How do gender roles in an immigrant’s home country affect the female labor force here?
Editor’s Note: For 29 years now, Paul Solman’s reports on the NewsHour aim to make sense of economic news and research for a general audience. Since 2007, our Making Sen$e page has vowed to do the same, turning to leading academics and thinkers in the fields of business and economics to help explain what’s interesting and relevant about their work. That includes reports and interviews with economists affiliated with the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Each month, the NBER Digest summarizes several recent NBER working papers. These papers have not been peer-reviewed, but are circulated by their authors for comment and discussion. With the NBER’s blessing, Making Sen$e is pleased to feature these summaries regularly on our page.
The following summary was written by the NBER and doesn’t necessarily reflect the views of Making Sen$e.
Immigrants are an increasing presence in the United States. The foreign-born population grew from 4.8 percent of the total population in 1970 to 12.9 percent in 2012, and the share of U.S. children who were immigrants themselves or who had at least one immigrant parent increased from 13 percent of the total population in 1990 to 23 percent in 2008.
MORE FROM MAKING SEN$E
Along with the rise in the immigrant population came a shift in the predominant origins of immigrants. The principal source of immigrants has shifted from countries in Europe with cultures that are broadly similar to that of the United States to regions with very different cultures and traditions. How much does an immigrant’s source country affect their adjustment to American life? What role does assimilation play in that adjustment? Do differences between immigrants and the native-born population carry over to the second generation in labor supply, education and fertility, or do second generation women fully assimilate to native patterns?
In “Immigrants and Gender Roles: Assimilation vs. Culture,” Francine D. Blau reports on a research program with Lawrence M. Kahn that examines the roles of assimilation and source-country culture as influences on immigrant women’s behavior. The research focuses in particular on labor supply, because immigrants are increasingly coming from countries that have a more gender-based division of labor than is currently the case in the United States. Typically, the source countries have lower female labor force participation rates and higher fertility rates than the United States. There has been a growing gap between the labor supply of native-born women and immigrant women in the U.S. since 1980.
The researchers find considerable evidence that source country gender roles influence immigrants’ behavior. This influence appears to extend to second-generation women. At the same time, they also find evidence of assimilation. Immigrant women narrow the labor supply gap with native-born women as they spend more time in the United States. There is also considerable convergence of immigrants to native levels of schooling, fertility and labor supply across generations. For second-generation women, fertility and labor supply in their mother’s source country have a larger association with their behavior than the corresponding practices in their father’s source country.
Blau points out that in the future, immigrants’ source countries may become more similar to the United States, thus reducing the effect of source-country gender roles on the behavior of first- and second-generation immigrant women. This has already begun to happen with respect to fertility. The fertility of immigrant women relative to native-born women has been falling rapidly in the most recent immigrant cohorts.
— Les Picker, National Bureau of Economic Research