Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

Online NewsHourThe web site of The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer
The John Roberts ConfirmationJohn Roberts and President George Bush
ON THE NEWSHOUR

John Roberts taking oath of office as chief justiceSeptember 29, 2005
John Roberts Becomes Chief Justice of the United States
John Roberts, a conservative jurist who faced three straight days of questioning from skeptical Democratic senators, was sworn in as the nation's 17th chief justice Thursday only hours after winning Senate approval.

All of the Senate Republicans joined half of the body's Democrats in voting 78-22 to approve the 50 year old, in a move hailed by President Bush.

"The Senate has confirmed a man with an astute mind and kind heart," President Bush said just before Roberts was sworn in by acting Chief Justice John Paul Stevens. "All Americans can be confident that the 17th chief justice of the United States will be prudent in exercising judicial power, firm in defending judicial independence and above all a faithful guardian of the Constitution."

Roberts, in brief remarks following his swearing in, pledged to respect the law and Constitution when he takes his seat at the high court on Monday.

"What Daniel Webster termed the miracle of our Constitution is not something that happens in every generation, but every generation in its turn must accept the responsibility of supporting and defending the Constitution and bearing true faith and allegiance to it," Roberts said.

ALSO IN THE NEWS
September 22, 2005
Committee Sends Roberts Nomination to Full Senate
In a 13-5 vote Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee recommended that Judge John Roberts' nomination to serve as chief justice of the United States be approved by the full Senate.

Transcript: Kwame Holman reports on the committee action.

September 15, 2005
Judge Roberts Tries to Address Concerns of Skeptical Democrats
For the third consecutive day, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee grilled chief justice nominee John Roberts on his views of affirmative action, civil rights and big business, trying to get at his personal, rather than legal, view of the law.

Later in the afternoon, senators heard from legal experts, policy advocates and friends of the nominee.

Although Democrats expressed frustration with the lack of specific information on where Roberts stands on issues like abortion and congressional authority, experts predict the committee and the full Senate will likely approve the nominee perhaps as early as next week.

Transcript: Correspondent Kwame Holman recaps the fourth day of hearings.

Transcript: Analysts Tom Oliphant and David Brooks grade John Roberts' performance during his appearance.

RealAudio: Oliphant and Brooks, the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and the Chicago Tribune's Jan Crawford Greenburg discuss how effective Roberts was in making his case to wavering Democrats.

RealAudio Highlights from Democratic Senators' Final Questions
Sen. Patrick Leahy on war powers and the intelligence court Sen. Edward Kennedy questions Roberts on discrimination
Sen. Dianne Feinstein on immigration and congressional authority Sen. Russ Feingold on judicial reform and habeas corpus
Sen. Charles Schumer asks Roberts about whether he is an ideologue Sen. Richard Durbin on how Roberts' choice of clients reflects on his record
Main: Supreme Court Watch
Main: The Roberts Confirmation
ROBERTS REPORTS
Biography
Politicizing the Confirmation Process

Key Players

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.
John Roberts' Managers
Archive
RESOURCES
A Court Glossary
The Confirmation Process
Highlights of Supreme Court Nominees
TEACHER RESOURCES
Student Activity
Lesson Plan: Confirmation Process
Lesson Plan: The Supreme Court
 
 
The National Law Journal

The National Law Journal and Online NewsHour are working together to produce coverage of John Roberts' confirmation.

Articles by Marcia Coyle

Stakes Higher over Roberts
Although closely and sometimes passionately divided on a number of key constitutional issues, the high court today is a confident and remarkably collegial group in which opinions do not often stray into personal attacks on each other. Much of the credit for that belonged to William Rehnquist.

A changing landscape

He's had longevity, but is he 'great'?


Articles by Tony Mauro
An Early Crucible

 


    REGIONS | TOPICS | RECENT PROGRAMS | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK |SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS:
POD|RSS
SEARCH
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.