|   | 
           
             TRAC 
               Interview 
              Transcript
             Kirill Razlogov   
              (cont)
            So 
              there is nothing astonishing, nothing especially new about what's 
              happening now. It's something that we have known but somewhat have 
              forgotten. And to understand what is going on now, we have to understand 
              how these kind of situations were solved by Russian cultural traditions. 
              From this point of view, I think that weÑthe Russians and the Americans 
              and the Western scholarsÑlargely overestimate the importance of 
              the 1917 Revolution. My feeling is that, as far as everyday life 
              of the people is concerned, as far as cultural traditions are concerned, 
              as far as habits, customs, feelings are concerned, nothing much 
              changed.  
             What 
              changed the superstructure, and the Orthodox Christianity was replaced 
              by Marxism/Leninism. And it explains why 70 years after, Marxism/Leninism 
              was so easily replaced by Orthodox Christianity. Because the place 
              was there, and by reading about the role of the Orthodox church 
              in Russian history, we come upon exactly the same things that happened 
              during the Communist regime. For example, the Orthodox church had 
              a rule that four of the most important ministers, which were the 
              minister of education and internal affairs, and some others, important 
              ministers, had to be Orthodox. What the Communists did about it, 
              they established a rule that all the ministers should be Communists. 
              But the rule is the same, and the approach is the same. And the 
              relation between the Communist Party and the State was, in fact, 
              the same as the relation between the State and the Orthodox Church 
              in the Czarist period. It was not exactly the same, because there 
              was this great fight of who's more important, the Czar or the church, 
              and the religious schisms of the 17th Century, and the fight inside 
              the church in the 18th and the 19th Century. I'll give many examples 
              of how this fight was going on. But in fact, the place was occupied 
              by the Communist Party, who took all the decisions without answering 
              for them. And the role of the Central Committee of the Communist 
              Party was exactly corresponding to the role of the church in the 
              kind of state Russia has become.  
             To 
              that we can add a geographical remark which is very funny as we 
              go see the recent Russian history, because the Central Committee 
              of the Communist Party, you know MoscowÑyou have been to MoscowÑis 
              located in the old square special building which traditionally is 
              linked to the Central Committee of the Communist Party. So the fight 
              about the buildings that followed the fall down of the Soviet Union 
              was the fight to occupy separate places. And it's not by accident 
              that the president's administration replaced the Central Committee 
              of the Communist Party in this building exactly, because the function 
              of the president's administration had to be the same as the function 
              of the Central Committee. Now things are changing because the president's 
              administration is becoming weaker. But they still occupy the building, 
              they still occupy the function, and the fight around the Russian 
              white house, who will be there, be it the government or the parliament, 
              was a fight about power relations, but a very symbolic fight, because 
              fight about symbols is the fight we're thinking about when we're 
              speaking about the situation from a cultural studies point of view, 
              which will be my point of view here. Most of it was shared in part 
              by Victor, but Victor was much more flying in what he said and much 
              more free as an artist, and I have to be much more careful about 
              what I say.  
             So 
              coming back to this symbolical meaning of places, the symbolical 
              let's say the symbolical links between the past, the present, and 
              the future, we can also remember the hammer and the sickle symbol 
              was the symbol of the new Bolshevik civilization. It was, in fact, 
              like we discussed here, a transformation of the Islamic symbol of 
              the Moon crescent, and the Christian symbol of the Cross. So, putting 
              together an Islamic symbol with a Christian symbol and transforming 
              it into a symbol of union between workers and peasants, was a way 
              to transform the historical tradition without really breaking it. 
               
               
               
                  1 
                | 2 
                | 3 
                | 4 
                | 5 
                | 6 
                | 7 
                | 8   
              
           |