1998 | ||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
||||
GREENFIELD: Well, the issue of a candidate's money is a really complicated one. I think you can set a general rule down, that is, the expenditure of large sums of your own money rarely hurts. It has to be linked to something else. For instance, Michael Huffington's case, it was linked to the absolute lack of credentials. He just seemed to be a real lightweight who was just going to spend his way into, into office--and almost succeeded. I think in Checchi's case, it was the sudden negative turn of his campaign when he began to lose. Checchi was the frontrunner having spent a lot of money. Then, another wealthy candidate entered the race, Jane Harman and promptly surged to the lead and he immediately began to attack her. I think at that point the public made two judgments: "Okay, maybe Jane Harman isn't the one we want, but here's a guy with unlimited resources who seems to be spending it attacking someone else." Much the same thing happened to Steve Forbes back in '96 when his campaign commercials hurt Bob Dole and then wound up hurting himself because people said, "Now that you have all this money, what are you telling us?"
|