Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
I, Cringely - The Survival of the Nerdiest with Robert X. Cringely
Search I,Cringely:

The Pulpit
The Pulpit

<< [ Risk Is for Losers ]   |  The Final Days of Google  |   [ Still Crazy After All These Years ] >>

Weekly Column

The Final Days of Google: It is going to be an inside job.

Status: [CLOSED] comments (157)
By Robert X. Cringely
bob@cringely.com

Back in the 1990s Bill Gates said the company that would eventually beat Microsoft probably had yet to be founded, by which he meant that Microsoft was in such a strong position that only something truly disruptive -- a whole new business -- would have a chance to unseat Redmond. Some people think the company Bill was describing back then might be Google. I don't know if that's the case or not, but it leads me to ask this question: If Google, itself, is to be eventually beaten by some other company, does THAT company yet exist? I don't think so. But unlike the scenario envisioned by Gates, I have a pretty good idea where we'll find the founders of that Google-beating start-up. I think they are working right now at Google.

Google is an amazing entrepreneurial petri dish. Yet at the same time, it is doomed to disappoint nearly every entrepreneurial type who works there. This is key: Google is sowing the seeds of its own eventual destruction. It can't help doing so.

For those who don't know these details or have forgotten them, here's the simple background: Google has made a huge effort to hire the best technical people it can find. Thousands of PhDs are now working in various Google labs, and many of these people were hired from other successful businesses. Google has also acquired a number of smaller companies, many of them for either their technology or their technical talent, and these companies bring yet more entrepreneurial DNA into the mix. The company has created a potent combination of straight-from-university geniuses, straight-from-start-up geniuses, and straight-from-Microsoft/IBM/Yahoo/wherever geniuses. These bright folks work individually and in teams and 20 percent of their time is supposed to be devoted to pursuing new technical ideas of their own. Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page are sure (and for good reason) that their crew will generate in this 20 percent time thousands of ideas and technologies that the company can commercialize for decades to come.

It is a brilliant strategy and one that would appear to be almost foolproof. Alas, that's not so, for Google's strategy for business immortality is fatally flawed and will ultimately kill the company.

The flaw is simple and is composed of three parts. First there are those thousands of ideas and technologies that are being developed by Google employees in the 20 percent of their week devoted specifically for that purpose. That number of new ideas is far too high to be practical and too high even to be considered safe.

Say the Google Geniuses come up with 4,000 business ideas or technologies per year, which is probably around the current number. Let's guess that one percent of these ideas are truly great -- boffo ideas that one could easily build a company around. That's 40 world-beating ideas. And after the 40 absolutely top ideas, let's say there are another 360 ideas that are pretty darned good -- certainly good enough to pitch to the venture capitalists on Sand Hill Road. The remaining 3,600 ideas are, of course, crap, and can be forgotten by everyone except their inventors, whom I'll get back to in a minute.

Assuming Google executives have the insight to know which of their 4,000 proffered ideas are world-class, they then have to decide which 40 to pursue. Such an assumption is giving even Google too much credit, believe me. No matter how smart they are, issues of loyalty, prejudice, and the odd hangover will result in some less-good ideas making it through but mainly great ideas being eliminated. But this doesn't really matter because the larger question is: How many good ideas can Google pursue vigorously per year? The number isn't 40. It isn't even 20. The number of ideas that a company the size of Google can throw all its weight behind per year is about 10, of which five will probably not be the right ones.

Google is no different from any other big tech company in this respect. Go to ANY Google competitor and ask top management how many $100 million new ideas can they afford to pursue this year, not so much in terms of money but in terms of mindshare and human resources. The number will always be in single digits. Allowing 10 projects for Google is giving the company the benefit of the doubt.

Google quite properly will pursue 10 projects per year and five of those will fail both because they are expected to and also because they were never worth pursuing in the first place. This leaves 390 orphaned projects of which 35 are absolutely stunning but unrecognized and 355 are pretty darned good. What happens to THOSE ideas?

They fester.

Google has designed a working environment that provides almost everything their technical people need except a guaranteed sense of satisfaction. By design each worker is no more than 100 feet from a bathroom or food and drink (at Google the food is always free). This creates an environment where people tend not to go home, which Microsoft discovered and leveraged decades ago. But nobody works every minute they are AT work, which means the Google Geeks are constantly talking with each other, team building, bonding, and goofing off. And for 20 percent of that goofing-off time I'll guarantee you that many of these people are discussing their pet projects, 99.75 percent of which have been REJECTED by the company.

While it is possible that a few Google Geeks may talk about how lucky they were to have been saved from their own bad idea, most of them will take exactly the opposite approach, seeing the company as misguided.

Now a word about stock options and vesting. Google employees get stock options that vest over a period of four years. In any high-tech company there is an employee change of attitude that comes with being fully vested. At Microsoft in the 1980s some people wore buttons that said "FYIFV," which stood for "F**k You I'm Fully Vested." At companies that have gone public, as Google has, there is often also an outflow of employees around that four-year anniversary. We'll see that at Google, too, no matter how cushy it is to work there.

Google has even made it easier for its employees to leave the company by instituting a program in partnership with Morgan Stanley where Google employees can sell their vested, but unexercised stock options. There are instances where the intrinsic value of a stock option (the strike price compared to the current share price) places those shares "under water," meaning they would appear to have a negative value. At other companies employees who want to leave simply walk away from these options, leaving them unexercised. But the program at Google allows employees to sell their unexercised options for the difference between their intrinsic (sometimes negative) value and their "time value" -- the presumed value at the time the options expire, typically five years after vesting. Time nearly always has value when it comes to Google shares (the question being asked is, "Will the Google share price be higher than it is today at any point between now and when the options expire in X years?"). Of course the price will be higher, so the options have positive value, often $100 or more per share, even when the stock is down a bit.

With hundreds -- and soon thousands -- of Google employees vested and solvent, we'll shortly see a dribble, then a river, then a flood of former Google employees with time, money, and experience, and some of them will have the drive to realize the dreams of those thousands of ideas that were rejected by their former company.

Of course good ideas alone are not enough. There are always plenty of good ideas. The real money is in taking existing ideas and twisting the idea just far enough to make it work in a fantastic new way. Think Google vs. AltaVista; Apple vs. all previously existing laptops and mp3 players; YouTube vs. all previously existing video sites, etc. In addition to ideas, you need creativity, resources, connections, and luck -- none of which appear to be in short supply among Google worker bees.

Much of the next influx of ideas to Sand Hill Road will come not just from former Google employees, but also from groups of former Google employees who are planning their future companies over free sushi and Diet Coke late at night in Google cafeterias. And based on the quality of the thinkers and the likelihood that Google will have missed at least half of the best ideas, the founders of the next Google are eating yellowtail tonight.

Comments from the Tribe

Status: [CLOSED] read all comments (157)

I would be extremely surprised if Google employees were not subject to an invention assignment agreement.

David | Jun 04, 2007 | 1:12PM

Google could mitigate bad feelings in their employees by not rejecting their pet projects outright. Instead they could phrase it like "we have decided to pursue these 10 projects in the next year. We may decide on your project in the future, so don't be discouraged."

This could string employees along for a while, so they can hope to be one day tied to a successful Google enterprise. The same concept keeps gamblers at the table and people buying lottery tickets.

As far as Google having IP rights on all submitted ideas, they probably do. But reforms that are threatening to occur in patent law may give people a loophole. Or, they may just have to cut Google in on some of the loot if the project succeeds externally.

Remember Rob Glaser founded Real after his idea was rejected by MS. He was able to prove that the idea was sound, only to be beaten down later by MS' tremendous "why pay when we give it away!" warchest. Maybe that's because he couldn't secure exclusivity, having already submitted the concept of streaming media to MS while he was employed by them.

JohnE | Jun 05, 2007 | 4:16PM

You make some really good points, but what about NDA's? The ideas that Google employees are allowed to work on in that 20% time have to be approved ideas, and I wouldn't be surprised if employees are forced to sign some kind of NDA before their idea becomes approved to work on.

In fact I would bet that Google requires all emplyees to sign an agreement that all "inventions" they come up with while being employed at Google are automatically property of Google.

So basically, what I'm getting at, is the act of mentioning your idea to Google (as a Google employee) automatically transfers that idea into Google possesion, and you'll never be able to execute it once leaving the company without some kind of legal agreement.

Remember, Google isn't stupid, they are going for global domination.

Chris Pietschmann | Jun 06, 2007 | 2:16PM