By: Gwen Ifill
Updated 5:30 p.m. Friday | One of the things we tell our children is that life is all about choices.
We celebrate this idea, because it is an essential part of the kind of ambition we want them to have. We want them to consider all the options, and then aspire to the best one.
In politics, the language of choice often comes loaded. School choice. Abortion rights. Public option. Proponents embrace these descriptions to put the best possible face on otherwise contentious issues.
This was one of the weeks where the politics of alternatives defined the debate. President Obama ended his week by pulling a compromise out of his hat on coverage for women's health care that sparked a surprisingly fierce pushback from the Catholic Church.
Should individuals pay for contraception? Should employers who object to birth control be required to pay? The tightrope solution from the White House -- make insurance companies pay. President Obama's decision to abandon his opposition to big-money super PACS was another painfully studied choice, since the president was on record in opposition to such spending.
Obama 2012 manager Jim Messina admitted as much in a campaign blog post.
"With so much at stake, we can't allow for two sets of rules in this election whereby the Republican nominee is the beneficiary of unlimited spending and Democrats unilaterally disarm," he wrote. The alternative, he suggested, was forced on them.
For GOP frontrunner Mitt Romney, who saw his march toward the Republican nomination slowed by a trio of primary season losses, the week's choice was more of a pivot.
» Read More ...