considering taking the “extraordinary step” of challenging similar laws in four other states — Utah, Georgia, Indiana and South Carolina. Update [10/07/11]: The U.S. Justice Department today asked a federal appeals court to halt the enforcement of the Alabama law, claiming it “is highly likely to expose persons lawfully in the United States, including school children, to new difficulties in routine dealings.” + Inside Private Detention Centers: Today New York Times reporter Nina Bernstein looked at the lucrative business of private detention centers, who are capitalizing on immigration crackdowns around the world. One striking stat:
For background, read Tom Barry’s extensive 2009 Boston Review investigation into the public-private immigration detention centers in the U.S. Photo: Suspects wait to be transported during a 2007 pre-dawn raid by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials in Santa Ana, Calif. (AP/Mark Avery) RELATED
|
SUPPORT PROVIDED BY RECENT STORIES
|
FRONTLINE Watch FRONTLINE About FRONTLINE Contact FRONTLINE
Privacy Policy Journalistic Guidelines PBS Privacy Policy PBS Terms of Use Corporate Sponsorship
FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2014 WGBH Educational Foundation
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:
Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.